股骨干骨折术前x线测量的比较:管径测量方法的研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Woo Ko, Jong Jin Moon, Gwang Chul Lee
{"title":"股骨干骨折术前x线测量的比较:管径测量方法的研究。","authors":"Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Woo Ko, Jong Jin Moon, Gwang Chul Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to determine the most reliable preoperative method for measuring canal diameter in femoral shaft fractures to optimize intramedullary nailing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients treated with intramedullary nailing at University Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. Each patient's canal diameter was measured using five techniques: simple anteroposterior (AP) radiography, simple lateral radiography, AP scanogram with a scano rod, lateral scanogram with a scano rod, and computed tomography (CT). Error was calculated as preoperative measurement minus actual nail diameter. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient and paired t tests, with subgroup analyses for isthmus fractures and osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT yielded the smallest error (-0.34 ± 0.87 mm and 0.25 ± 1.39 mm across observers), with Kappa values of 0.61-0.85 indicating substantial reliability. Only CT showed significant error differences for isthmus fractures (p < 0.05). No method differed significantly with osteoporosis (p > 0.05). Preoperative plans adjusted in 18% of scano rod cases due to discrepancies exceeding 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT offers the highest reliability, particularly for isthmus fractures, while scanograms outperform simple radiography, with AP views superior to lateral views. Further investigation is needed into osteoporosis effects on measurement accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of preoperative radiographic measurements for femoral shaft fractures: a study on canal diameter measurement methods.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Woo Ko, Jong Jin Moon, Gwang Chul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to determine the most reliable preoperative method for measuring canal diameter in femoral shaft fractures to optimize intramedullary nailing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients treated with intramedullary nailing at University Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. Each patient's canal diameter was measured using five techniques: simple anteroposterior (AP) radiography, simple lateral radiography, AP scanogram with a scano rod, lateral scanogram with a scano rod, and computed tomography (CT). Error was calculated as preoperative measurement minus actual nail diameter. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient and paired t tests, with subgroup analyses for isthmus fractures and osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT yielded the smallest error (-0.34 ± 0.87 mm and 0.25 ± 1.39 mm across observers), with Kappa values of 0.61-0.85 indicating substantial reliability. Only CT showed significant error differences for isthmus fractures (p < 0.05). No method differed significantly with osteoporosis (p > 0.05). Preoperative plans adjusted in 18% of scano rod cases due to discrepancies exceeding 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT offers the highest reliability, particularly for isthmus fractures, while scanograms outperform simple radiography, with AP views superior to lateral views. Further investigation is needed into osteoporosis effects on measurement accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定最可靠的术前测量股骨干骨折管径的方法,以优化髓内钉治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年10月至2019年12月在大学医院行髓内钉治疗的164例患者。使用五种技术测量每位患者的管径:简单正位(AP) x线摄影,简单侧位x线摄影,带扫描棒的AP扫描,带扫描棒的侧位扫描和计算机断层扫描(CT)。误差计算为术前测量值减去实际钉径。采用Cohen’s Kappa系数和配对t检验评估观察者间信度,并对峡部骨折和骨质疏松症进行亚组分析。结果:CT误差最小(观察者间误差分别为-0.34±0.87 mm和0.25±1.39 mm), Kappa值为0.61-0.85,具有较高的可靠性。只有CT显示峡部骨折的误差差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:CT提供了最高的可靠性,特别是对于峡部骨折,而扫描图优于简单的x线摄影,正位视图优于侧位视图。骨质疏松对测量精度的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of preoperative radiographic measurements for femoral shaft fractures: a study on canal diameter measurement methods.

Purpose: This study sought to determine the most reliable preoperative method for measuring canal diameter in femoral shaft fractures to optimize intramedullary nailing outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients treated with intramedullary nailing at University Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. Each patient's canal diameter was measured using five techniques: simple anteroposterior (AP) radiography, simple lateral radiography, AP scanogram with a scano rod, lateral scanogram with a scano rod, and computed tomography (CT). Error was calculated as preoperative measurement minus actual nail diameter. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient and paired t tests, with subgroup analyses for isthmus fractures and osteoporosis.

Results: CT yielded the smallest error (-0.34 ± 0.87 mm and 0.25 ± 1.39 mm across observers), with Kappa values of 0.61-0.85 indicating substantial reliability. Only CT showed significant error differences for isthmus fractures (p < 0.05). No method differed significantly with osteoporosis (p > 0.05). Preoperative plans adjusted in 18% of scano rod cases due to discrepancies exceeding 2 mm.

Conclusion: CT offers the highest reliability, particularly for isthmus fractures, while scanograms outperform simple radiography, with AP views superior to lateral views. Further investigation is needed into osteoporosis effects on measurement accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信