使用内牵引装置治疗下颌髁骨折7年。

Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-04-27 DOI:10.53045/jprs.2023-0046
Taichi Takada, Naoya Oshima, Yuki Iwashina, Mine Ozaki
{"title":"使用内牵引装置治疗下颌髁骨折7年。","authors":"Taichi Takada, Naoya Oshima, Yuki Iwashina, Mine Ozaki","doi":"10.53045/jprs.2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":520467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":"3 2","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Using an Internal Distraction Device during a 7-year Period.\",\"authors\":\"Taichi Takada, Naoya Oshima, Yuki Iwashina, Mine Ozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.53045/jprs.2023-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"71-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2023-0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2023-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下颌髁骨折是常见的,约占所有下颌骨折的25%-50%。然而,最佳治疗方法仍有争议。在过去的7年里,我们一直使用内牵引装置治疗下颌髁骨折。本研究的目的是分析我们的临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2015年4月至2022年6月在我院接受内牵引装置固定治疗的62例下颌髁骨折(84个关节)的病历。结果:男性34例,女性28例,手术时平均年龄49.7岁。术后3个月,平均开口宽度为42.3 mm。术后并发症包括暂时性面神经颞支麻痹(6例)和附着过程中器械断裂(22例,24个关节)。在所有损坏的病例中,在几周内将其取出,并且在开口方面获得了令人满意的结果。结论:与其他方法相比,该方法简便,效果满意,值得推荐作为治疗下颌髁突骨折的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Using an Internal Distraction Device during a 7-year Period.

Objectives: Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.

Results: The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.

Conclusions: This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信