利用FLUKA蒙特卡罗代码建立双散射质子治疗喷嘴的模型并分析前列腺癌患者的线性能量转移。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rasmus Klitgaard, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg, Perry Johnson, Mark Artz, Nancy Price Mendenhall, Curtis Bryant, Ludvig Paul Muren
{"title":"利用FLUKA蒙特卡罗代码建立双散射质子治疗喷嘴的模型并分析前列腺癌患者的线性能量转移。","authors":"Rasmus Klitgaard, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg, Perry Johnson, Mark Artz, Nancy Price Mendenhall, Curtis Bryant, Ludvig Paul Muren","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET<sub>D</sub>) in proton therapy (PT) has in pre-clinical studies been linked to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. Until recently, the most common PT delivery method in prostate cancer has been double-scattered PT, with LET<sub>D</sub> only available through dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, as most studies of the relationship between LET<sub>D</sub> and RBE in double scattered PT have been focused on the head and neck region, existing MC implementations have not been capable of calculating LET<sub>D</sub> for the longer field ranges used, for example, in the pelvic region.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The initial aim of this study was to implement a MC code allowing for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer. Additionally, we explored LET<sub>D</sub> profiles and LET<sub>D</sub> as a function of field configuration, by performing MC calculations for a large prostate cancer cohort treated with double-scattered PT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The components of a passive scattered clinical treatment nozzle used for delivery of extended field ranges, with two associated modulation wheels, were implemented into an existing FLUKA MC framework for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations. The code was validated to spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) measurements conducted using the treatment nozzle with 11 different range and modulation width configurations. After validation, LET<sub>D</sub> distributions were calculated on the planning computed tomographies of 582 prostate cancer patients treated with two-field double-scattered PT. All patients had symmetric field configurations with respect to the sagittal plane, with one pair of posterior oblique, lateral opposing, or anterior oblique fields. Dose and LET<sub>D</sub> volume parameters and the mean LET<sub>D</sub> ratio between the bladder and rectum were compared across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range differences were below 1 mm for all SOBP scenarios used for calibration. For 9 of 11 SOBP scenarios, the modulation width differences were below 2 mm. For the patient simulations, the mean gamma pass rates (3 mm/3%) were at least 98% in the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Comparing anterior to posterior field configurations, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> in the bladder increased within both the 10 and 70 Gy iso-dose regions, and conversely, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> decreased for the rectum. There was a marked difference in the mean bladder-to-rectum LET<sub>D</sub> ratios between anterior oblique, lateral opposing and posterior oblique field configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A MC code allowing for accurate calculations of dose and LET<sub>D</sub> in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer was implemented and validated. The LET<sub>D</sub> distributions in the rectum and bladder showed a systematic dependence on the field configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling of a double-scattering proton therapy nozzle using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and analysis of linear energy transfer in patients treated for prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Rasmus Klitgaard, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg, Perry Johnson, Mark Artz, Nancy Price Mendenhall, Curtis Bryant, Ludvig Paul Muren\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET<sub>D</sub>) in proton therapy (PT) has in pre-clinical studies been linked to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. Until recently, the most common PT delivery method in prostate cancer has been double-scattered PT, with LET<sub>D</sub> only available through dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, as most studies of the relationship between LET<sub>D</sub> and RBE in double scattered PT have been focused on the head and neck region, existing MC implementations have not been capable of calculating LET<sub>D</sub> for the longer field ranges used, for example, in the pelvic region.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The initial aim of this study was to implement a MC code allowing for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer. Additionally, we explored LET<sub>D</sub> profiles and LET<sub>D</sub> as a function of field configuration, by performing MC calculations for a large prostate cancer cohort treated with double-scattered PT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The components of a passive scattered clinical treatment nozzle used for delivery of extended field ranges, with two associated modulation wheels, were implemented into an existing FLUKA MC framework for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations. The code was validated to spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) measurements conducted using the treatment nozzle with 11 different range and modulation width configurations. After validation, LET<sub>D</sub> distributions were calculated on the planning computed tomographies of 582 prostate cancer patients treated with two-field double-scattered PT. All patients had symmetric field configurations with respect to the sagittal plane, with one pair of posterior oblique, lateral opposing, or anterior oblique fields. Dose and LET<sub>D</sub> volume parameters and the mean LET<sub>D</sub> ratio between the bladder and rectum were compared across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range differences were below 1 mm for all SOBP scenarios used for calibration. For 9 of 11 SOBP scenarios, the modulation width differences were below 2 mm. For the patient simulations, the mean gamma pass rates (3 mm/3%) were at least 98% in the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Comparing anterior to posterior field configurations, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> in the bladder increased within both the 10 and 70 Gy iso-dose regions, and conversely, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> decreased for the rectum. There was a marked difference in the mean bladder-to-rectum LET<sub>D</sub> ratios between anterior oblique, lateral opposing and posterior oblique field configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A MC code allowing for accurate calculations of dose and LET<sub>D</sub> in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer was implemented and validated. The LET<sub>D</sub> distributions in the rectum and bladder showed a systematic dependence on the field configuration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质子治疗(PT)中的剂量平均线性能量转移(LETD)在临床前研究中与质子的相对生物学有效性(RBE)有关。直到最近,前列腺癌中最常见的PT给药方法是双分散PT, LETD只能通过专门的蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟来实现。然而,由于大多数关于双散射PT中LETD和RBE之间关系的研究都集中在头颈部区域,现有的MC实现无法计算较长视场范围的LETD,例如在骨盆区域。目的:本研究的最初目的是实现一个MC代码,允许在前列腺癌的双分散PT中计算LETD。此外,我们通过对双分散pt治疗的大型前列腺癌队列进行MC计算,探索了LETD剖面和LETD作为视场配置的函数。方法:用于提供扩展视场范围的被动分散临床治疗喷嘴的组件,以及两个相关的调制轮,被实现到现有的FLUKA MC框架中用于LETD计算。经过验证,该代码可以分散使用11种不同范围和调制宽度配置的处理喷嘴进行的Bragg峰(SOBP)测量。验证后,计算582例双视野双散射PT治疗前列腺癌患者的计划计算机断层上的LETD分布。所有患者的视野构型相对于矢状面对称,有一对后斜、侧对或前斜视野。比较三组患者的剂量、LETD容积参数及膀胱和直肠平均LETD比值。结果:用于校准的所有SOBP场景的范围差异均小于1 mm。在11个SOBP场景中,有9个场景的调制宽度差异低于2毫米。对于患者模拟,PTV、膀胱和直肠的平均γ及格率(3mm /3%)至少为98%。与前后场构型相比,膀胱的平均LETD在10 Gy和70 Gy等剂量区域均有所增加,相反,直肠的平均LETD则有所下降。在前斜、侧对位和后斜场构型中,平均膀胱-直肠LETD比值有显著差异。结论:实现并验证了一种能够精确计算前列腺癌双分散放射治疗剂量和LETD的MC代码。直肠和膀胱的LETD分布与场构型有系统的依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling of a double-scattering proton therapy nozzle using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and analysis of linear energy transfer in patients treated for prostate cancer.

Background: The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETD) in proton therapy (PT) has in pre-clinical studies been linked to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. Until recently, the most common PT delivery method in prostate cancer has been double-scattered PT, with LETD only available through dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, as most studies of the relationship between LETD and RBE in double scattered PT have been focused on the head and neck region, existing MC implementations have not been capable of calculating LETD for the longer field ranges used, for example, in the pelvic region.

Purpose: The initial aim of this study was to implement a MC code allowing for LETD calculations in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer. Additionally, we explored LETD profiles and LETD as a function of field configuration, by performing MC calculations for a large prostate cancer cohort treated with double-scattered PT.

Methods: The components of a passive scattered clinical treatment nozzle used for delivery of extended field ranges, with two associated modulation wheels, were implemented into an existing FLUKA MC framework for LETD calculations. The code was validated to spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) measurements conducted using the treatment nozzle with 11 different range and modulation width configurations. After validation, LETD distributions were calculated on the planning computed tomographies of 582 prostate cancer patients treated with two-field double-scattered PT. All patients had symmetric field configurations with respect to the sagittal plane, with one pair of posterior oblique, lateral opposing, or anterior oblique fields. Dose and LETD volume parameters and the mean LETD ratio between the bladder and rectum were compared across the three groups.

Results: The range differences were below 1 mm for all SOBP scenarios used for calibration. For 9 of 11 SOBP scenarios, the modulation width differences were below 2 mm. For the patient simulations, the mean gamma pass rates (3 mm/3%) were at least 98% in the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Comparing anterior to posterior field configurations, the mean LETD in the bladder increased within both the 10 and 70 Gy iso-dose regions, and conversely, the mean LETD decreased for the rectum. There was a marked difference in the mean bladder-to-rectum LETD ratios between anterior oblique, lateral opposing and posterior oblique field configurations.

Conclusion: A MC code allowing for accurate calculations of dose and LETD in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer was implemented and validated. The LETD distributions in the rectum and bladder showed a systematic dependence on the field configuration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信