{"title":"评估踝关节关节炎治疗的实用观点:随访缺失的挑战及其对研究有效性的影响:对Mark Glazebrook, PhD, MD, FRCSC等人的一篇文章的评论:“全踝关节置换术与踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节关节炎的结果。”上一次报告至少10年的简明后续行动”。","authors":"Bruce Sangeorzan, Daniel Norvell","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 6","pages":"664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pragmatic Perspective on Evaluating Ankle Arthritis Treatments: The Challenges of Loss to Follow-up and Its Impact on Study Validity: Commentary on an article by Mark Glazebrook, PhD, MD, FRCSC, et al.: \\\"Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for the Treatment of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis. A Concise Follow-up, at a Minimum of 10 Years, of a Previous Report\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Sangeorzan, Daniel Norvell\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.01025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\"107 6\",\"pages\":\"664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pragmatic Perspective on Evaluating Ankle Arthritis Treatments: The Challenges of Loss to Follow-up and Its Impact on Study Validity: Commentary on an article by Mark Glazebrook, PhD, MD, FRCSC, et al.: "Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for the Treatment of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis. A Concise Follow-up, at a Minimum of 10 Years, of a Previous Report".
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.