Gap Analysis of Encoding the Guidelines on Non-Opioid Approaches for Pain Management Using the Omaha System.

This study analyzed the gaps in clinical guidelines for the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement by using the Omaha System. Clinicians use various Non-Opioid approaches for pain management, leading to diverse coding requirements when inputting data into EHRs. Consequently, the lack of standardized coding for Non-Opioid pain management data leads to inconsistencies, hindering effective information transfer and reuse between care settings, impacting continuity of care. By encoding guidelines within the Omaha System, this study aims to create a standardized framework that enhances data integration and promotes seamless communication across healthcare environments. To address this, pain management guidelines for Non-Opioid approaches were mapped using the Omaha System, with a focus on content feasibility, linguistic validity, and term granularity. The analysis revealed three problems, three categories, and 11 targets in the coding of Non-Opioid approaches for pain management. By integrating guidelines encoded within EHRs, the development of improved guidelines is facilitated, enhancing their efficient utilization and thereby improving nursing records and information delivery systems. In conclusion, this approach addresses the need for standardized coding, advancing both guideline development and continuity of care through improved information systems.