评估与髋骨位置有关的成人肌肉力学特性-初步研究。

IF 0.8
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-18 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02477-2024-02
Sebastian Szajkowski, Michał Dwornik, Jarosław Pasek, Grzegorz Cieślar
{"title":"评估与髋骨位置有关的成人肌肉力学特性-初步研究。","authors":"Sebastian Szajkowski, Michał Dwornik, Jarosław Pasek, Grzegorz Cieślar","doi":"10.37190/abb-02477-2024-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Asymmetry in the form of Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex (LPHC) is a common phenomenon in the adult population. No consensus has been reached in the literature reviewed, as far as the impact of posture defects upon the occurrence of muscle imbalance, faster development of degenerative changes in the joints and pain intensity are concerned. Thus, it needs to be defined clearly in which cases the diagnosis of (LPHC) asymmetry in adults provides the basis for starting rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to determine whether in the case of this asymmetry changes in the viscoelastic and biomechanical properties of LPHC muscles occur. <i>Methods</i>: The study comprised 64 adults, divided into two groups on the basis of physical examination: pelvic symmetrical (<i>n</i> = 34), and pelvic asymmetrical (<i>n</i> = 30). Myotonometric measurements of output parameters: tension, stiffness and elasticity were carried out to assess the mechanical properties of LPHC muscles in both groups. <i>Results</i>: Tension, stiffness and elasticity of the examined muscles, namely: abdominal muscles, rectus femoris muscle, erector muscle of the spine and biceps femoris muscle were measured. The pelvic symmetrical group, and the pelvic asymmetrical group did not differ with statistical significance as regards the comparison between the left and right sides of the body of the subjects. Also, no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of pain were found between the study groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Our findings have important clinical implications. The asymmetry of LPHC, commonly diagnosed in adults during functional examination for the purpose of physiotherapy, should not provide the basis for starting rehabilitation, in the absence of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"26 4","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the mechanical properties of muscles in adults in relation to the position of the hip bones - preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Szajkowski, Michał Dwornik, Jarosław Pasek, Grzegorz Cieślar\",\"doi\":\"10.37190/abb-02477-2024-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Asymmetry in the form of Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex (LPHC) is a common phenomenon in the adult population. No consensus has been reached in the literature reviewed, as far as the impact of posture defects upon the occurrence of muscle imbalance, faster development of degenerative changes in the joints and pain intensity are concerned. Thus, it needs to be defined clearly in which cases the diagnosis of (LPHC) asymmetry in adults provides the basis for starting rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to determine whether in the case of this asymmetry changes in the viscoelastic and biomechanical properties of LPHC muscles occur. <i>Methods</i>: The study comprised 64 adults, divided into two groups on the basis of physical examination: pelvic symmetrical (<i>n</i> = 34), and pelvic asymmetrical (<i>n</i> = 30). Myotonometric measurements of output parameters: tension, stiffness and elasticity were carried out to assess the mechanical properties of LPHC muscles in both groups. <i>Results</i>: Tension, stiffness and elasticity of the examined muscles, namely: abdominal muscles, rectus femoris muscle, erector muscle of the spine and biceps femoris muscle were measured. The pelvic symmetrical group, and the pelvic asymmetrical group did not differ with statistical significance as regards the comparison between the left and right sides of the body of the subjects. Also, no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of pain were found between the study groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Our findings have important clinical implications. The asymmetry of LPHC, commonly diagnosed in adults during functional examination for the purpose of physiotherapy, should not provide the basis for starting rehabilitation, in the absence of pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"19-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02477-2024-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02477-2024-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腰骨盆髋关节复合体(LPHC)形式的不对称是成年人中常见的现象。就体位缺陷对肌肉失衡发生的影响、关节退行性变发展较快、疼痛强度等方面,文献综述尚未达成共识。因此,在哪些情况下,成人LPHC不对称的诊断为开始康复提供了依据,需要明确界定。该研究的目的是确定在这种不对称的情况下,LPHC肌肉的粘弹性和生物力学性能是否会发生变化。方法:研究对象为64名成人,根据体格检查分为盆腔对称组(n = 34)和盆腔不对称组(n = 30)。通过测量输出参数:张力、刚度和弹性来评估两组LPHC肌肉的力学性能。结果:测量了腹肌、股直肌、脊柱竖肌、股二头肌的张力、刚度和弹性。盆腔对称组与盆腔不对称组受试者左右侧体比较,差异无统计学意义。此外,在研究组之间疼痛的发生率没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:我们的发现具有重要的临床意义。LPHC的不对称性,通常在成人进行物理治疗的功能检查时被诊断出来,在没有疼痛的情况下,不应该作为开始康复的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the mechanical properties of muscles in adults in relation to the position of the hip bones - preliminary study.

Purpose: Asymmetry in the form of Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex (LPHC) is a common phenomenon in the adult population. No consensus has been reached in the literature reviewed, as far as the impact of posture defects upon the occurrence of muscle imbalance, faster development of degenerative changes in the joints and pain intensity are concerned. Thus, it needs to be defined clearly in which cases the diagnosis of (LPHC) asymmetry in adults provides the basis for starting rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to determine whether in the case of this asymmetry changes in the viscoelastic and biomechanical properties of LPHC muscles occur. Methods: The study comprised 64 adults, divided into two groups on the basis of physical examination: pelvic symmetrical (n = 34), and pelvic asymmetrical (n = 30). Myotonometric measurements of output parameters: tension, stiffness and elasticity were carried out to assess the mechanical properties of LPHC muscles in both groups. Results: Tension, stiffness and elasticity of the examined muscles, namely: abdominal muscles, rectus femoris muscle, erector muscle of the spine and biceps femoris muscle were measured. The pelvic symmetrical group, and the pelvic asymmetrical group did not differ with statistical significance as regards the comparison between the left and right sides of the body of the subjects. Also, no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of pain were found between the study groups. Conclusions: Our findings have important clinical implications. The asymmetry of LPHC, commonly diagnosed in adults during functional examination for the purpose of physiotherapy, should not provide the basis for starting rehabilitation, in the absence of pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信