家庭照顾者的继发性创伤应激及应对策略。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Canan Demir Barutcu
{"title":"家庭照顾者的继发性创伤应激及应对策略。","authors":"Canan Demir Barutcu","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2479259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess secondary traumatic stress and coping strategies among caregivers. A descriptive, correlational design was employed, involving 274 caregivers of patients with chronic illnesses. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the Stress Coping Strategies Scale and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. The average age of caregivers was 55.88 ± 15.08 years, and the average duration of caregiving was 11.88 ± 7.00 years. It was found that caregivers mostly used ineffective coping methods such as the helpless and submissive approach to cope with stress. The overall secondary traumatic stress level was above the established scale midpoint (43.80 ± 10.46), with the highest scores in the avoidance subdimension and the lowest in the intrusion subdimension. The findings highlight that traumatic experiences impact not only those directly affected but also their caregivers. These results underscore the need for structured interventions to support caregivers in managing stress and mitigating secondary traumatic stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary traumatic stress and coping strategies in family caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Canan Demir Barutcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2479259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess secondary traumatic stress and coping strategies among caregivers. A descriptive, correlational design was employed, involving 274 caregivers of patients with chronic illnesses. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the Stress Coping Strategies Scale and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. The average age of caregivers was 55.88 ± 15.08 years, and the average duration of caregiving was 11.88 ± 7.00 years. It was found that caregivers mostly used ineffective coping methods such as the helpless and submissive approach to cope with stress. The overall secondary traumatic stress level was above the established scale midpoint (43.80 ± 10.46), with the highest scores in the avoidance subdimension and the lowest in the intrusion subdimension. The findings highlight that traumatic experiences impact not only those directly affected but also their caregivers. These results underscore the need for structured interventions to support caregivers in managing stress and mitigating secondary traumatic stress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2479259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2479259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估护理人员的继发性创伤应激及应对策略。采用描述性相关设计,涉及274名慢性疾病患者的护理人员。采用压力应对策略量表和二次创伤压力量表进行面对面访谈。护理人员的平均年龄为55.88±15.08岁,平均护理时间为11.88±7.00年。研究发现,照顾者大多采用无助、顺从等无效的应对方式来应对压力。总体继发性创伤应激水平高于量表中点(43.80±10.46),其中逃避子维度得分最高,侵犯子维度得分最低。研究结果强调,创伤经历不仅会影响直接受影响的人,还会影响他们的照顾者。这些结果强调需要结构化的干预措施,以支持护理人员管理压力和减轻继发性创伤压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary traumatic stress and coping strategies in family caregivers.

This study aimed to assess secondary traumatic stress and coping strategies among caregivers. A descriptive, correlational design was employed, involving 274 caregivers of patients with chronic illnesses. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the Stress Coping Strategies Scale and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. The average age of caregivers was 55.88 ± 15.08 years, and the average duration of caregiving was 11.88 ± 7.00 years. It was found that caregivers mostly used ineffective coping methods such as the helpless and submissive approach to cope with stress. The overall secondary traumatic stress level was above the established scale midpoint (43.80 ± 10.46), with the highest scores in the avoidance subdimension and the lowest in the intrusion subdimension. The findings highlight that traumatic experiences impact not only those directly affected but also their caregivers. These results underscore the need for structured interventions to support caregivers in managing stress and mitigating secondary traumatic stress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信