Leon G Aldrovandi, Matthias E T Dessein, Shelley M Pearson, Shelley M Bulling
{"title":"宫颈癌近距离治疗中环形涂抹器重建的位置依赖偏移校正。","authors":"Leon G Aldrovandi, Matthias E T Dessein, Shelley M Pearson, Shelley M Bulling","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the tight curvature in their design, ring applicators are usually associated with large positioning errors. The standard practice to correct for these deviations based on global offsets may not be sufficient to comply with the recommended tolerance. In this work, we investigate two methods for applicator reconstruction that implement position-dependent source offset corrections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed using the Varian Interstitial PEEK Ring 60° and a Varian BRAVOS afterloader. Source positioning was characterized by means of autoradiographs acquired for three different loading patterns and three <sup>192</sup>Ir sources over a period of 5 months. Additionally, the actual source path was determined by means of a series of planar kV images for different dummy cable positions. The first position-dependent correction method consists of locally modifying the radius of the reconstructed source path according to the measured offsets. The second method, recommended by Varian, simulates a bidirectional movement of the source during applicator reconstruction to compensate for positioning errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autoradiographs showed a quasi-linear increase of the dwell position offsets, with a negligible error at the tip and a value close to 3 mm at the end of the ring. This result, consistent with a circular wire movement with an effective radius 0.5 mm larger than the nominal value, was in agreement with the observations from the kV images. After implementation of the position-dependent correction methods, residual positioning errors for the two methods resulted in a mean value (±1 SD) of 0.0 (±0.3) mm, and a range of [-0.7 mm, 0.7 mm].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two tested methods for applicator reconstruction with position-dependent source offset corrections were able to successfully correct the positioning errors. The method recommended by the manufacturer had the additional advantages of a more straightforward implementation and the potential for use in other applicator types.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position-dependent offset corrections for ring applicator reconstruction in cervical cancer brachytherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Leon G Aldrovandi, Matthias E T Dessein, Shelley M Pearson, Shelley M Bulling\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the tight curvature in their design, ring applicators are usually associated with large positioning errors. The standard practice to correct for these deviations based on global offsets may not be sufficient to comply with the recommended tolerance. In this work, we investigate two methods for applicator reconstruction that implement position-dependent source offset corrections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed using the Varian Interstitial PEEK Ring 60° and a Varian BRAVOS afterloader. Source positioning was characterized by means of autoradiographs acquired for three different loading patterns and three <sup>192</sup>Ir sources over a period of 5 months. Additionally, the actual source path was determined by means of a series of planar kV images for different dummy cable positions. The first position-dependent correction method consists of locally modifying the radius of the reconstructed source path according to the measured offsets. The second method, recommended by Varian, simulates a bidirectional movement of the source during applicator reconstruction to compensate for positioning errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autoradiographs showed a quasi-linear increase of the dwell position offsets, with a negligible error at the tip and a value close to 3 mm at the end of the ring. This result, consistent with a circular wire movement with an effective radius 0.5 mm larger than the nominal value, was in agreement with the observations from the kV images. After implementation of the position-dependent correction methods, residual positioning errors for the two methods resulted in a mean value (±1 SD) of 0.0 (±0.3) mm, and a range of [-0.7 mm, 0.7 mm].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two tested methods for applicator reconstruction with position-dependent source offset corrections were able to successfully correct the positioning errors. The method recommended by the manufacturer had the additional advantages of a more straightforward implementation and the potential for use in other applicator types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:由于其设计的紧密曲率,环形涂抹器通常与较大的定位误差相关。基于全局偏移量纠正这些偏差的标准做法可能不足以符合推荐的公差。在这项工作中,我们研究了两种实现位置相关源偏移校正的应用程序重建方法。方法:使用瓦里安间隙PEEK环60°和瓦里安BRAVOS后装器进行测量。在5个月的时间里,对三种不同的加载模式和三个192Ir源进行了自射线照相,以确定源的定位。此外,通过一系列平面kV图像确定了不同虚拟电缆位置的实际源路径。第一种位置相关校正方法是根据测量的偏移量局部修改重构源路径的半径。Varian推荐的第二种方法是在涂抹器重建过程中模拟源的双向运动,以补偿定位误差。结果:射线自显像显示,驻留位置偏移呈准线性增加,在尖端的误差可以忽略不计,在环的末端接近3mm。这一结果与有效半径比标称值大0.5 mm的圆形导线运动一致,与kV图像的观测结果一致。采用位置相关校正方法后,两种方法的剩余定位误差均值(±1 SD)为0.0(±0.3)mm,范围为[-0.7 mm, 0.7 mm]。结论:两种基于位置相关源偏移校正的施药器重建方法均能成功地校正定位误差。制造商推荐的方法具有更直接的实现和在其他涂抹器类型中使用的潜力的额外优点。
Position-dependent offset corrections for ring applicator reconstruction in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Purpose: Due to the tight curvature in their design, ring applicators are usually associated with large positioning errors. The standard practice to correct for these deviations based on global offsets may not be sufficient to comply with the recommended tolerance. In this work, we investigate two methods for applicator reconstruction that implement position-dependent source offset corrections.
Methods: Measurements were performed using the Varian Interstitial PEEK Ring 60° and a Varian BRAVOS afterloader. Source positioning was characterized by means of autoradiographs acquired for three different loading patterns and three 192Ir sources over a period of 5 months. Additionally, the actual source path was determined by means of a series of planar kV images for different dummy cable positions. The first position-dependent correction method consists of locally modifying the radius of the reconstructed source path according to the measured offsets. The second method, recommended by Varian, simulates a bidirectional movement of the source during applicator reconstruction to compensate for positioning errors.
Results: Autoradiographs showed a quasi-linear increase of the dwell position offsets, with a negligible error at the tip and a value close to 3 mm at the end of the ring. This result, consistent with a circular wire movement with an effective radius 0.5 mm larger than the nominal value, was in agreement with the observations from the kV images. After implementation of the position-dependent correction methods, residual positioning errors for the two methods resulted in a mean value (±1 SD) of 0.0 (±0.3) mm, and a range of [-0.7 mm, 0.7 mm].
Conclusion: The two tested methods for applicator reconstruction with position-dependent source offset corrections were able to successfully correct the positioning errors. The method recommended by the manufacturer had the additional advantages of a more straightforward implementation and the potential for use in other applicator types.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic