{"title":"使用内牵引装置治疗下颌髁骨折7年。","authors":"Taichi Takada, Naoya Oshima, Yuki Iwashina, Mine Ozaki","doi":"10.53045/jprs.2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":520467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":"3 2","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Using an Internal Distraction Device during a 7-year Period.\",\"authors\":\"Taichi Takada, Naoya Oshima, Yuki Iwashina, Mine Ozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.53045/jprs.2023-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"71-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2023-0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2023-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Using an Internal Distraction Device during a 7-year Period.
Objectives: Mandibular condylar fractures are common, accounting for approximately 25%-50% of all mandibular fractures. However, the optimal therapeutic method remains controversial. We have used an internal distraction device for treating mandibular condylar fractures for the past 7 years. The aim of this study was to analyze our clinical outcomes.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of 62 patients with mandibular condylar fractures (84 joints) treated by internal distraction device fixation from April 2015 to June 2022 at our hospital.
Results: The patients were 34 males and 28 females (mean age of 49.7 years at surgery). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean mouth opening width was 42.3 mm. Postoperative complications included temporary facial nerve paralysis of a temporal branch (6 patients) and breakage of the device during attachment (22 patients, 24 joints). In all cases in which the device was broken, it was removed within a few weeks, and satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening were obtained.
Conclusions: This method is recommended as a treatment option for mandibular condylar fractures because of its simplicity and satisfactory results compared with other methods.