外科医生人口统计学因素在L4-5级腰椎滑脱治疗中的作用:AO脊柱知识论坛退行性调查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sathish Muthu, Samuel K Simister, Hania Shahzad, Hai Van Le, Luca Ambrosio, Stipe Corluka, Gianluca Vadala, Patrick C Hsieh, Michael Virk, Tim Yoon, Samuel K Cho, Ao Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
{"title":"外科医生人口统计学因素在L4-5级腰椎滑脱治疗中的作用:AO脊柱知识论坛退行性调查。","authors":"Sathish Muthu, Samuel K Simister, Hania Shahzad, Hai Van Le, Luca Ambrosio, Stipe Corluka, Gianluca Vadala, Patrick C Hsieh, Michael Virk, Tim Yoon, Samuel K Cho, Ao Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative","doi":"10.1177/21925682251324469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveWe explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).MethodsA survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders.ResultsAfter dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251324469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Surgeon Demographic Factors in the Management of L4-5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis: A Survey by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative.\",\"authors\":\"Sathish Muthu, Samuel K Simister, Hania Shahzad, Hai Van Le, Luca Ambrosio, Stipe Corluka, Gianluca Vadala, Patrick C Hsieh, Michael Virk, Tim Yoon, Samuel K Cho, Ao Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251324469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveWe explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).MethodsA survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders.ResultsAfter dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251324469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251324469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251324469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计横断面调查。目的探讨在L4-5级退行性腰椎滑脱(DLS)治疗决策中外科医生的人口学因素。方法对全球AOSpine会员进行调查,分析三种不同程度神经压迫和不稳定的DLS临床情况,以确定手术治疗的选择。向应答者介绍了诸如仅减压或减压融合等管理选择和将采用的技术。结果479名外科医生参与了调查。在所有三种情况下,无论有无神经功能缺损,直接减压都是首选(82.5%,81.2%和56.8%),大多数人倾向于开放手术而不是微创或内窥镜手术。值得注意的是,年轻的、经验不足的、接受过奖学金培训的外科医生更倾向于微创和间接减压方法。与减压相比,更倾向于手术融合(分别为75.2、92.5和86.6%),这也反映了人们对实现节段稳定性的普遍共识。结论:本研究结果表明,在治疗L4-5级I级DLS时,一组全球外科医生明显倾向于直接减压融合。这表明在实现减压和稳定方面达成了共识;然而,有一些趋势表明基于年龄、经验和治疗提供者培训的手术管理的影响。这些研究结果表明,外科干预措施正朝着微创技术的方向发展,尤其是在年轻外科医生中,这突出了在DLS管理中采用创新方法的全球教育的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Surgeon Demographic Factors in the Management of L4-5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis: A Survey by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative.

Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveWe explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).MethodsA survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders.ResultsAfter dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信