利用基于直线集成cbct的聚合物凝胶剂量学评估放射外科虚拟锥技术的剂量学和空间精度。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tenzin Kunkyab, Michael Lamey, Andrew Jirasek, Michael Kudla, Nathan Becker, Benjamin Mou, Derek Hyde
{"title":"利用基于直线集成cbct的聚合物凝胶剂量学评估放射外科虚拟锥技术的剂量学和空间精度。","authors":"Tenzin Kunkyab, Michael Lamey, Andrew Jirasek, Michael Kudla, Nathan Becker, Benjamin Mou, Derek Hyde","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the dosimetric and geometric precision of a virtual cone technique using CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry, enabling radiation delivery, and imaging readout within an identical spatial coordinate system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a C# script for a virtual cone technique that generates a treatment plan with 10 gantry arcs at 0°, 36°, 72°, 288°, and 324° couch angles, with 2 arcs per couch angle using 45° and 135° collimator angles. Two verification plans using Eclipse v15.6 (AcurosXB) were created with 20 Gy at the maximum dose for: (1) a cylindrical gel, with an additional calibration region; (2) a 3D printed anthropomorphic skull phantom with a gel insert. The 50% isodose (10 Gy) width through the central axis of the axial and sagittal planes (SPs) were measured for the gel experiment. The distance between the centers-of-masses of the 10 Gy isodose region of the plan and the gel (skull phantom) were calculated for an end-to-end spatial accuracy test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum point dose measured with gel was within 1% of the plan, though the gel measured 50% isodose widths of 5.56 <math> <semantics><mrow><mspace></mspace> <mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$\\; \\pm \\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.02 mm, 5.65  <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$ \\pm \\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.04 mm, 4.23  <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$ \\pm \\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.01 mm for axial (anterior-posterior), axial (left-right), sagittal (superior-inferior) respectively, which were slightly narrower than Eclipse (1.29 mm maximum difference in the SP due to CBCT slice thickness). The center-of-mass distance was 0.66 mm for the gel experiment, and 0.94 mm for complete end-to-end testing with the anthropomorphic phantom, including CBCT setup (kV-MV isocenter uncertainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 50% isodose width of the gel measurement was 5.15 mm (mean), which was tighter than our Eclipse v15.6 beam model. The end-to-end spatial accuracy test, only achievable with gel dosimetry using CBCT readout, resulted in sub-millimeter accuracy. This study demonstrates the value of gel dosimetry in verifying the dosimetric and spatial accuracy of this high precision, stereotactic technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of dosimetric and spatial accuracy of a virtual cone technique for radiosurgery using linac-integrated CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry.\",\"authors\":\"Tenzin Kunkyab, Michael Lamey, Andrew Jirasek, Michael Kudla, Nathan Becker, Benjamin Mou, Derek Hyde\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the dosimetric and geometric precision of a virtual cone technique using CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry, enabling radiation delivery, and imaging readout within an identical spatial coordinate system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a C# script for a virtual cone technique that generates a treatment plan with 10 gantry arcs at 0°, 36°, 72°, 288°, and 324° couch angles, with 2 arcs per couch angle using 45° and 135° collimator angles. Two verification plans using Eclipse v15.6 (AcurosXB) were created with 20 Gy at the maximum dose for: (1) a cylindrical gel, with an additional calibration region; (2) a 3D printed anthropomorphic skull phantom with a gel insert. The 50% isodose (10 Gy) width through the central axis of the axial and sagittal planes (SPs) were measured for the gel experiment. The distance between the centers-of-masses of the 10 Gy isodose region of the plan and the gel (skull phantom) were calculated for an end-to-end spatial accuracy test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum point dose measured with gel was within 1% of the plan, though the gel measured 50% isodose widths of 5.56 <math> <semantics><mrow><mspace></mspace> <mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$\\\\; \\\\pm \\\\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.02 mm, 5.65  <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$ \\\\pm \\\\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.04 mm, 4.23  <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mspace></mspace></mrow> <annotation>$ \\\\pm \\\\;$</annotation></semantics> </math> 0.01 mm for axial (anterior-posterior), axial (left-right), sagittal (superior-inferior) respectively, which were slightly narrower than Eclipse (1.29 mm maximum difference in the SP due to CBCT slice thickness). The center-of-mass distance was 0.66 mm for the gel experiment, and 0.94 mm for complete end-to-end testing with the anthropomorphic phantom, including CBCT setup (kV-MV isocenter uncertainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 50% isodose width of the gel measurement was 5.15 mm (mean), which was tighter than our Eclipse v15.6 beam model. The end-to-end spatial accuracy test, only achievable with gel dosimetry using CBCT readout, resulted in sub-millimeter accuracy. This study demonstrates the value of gel dosimetry in verifying the dosimetric and spatial accuracy of this high precision, stereotactic technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究使用基于cbct的聚合物凝胶剂量法评估虚拟锥技术的剂量学和几何精度,使辐射传递和成像读数在相同的空间坐标系内。方法:我们为虚拟锥体技术创建了一个c#脚本,该脚本生成了一个治疗计划,该计划包含10个龙门弧线,分别为0°、36°、72°、288°和324°倾角,每个倾角有2个弧线,使用45°和135°准直角。使用Eclipse v15.6 (AcurosXB)创建了两个验证计划,最大剂量为20 Gy,用于:(1)圆柱形凝胶,具有额外的校准区域;(2)带有凝胶插入物的3D打印拟人化头骨幻影。在凝胶实验中,测量了通过轴向和矢状面(SPs)中轴线的50%等剂量(10 Gy)宽度。计划的10 Gy等剂量区域的质心与凝胶(颅骨幻影)之间的距离被计算为端到端的空间精度测试。结果:凝胶测得的最大点剂量在计划的1%以内,凝胶测得的50%等剂量宽度为5.56±$\;\pm \;$ 0.02 mm, 5.65±$ \pm \;$ 0.04 mm, 4.23±$ \pm \;$ 0.01 mm分别为轴向(前后),轴向(左右),矢状(上下),比Eclipse略窄(由于CBCT层厚,SP最大差异为1.29 mm)。凝胶实验的质心距离为0.66 mm,拟人化幻影的完整端到端测试的质心距离为0.94 mm,包括CBCT设置(kV-MV等中心不确定度)。结论:凝胶测量的50%等剂量宽度为5.15 mm(平均),比我们的Eclipse v15.6光束模型更紧。端到端空间精度测试只能通过使用CBCT读数的凝胶剂量学来实现,其精度达到亚毫米。本研究证明了凝胶剂量学在验证这种高精度立体定向技术的剂量学和空间准确性方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of dosimetric and spatial accuracy of a virtual cone technique for radiosurgery using linac-integrated CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry.

Purpose: This study evaluates the dosimetric and geometric precision of a virtual cone technique using CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry, enabling radiation delivery, and imaging readout within an identical spatial coordinate system.

Methods: We created a C# script for a virtual cone technique that generates a treatment plan with 10 gantry arcs at 0°, 36°, 72°, 288°, and 324° couch angles, with 2 arcs per couch angle using 45° and 135° collimator angles. Two verification plans using Eclipse v15.6 (AcurosXB) were created with 20 Gy at the maximum dose for: (1) a cylindrical gel, with an additional calibration region; (2) a 3D printed anthropomorphic skull phantom with a gel insert. The 50% isodose (10 Gy) width through the central axis of the axial and sagittal planes (SPs) were measured for the gel experiment. The distance between the centers-of-masses of the 10 Gy isodose region of the plan and the gel (skull phantom) were calculated for an end-to-end spatial accuracy test.

Results: The maximum point dose measured with gel was within 1% of the plan, though the gel measured 50% isodose widths of 5.56 ± $\; \pm \;$ 0.02 mm, 5.65  ± $ \pm \;$ 0.04 mm, 4.23  ± $ \pm \;$ 0.01 mm for axial (anterior-posterior), axial (left-right), sagittal (superior-inferior) respectively, which were slightly narrower than Eclipse (1.29 mm maximum difference in the SP due to CBCT slice thickness). The center-of-mass distance was 0.66 mm for the gel experiment, and 0.94 mm for complete end-to-end testing with the anthropomorphic phantom, including CBCT setup (kV-MV isocenter uncertainty).

Conclusion: The 50% isodose width of the gel measurement was 5.15 mm (mean), which was tighter than our Eclipse v15.6 beam model. The end-to-end spatial accuracy test, only achievable with gel dosimetry using CBCT readout, resulted in sub-millimeter accuracy. This study demonstrates the value of gel dosimetry in verifying the dosimetric and spatial accuracy of this high precision, stereotactic technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信