遗传性视网膜疾病高通量新一代测序诊断率的种族差异:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ophthalmic Genetics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843
Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang
{"title":"遗传性视网膜疾病高通量新一代测序诊断率的种族差异:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang","doi":"10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19594,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"215-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethnic disparity in the diagnostic yield of high-throughput next-generation sequencing in inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Yi Lin, Ching-Yun Wang, Lawrence Chen, Shun-Ping Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"215-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2025.2464843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新一代测序(NGS)是遗传异质性遗传性视网膜疾病(IRDs)的最新分子诊断技术。然而,种族差异对IRD患者NGS诊断率的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了系统回顾(SR)和荟萃分析(MA)来描述这个问题。方法:于2024年1月30日检索MEDLINE和PubMed数据库。2013年至2024年间发表的报告基于面板的测序的IRD诊断率的原始研究符合纳入条件。诊断率定义为高通量面板筛选后分子诊断的患者比例。研究按IRD入组表型和患者祖先进行分层。结果:荟萃分析共纳入42项研究,包括23,324例评估诊断率的患者。在与ird相关的入组研究中,合并诊断率为0.570 [0.530,0.610],0.617 [0.568];[0.664]已登记税务局的人士。血统分层研究的诊断产率为0.629 [0.568;0.688],诊断率降至0.549 [0.456;[0.641]东亚人。缺乏拉丁美洲证据综合的可用数据。结论:本综述支持在基于面板的ird测序中存在种族差异。具体而言,与欧洲人群相比,东亚人群的诊断率相对较低,不确定诊断率较高。因此,我们的研究结果将促使未来在非白人中重新分类未知意义变异(VUS),以改善IRDs分子诊断产量的种族不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ethnic disparity in the diagnostic yield of high-throughput next-generation sequencing in inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for genetic heterogenous inherited-retinal diseases (IRDs). However, the impact of ethnic discrepancy in NGS diagnostic yields for patients with IRD is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systemic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to delineate this issue.

Methods: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched on 30 January 2024. Original studies published between 2013 and 2024 that reported the IRD diagnostic yield of panel-based sequencing was eligible for inclusion. The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a molecular diagnosis after high-throughput panel screening. Studies were stratified by IRD enrollment phenotype and patient ancestry.

Results: A total of 42 studies comprising 23,324 patients evaluated for diagnosis yield were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield was 0.570 [0.530,0.610] across studies with IRD-related enrollment and 0.617 [0.568; 0.664] for those with IRD enrollment. The stratification of studies for ancestry produced a diagnostic yield of 0.629 [0.568; 0.688] in Europeans, and the diagnostic yield dropped to 0.549 [0.456; 0.641] for East Asians. There is a lack of available data for Latin American evidence meta-synthesis.

Conclusions: This review supports the existence of ethnic disparity in panel-based sequencing for IRDs. Specifically, a relatively lower diagnostic yield and a higher inconclusive diagnosis rate are present in East Asian populations compared to the European population. Consequently, our findings should prompt future reclassification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in non-whites to improve the ethnic inequities of molecular diagnostic yields for IRDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Genetics
Ophthalmic Genetics 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Genetics accepts original papers, review articles and short communications on the clinical and molecular genetic aspects of ocular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信