Mulligan和Maitland技术对肩袖病变患者疼痛、功能、本体感觉和生活质量的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tarik Celik, Burak Menek
{"title":"Mulligan和Maitland技术对肩袖病变患者疼痛、功能、本体感觉和生活质量的影响。","authors":"Tarik Celik, Burak Menek","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff disease treatment typically involves manual therapy and exercise as part of physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization methods on pain, functionality, quality of life, and proprioception in individuals with rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 45 individuals with rotator cuff lesions. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: conventional exercise, Maitland mobilization, and Mulligan mobilization. All participants were assessed pretreatment and post treatment using the Visual Analog Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life, range of motion (ROM), and proprioception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All parameters, except proprioception, improved significantly in all three groups post treatment (p < 0.05). Mulligan group (MG) and Maitland mobilization group (MMG) had higher improvements to the conventional exercise group (CG) in terms of flexion ROM (p = 0.05, effect size = 0.22), abduction ROM (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.26), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.56). Also, the MG group had greater improvements to the MMG and CG groups in terms of Rotator Cuff Quality of Life/symptoms (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.43), job (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.61), lifestyle (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.42), emotional parameters (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.29). MG was more effective than the MMG in Visual Analog Scale activity (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.32), external rotation (p = 0.012, effect size = 0.19), and abduction ROM (p = 0.002, effect size = 0.26). However, no improvement in proprioception was observed across all groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concluded that, in addition to conventional treatment, both Mulligan and Maitland mobilization therapy effectively improve range of motion, functionality, and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of Mulligan and Maitland techniques on pain, functionality, proprioception, and quality of life in individuals with rotator cuff lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Tarik Celik, Burak Menek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff disease treatment typically involves manual therapy and exercise as part of physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization methods on pain, functionality, quality of life, and proprioception in individuals with rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 45 individuals with rotator cuff lesions. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: conventional exercise, Maitland mobilization, and Mulligan mobilization. All participants were assessed pretreatment and post treatment using the Visual Analog Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life, range of motion (ROM), and proprioception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All parameters, except proprioception, improved significantly in all three groups post treatment (p < 0.05). Mulligan group (MG) and Maitland mobilization group (MMG) had higher improvements to the conventional exercise group (CG) in terms of flexion ROM (p = 0.05, effect size = 0.22), abduction ROM (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.26), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.56). Also, the MG group had greater improvements to the MMG and CG groups in terms of Rotator Cuff Quality of Life/symptoms (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.43), job (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.61), lifestyle (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.42), emotional parameters (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.29). MG was more effective than the MMG in Visual Analog Scale activity (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.32), external rotation (p = 0.012, effect size = 0.19), and abduction ROM (p = 0.002, effect size = 0.26). However, no improvement in proprioception was observed across all groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concluded that, in addition to conventional treatment, both Mulligan and Maitland mobilization therapy effectively improve range of motion, functionality, and quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩袖疾病的治疗通常包括手工治疗和运动作为物理治疗的一部分。目的:本研究旨在探讨Mulligan和Maitland活动方法对肩袖病变患者疼痛、功能、生活质量和本体感觉的影响。研究设计:这是一项单盲随机临床试验。方法:本研究纳入45例肩袖病变患者。参与者被随机分为三组:常规运动、Maitland动员和Mulligan动员。使用视觉模拟量表、手臂、肩膀和手的残疾、肩袖生活质量、活动范围(ROM)和本体感觉对所有参与者进行治疗前和治疗后的评估。结果:除本体感觉外,各组治疗后各项指标均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。Mulligan组(MG)和Maitland动员组(MMG)在屈曲ROM (p = 0.05,效应量= 0.22)、外展ROM (p = 0.02,效应量= 0.26)、手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(p 0.05)方面均比常规运动组(CG)有更高的改善。结论:本研究得出结论,除常规治疗外,Mulligan和Maitland活动疗法均能有效改善活动范围、功能和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of Mulligan and Maitland techniques on pain, functionality, proprioception, and quality of life in individuals with rotator cuff lesions.

Background: Rotator cuff disease treatment typically involves manual therapy and exercise as part of physical therapy.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization methods on pain, functionality, quality of life, and proprioception in individuals with rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Methods: The study included 45 individuals with rotator cuff lesions. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: conventional exercise, Maitland mobilization, and Mulligan mobilization. All participants were assessed pretreatment and post treatment using the Visual Analog Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life, range of motion (ROM), and proprioception.

Results: All parameters, except proprioception, improved significantly in all three groups post treatment (p < 0.05). Mulligan group (MG) and Maitland mobilization group (MMG) had higher improvements to the conventional exercise group (CG) in terms of flexion ROM (p = 0.05, effect size = 0.22), abduction ROM (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.26), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.56). Also, the MG group had greater improvements to the MMG and CG groups in terms of Rotator Cuff Quality of Life/symptoms (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.43), job (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.61), lifestyle (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.42), emotional parameters (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.29). MG was more effective than the MMG in Visual Analog Scale activity (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.32), external rotation (p = 0.012, effect size = 0.19), and abduction ROM (p = 0.002, effect size = 0.26). However, no improvement in proprioception was observed across all groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: This study concluded that, in addition to conventional treatment, both Mulligan and Maitland mobilization therapy effectively improve range of motion, functionality, and quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信