Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang
{"title":"遗传性视网膜疾病高通量新一代测序诊断率的种族差异:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang","doi":"10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19594,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"215-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethnic disparity in the diagnostic yield of high-throughput next-generation sequencing in inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"215-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The ethnic disparity in the diagnostic yield of high-throughput next-generation sequencing in inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.
Methods: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.
Results: A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.
Conclusions: This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Genetics accepts original papers, review articles and short communications on the clinical and molecular genetic aspects of ocular diseases.