困难的遭遇会影响疼痛治疗的结果吗?前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf027
Winnie L Liu, Evelien van Gelderen, Resham Mawalkar, Eric J Wang, Glenn Treisman, Steven P Cohen
{"title":"困难的遭遇会影响疼痛治疗的结果吗?前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Winnie L Liu, Evelien van Gelderen, Resham Mawalkar, Eric J Wang, Glenn Treisman, Steven P Cohen","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficult encounters represent an enormous burden and drain on resources in pain medicine, but their effect on outcome has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of \"difficult\" encounters on chronic pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, new chronic pain visits were rated by an attending physician and trainee on a 6-point Likert scale and stratified into \"difficult\" and \"non-difficult\". The main outcome was successful treatment, defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in average pain 4 weeks after initiating pharmacological, integrative or injection therapy or 12 weeks after invasive procedures. The secondary outcome was lost-to-follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 428 patients seen for new-patient evaluations, 299 patients had follow-up, of which 127 (42.5%) experienced a positive outcome. Patients involved in difficult encounters were less likely to experience a positive outcome (28% vs. 46%; P = 0.02) than those not involved in difficult encounters. When stratified into quartiles, difficulty continued to be associated with an unsuccessful outcome, with the easiest encounters translating to a 53% success rate vs. 28% for patients involved in the most difficult encounters (P = 0.02). Difficult encounters were not associated with lost-to-follow-up. In multivariable analysis evaluating factors associated with difficultness, ≥10% missed appointments (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; P = 04), nonorganic signs (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.90; P = 0.03), visiting taking longer than expected (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; P = 0.04) and refusal to try a treatment (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.70; P = 0.01) were associated with poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difficult encounters can not only lead to administrative burdens, poor ratings and lost revenue, but are also associated with negative outcomes for chronic pain, a condition notoriously associated with difficult visits.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585619); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05585619? id=NCT05585619&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Difficult Encounters Affect Pain Treatment Outcomes? A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie L Liu, Evelien van Gelderen, Resham Mawalkar, Eric J Wang, Glenn Treisman, Steven P Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficult encounters represent an enormous burden and drain on resources in pain medicine, but their effect on outcome has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of \\\"difficult\\\" encounters on chronic pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, new chronic pain visits were rated by an attending physician and trainee on a 6-point Likert scale and stratified into \\\"difficult\\\" and \\\"non-difficult\\\". The main outcome was successful treatment, defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in average pain 4 weeks after initiating pharmacological, integrative or injection therapy or 12 weeks after invasive procedures. The secondary outcome was lost-to-follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 428 patients seen for new-patient evaluations, 299 patients had follow-up, of which 127 (42.5%) experienced a positive outcome. Patients involved in difficult encounters were less likely to experience a positive outcome (28% vs. 46%; P = 0.02) than those not involved in difficult encounters. When stratified into quartiles, difficulty continued to be associated with an unsuccessful outcome, with the easiest encounters translating to a 53% success rate vs. 28% for patients involved in the most difficult encounters (P = 0.02). Difficult encounters were not associated with lost-to-follow-up. In multivariable analysis evaluating factors associated with difficultness, ≥10% missed appointments (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; P = 04), nonorganic signs (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.90; P = 0.03), visiting taking longer than expected (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; P = 0.04) and refusal to try a treatment (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.70; P = 0.01) were associated with poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difficult encounters can not only lead to administrative burdens, poor ratings and lost revenue, but are also associated with negative outcomes for chronic pain, a condition notoriously associated with difficult visits.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585619); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05585619? id=NCT05585619&rank=1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:困难遭遇是疼痛医学的巨大负担和资源消耗,但其对结果的影响尚未研究。目的:确定“困难”遭遇对慢性疼痛结局的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,新就诊的慢性疼痛患者由一名主治医生和一名实习生按照6分李克特量表进行评分,并分为“困难”和“非困难”。主要结局是治疗成功,定义为在开始药物、综合或注射治疗后4周或侵入性手术后12周平均疼痛减轻≥2点。次要结局为失访。结果:在428例接受新患者评估的患者中,299例患者进行了随访,其中127例(42.5%)获得了阳性结果。遇到困难的患者不太可能经历积极的结果(28%对46%;P = 0.02)。当按四分位数分层时,难度继续与不成功的结果相关,最简单的遭遇转化为53%的成功率,而最困难的遭遇转化为28% (P = 0.02)。困难的遭遇与失访无关。在评估困难相关因素的多变量分析中,≥10%的患者错过了预约(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 ~ 0.97;P = 04),非有机体征(OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 ~ 0.90;P = 0.03),就诊时间长于预期(OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.96;P = 0.04)和拒绝尝试治疗(OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 ~ 0.70;P = 0.01)与预后不良相关。结论:就诊困难不仅会导致行政负担、评分差和收入损失,而且还与慢性疼痛的负面结果有关,慢性疼痛是众所周知的与就诊困难有关。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585619);https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05585619?id = NCT05585619&rank = 1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Difficult Encounters Affect Pain Treatment Outcomes? A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Difficult encounters represent an enormous burden and drain on resources in pain medicine, but their effect on outcome has not been studied.

Objective: To determine the effect of "difficult" encounters on chronic pain outcomes.

Methods: In this prospective study, new chronic pain visits were rated by an attending physician and trainee on a 6-point Likert scale and stratified into "difficult" and "non-difficult". The main outcome was successful treatment, defined as a ≥ 2-point reduction in average pain 4 weeks after initiating pharmacological, integrative or injection therapy or 12 weeks after invasive procedures. The secondary outcome was lost-to-follow-up.

Results: Among 428 patients seen for new-patient evaluations, 299 patients had follow-up, of which 127 (42.5%) experienced a positive outcome. Patients involved in difficult encounters were less likely to experience a positive outcome (28% vs. 46%; P = 0.02) than those not involved in difficult encounters. When stratified into quartiles, difficulty continued to be associated with an unsuccessful outcome, with the easiest encounters translating to a 53% success rate vs. 28% for patients involved in the most difficult encounters (P = 0.02). Difficult encounters were not associated with lost-to-follow-up. In multivariable analysis evaluating factors associated with difficultness, ≥10% missed appointments (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; P = 04), nonorganic signs (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.90; P = 0.03), visiting taking longer than expected (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; P = 0.04) and refusal to try a treatment (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.70; P = 0.01) were associated with poor outcome.

Conclusions: Difficult encounters can not only lead to administrative burdens, poor ratings and lost revenue, but are also associated with negative outcomes for chronic pain, a condition notoriously associated with difficult visits.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585619); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05585619? id=NCT05585619&rank=1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信