[颈动脉扭曲定量评估的外科意义]。

Q4 Medicine

Khirurgiya Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17116/hirurgia202503163

A V Gavrilenko, A V Abramyan, G F Magomedova, Zh Li, Z A Eremeeva, D A Semchenkova, P D Burkhanova, D D Donskaya

{"title":"[颈动脉扭曲定量评估的外科意义]。","authors":"A V Gavrilenko, A V Abramyan, G F Magomedova, Zh Li, Z A Eremeeva, D A Semchenkova, P D Burkhanova, D D Donskaya","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202503163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare sensitivity and specificity of various methods for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity.Material and methods: The study included 41 patients with carotid artery tortuosity confirmed by CT angiography.Results: All 3 mathematical models for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: model 1 - 80.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity; model 2 - 90.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity; model 3 - 86.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.Conclusion: All three mathematical models are valid for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity. The third method is the most convenient and quickest, as it requires only two parameters for calculation.","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 3","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical significance of quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity].\",\"authors\":\"A V Gavrilenko, A V Abramyan, G F Magomedova, Zh Li, Z A Eremeeva, D A Semchenkova, P D Burkhanova, D D Donskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia202503163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare sensitivity and specificity of various methods for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity.Material and methods: The study included 41 patients with carotid artery tortuosity confirmed by CT angiography.Results: All 3 mathematical models for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: model 1 - 80.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity; model 2 - 90.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity; model 3 - 86.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.Conclusion: All three mathematical models are valid for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity. The third method is the most convenient and quickest, as it requires only two parameters for calculation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"63-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202503163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202503163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：比较各种定量评价颈动脉扭曲的方法的敏感性和特异性。材料与方法：本研究纳入41例经CT血管造影证实的颈动脉扭曲患者。结果：3种定量评价颈动脉扭曲度的数学模型均具有较高的敏感性和特异性：模型1敏感性为80.0%，特异性为100.0%；模型2敏感性90.5%，特异性93.3%；模型3敏感性为86.7%，特异性为93.3%。结论：三种数学模型均可用于颈动脉扭曲程度的定量评价。第三种方法是最方便和最快的，因为它只需要两个参数进行计算。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

[Surgical significance of quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity].

Objective: To compare sensitivity and specificity of various methods for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity.

Material and methods: The study included 41 patients with carotid artery tortuosity confirmed by CT angiography.

Results: All 3 mathematical models for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: model 1 - 80.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity; model 2 - 90.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity; model 3 - 86.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.

Conclusion: All three mathematical models are valid for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity. The third method is the most convenient and quickest, as it requires only two parameters for calculation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

161

期刊介绍： Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень