B M Belik, Z A Abduragimov, R Sh Tenchurin, A V Rodakov, S Yu Efanov
{"title":"[Improvement of surgical strategy for acute biliary pancreatitis].","authors":"B M Belik, Z A Abduragimov, R Sh Tenchurin, A V Rodakov, S Yu Efanov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202503140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve surgical tactics for acute biliary pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 502 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Patients were divided into two groups depending on surgical tactics: control group (<i>n</i>=293) - standard diagnosis and treatment of biliary pancreatitis, main group (<i>n</i>=209) - treatment of biliary pancreatitis based on original algorithm. In these patients, therapeutic and diagnostic program included functional state of biliary tract and stratification of patients depending on severity of acute pancreatitis (APACHE II and Imrie/Glasgow scale) in addition to standard procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are 2 fundamentally different clinical variants of ductal hypertension and biliary pancreatitis: with acute blockade of pancreatobiliary tract (obstructive variant) and without this blockade (non-obstructive variant). Each variant included various clinical forms of acute biliary pancreatitis etiologically associated with specific biliary disease. In the 2<sup>nd</sup> group, a differentiated surgical approach was applied taking into account clinical variant of biliary pancreatitis. The first stage implied correction of pancreatobiliary ductal hypertension through minimally invasive methods. At the second stage, radical surgical debridement of biliary tract was performed with elimination of etiological factor of biliary pancreatitis within the same hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate disease. In patients with severe biliary pancreatitis, the second stage of treatment was carried out 3 months after discharge. This treatment strategy reduced the number of infectious and inflammatory complications from 26.6% to 11.5%, mortality from 7.5% to 3.3% and avoid recurrent biliary pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Original therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm optimizes surgical strategy and improves the effectiveness of treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 3","pages":"40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202503140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:改善急性胆源性胰腺炎的手术策略:改进急性胆源性胰腺炎的手术策略:对 502 名急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的治疗结果进行分析。根据手术策略将患者分为两组:对照组(人数=293)--胆源性胰腺炎的标准诊断和治疗;主要组(人数=209)--根据原始算法治疗胆源性胰腺炎。在这些患者中,除了标准程序外,治疗和诊断方案还包括胆道功能状态以及根据急性胰腺炎的严重程度(APACHE II 和 Imrie/Glasgow 量表)对患者进行分层:结果:胆管高压和胆源性胰腺炎有两种根本不同的临床变体:胰胆管急性阻塞(阻塞性变体)和无阻塞(非阻塞性变体)。每种变体都包括与特定胆道疾病相关的急性胆源性胰腺炎的各种临床形式。在第二组中,考虑到胆源性胰腺炎的临床变异,采用了有区别的手术方法。第一阶段意味着通过微创方法矫正胰胆管高压。在第二阶段,对轻度至中度胆源性胰腺炎患者进行胆道根治性外科清创术,并在同一次住院中消除胆源性胰腺炎的致病因素。重症胆源性胰腺炎患者则在出院 3 个月后进行第二阶段治疗。这一治疗策略将感染和炎症并发症的发生率从26.6%降至11.5%,死亡率从7.5%降至3.3%,并避免了胆源性胰腺炎的复发:原创的治疗和诊断算法优化了手术策略,提高了急性胆源性胰腺炎的治疗效果。
[Improvement of surgical strategy for acute biliary pancreatitis].
Objective: To improve surgical tactics for acute biliary pancreatitis.
Material and methods: Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 502 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Patients were divided into two groups depending on surgical tactics: control group (n=293) - standard diagnosis and treatment of biliary pancreatitis, main group (n=209) - treatment of biliary pancreatitis based on original algorithm. In these patients, therapeutic and diagnostic program included functional state of biliary tract and stratification of patients depending on severity of acute pancreatitis (APACHE II and Imrie/Glasgow scale) in addition to standard procedures.
Results: There are 2 fundamentally different clinical variants of ductal hypertension and biliary pancreatitis: with acute blockade of pancreatobiliary tract (obstructive variant) and without this blockade (non-obstructive variant). Each variant included various clinical forms of acute biliary pancreatitis etiologically associated with specific biliary disease. In the 2nd group, a differentiated surgical approach was applied taking into account clinical variant of biliary pancreatitis. The first stage implied correction of pancreatobiliary ductal hypertension through minimally invasive methods. At the second stage, radical surgical debridement of biliary tract was performed with elimination of etiological factor of biliary pancreatitis within the same hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate disease. In patients with severe biliary pancreatitis, the second stage of treatment was carried out 3 months after discharge. This treatment strategy reduced the number of infectious and inflammatory complications from 26.6% to 11.5%, mortality from 7.5% to 3.3% and avoid recurrent biliary pancreatitis.
Conclusion: Original therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm optimizes surgical strategy and improves the effectiveness of treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.