生殖创伤、脆弱的母亲和被剥夺公民权的悲伤:反思印度文学和电影叙事中代孕实践的情感维度。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Manali Karmakar
{"title":"生殖创伤、脆弱的母亲和被剥夺公民权的悲伤:反思印度文学和电影叙事中代孕实践的情感维度。","authors":"Manali Karmakar","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2477378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on an interdisciplinary approach, this study adopts and appropriates critical cultural theories such as Julia Kristeva's abjection and Pierre Bourdieu's social theories to examine the entangled and affective complexities of intending mothers, their reproductive trauma, and disenfranchised grief through the lens of Indian films such as <i>Filhaal</i> (2002) and works of fiction such as <i>Baby Makers: A Story of Indian Surrogacy</i> (2014) and <i>Kartikeya: The Destroyer's Son</i> (2017). Ample research has examined surrogate mothers' precarious position in the context of a surrogacy arrangement. However, not much has been discussed to reflect on the vulnerable status of the intending mothers who resort to surrogacy to fulfil their desire for motherhood. Thus, this study aims to highlight the significance of the selected fictional accounts to unfold the vulnerable and marginalised status of the intending mothers in a patriarchal society like India, where they find acceptance for their womanhood and earn respect and autonomy only through the power of their womb. The paper adopts generic fluidity and intersectionality as a methodology to critically analyse how the selected literature and film narratives can aid in instilling in us sensitivity towards the complex sociocultural positionality of the intending mothers who are normatively represented in popular discourses as immoral and monstrous. Emphasising the significance of the human rights-based approach to sexual and reproductive health, this research advocates for developing a non-discriminatory attitude towards intending mothers whose reproductive decision-making, privacy, and confidentiality related to the use of reproductive technology should be treated with respect and dignity.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2477378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive trauma, vulnerable mothers, and disenfranchised grief: reflecting on the affective dimensions of surrogacy practice in Indian literary and film narratives.\",\"authors\":\"Manali Karmakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26410397.2025.2477378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drawing on an interdisciplinary approach, this study adopts and appropriates critical cultural theories such as Julia Kristeva's abjection and Pierre Bourdieu's social theories to examine the entangled and affective complexities of intending mothers, their reproductive trauma, and disenfranchised grief through the lens of Indian films such as <i>Filhaal</i> (2002) and works of fiction such as <i>Baby Makers: A Story of Indian Surrogacy</i> (2014) and <i>Kartikeya: The Destroyer's Son</i> (2017). Ample research has examined surrogate mothers' precarious position in the context of a surrogacy arrangement. However, not much has been discussed to reflect on the vulnerable status of the intending mothers who resort to surrogacy to fulfil their desire for motherhood. Thus, this study aims to highlight the significance of the selected fictional accounts to unfold the vulnerable and marginalised status of the intending mothers in a patriarchal society like India, where they find acceptance for their womanhood and earn respect and autonomy only through the power of their womb. The paper adopts generic fluidity and intersectionality as a methodology to critically analyse how the selected literature and film narratives can aid in instilling in us sensitivity towards the complex sociocultural positionality of the intending mothers who are normatively represented in popular discourses as immoral and monstrous. Emphasising the significance of the human rights-based approach to sexual and reproductive health, this research advocates for developing a non-discriminatory attitude towards intending mothers whose reproductive decision-making, privacy, and confidentiality related to the use of reproductive technology should be treated with respect and dignity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2477378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039414/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2477378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2477378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用跨学科的方法,采用并利用批判性文化理论,如朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃的堕落和皮埃尔·布迪厄的社会理论,通过印度电影(如《菲哈尔》(2002))和小说作品(如《婴儿制造者:印度代孕的故事》(2014)和《卡蒂基亚:毁灭者的儿子》(2017))的镜头,研究潜在母亲的纠结和情感复杂性、她们的生殖创伤和被剥夺公权的悲伤。大量的研究调查了代孕母亲在代孕安排中的不稳定地位。然而,没有太多的讨论来反映那些寻求代孕来满足母亲愿望的准妈妈的弱势地位。因此,本研究旨在强调选定的虚构故事的重要性,以揭示在印度这样的父权社会中,准妈妈们的脆弱和边缘化地位,在那里,她们只能通过子宫的力量来接受自己的女性身份,赢得尊重和自主。本文采用一般的流动性和交叉性作为一种方法来批判性地分析所选的文学和电影叙事如何帮助我们对潜在母亲的复杂社会文化地位的敏感性灌输,这些母亲在流行话语中被规范地代表为不道德和可怕的。这项研究强调以人权为基础的性健康和生殖健康方针的重要性,提倡对准母亲采取不歧视的态度,她们的生殖决策、与使用生殖技术有关的隐私和保密应得到尊重和有尊严的对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproductive trauma, vulnerable mothers, and disenfranchised grief: reflecting on the affective dimensions of surrogacy practice in Indian literary and film narratives.

Drawing on an interdisciplinary approach, this study adopts and appropriates critical cultural theories such as Julia Kristeva's abjection and Pierre Bourdieu's social theories to examine the entangled and affective complexities of intending mothers, their reproductive trauma, and disenfranchised grief through the lens of Indian films such as Filhaal (2002) and works of fiction such as Baby Makers: A Story of Indian Surrogacy (2014) and Kartikeya: The Destroyer's Son (2017). Ample research has examined surrogate mothers' precarious position in the context of a surrogacy arrangement. However, not much has been discussed to reflect on the vulnerable status of the intending mothers who resort to surrogacy to fulfil their desire for motherhood. Thus, this study aims to highlight the significance of the selected fictional accounts to unfold the vulnerable and marginalised status of the intending mothers in a patriarchal society like India, where they find acceptance for their womanhood and earn respect and autonomy only through the power of their womb. The paper adopts generic fluidity and intersectionality as a methodology to critically analyse how the selected literature and film narratives can aid in instilling in us sensitivity towards the complex sociocultural positionality of the intending mothers who are normatively represented in popular discourses as immoral and monstrous. Emphasising the significance of the human rights-based approach to sexual and reproductive health, this research advocates for developing a non-discriminatory attitude towards intending mothers whose reproductive decision-making, privacy, and confidentiality related to the use of reproductive technology should be treated with respect and dignity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信