基于贝叶斯决策模型的鼻咽癌自适应放疗触发。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Long Yang, Xiaojie Yin, Zhenhao Li, Zhiyu Ding, Yue Zou, Ziwei Li, Enwei Mo, Qingyuan Zhou, Jiazhou Wang, Weigang Hu
{"title":"基于贝叶斯决策模型的鼻咽癌自适应放疗触发。","authors":"Long Yang, Xiaojie Yin, Zhenhao Li, Zhiyu Ding, Yue Zou, Ziwei Li, Enwei Mo, Qingyuan Zhou, Jiazhou Wang, Weigang Hu","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adc238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>To develop a Bayesian decision model for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) that balances clinical capacity of ART and inter-fraction dosimetric changes.<i>Approach.</i>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 fractions from 17 NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a CT-Linac. Fourteen patients were included for the model construction, and three for validation. Daily diagnostic-level CT images were rigidly registered to the planning CT for regions of interest and treatment plan propagation. The propagated contours were reviewed and refined by radiation oncologists. For each daily CT, percentage differences in 27 dose metrics were compared to the original plan. Composite scores of dose differences were developed using factor analysis on planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) dose metrics. These scores were integrated into a Bayesian decision model, which incorporated a subjective trigger rate to determine the initiation of ART.<i>Main results.</i>The model generated individualized re-plan strategies based on composite scores for PTV or OAR, with trigger rates ranging from 10% to 60%. In the validation with 14 fractions, significant anatomical and dosimetric variations were identified. At a 30% trigger rate, only one fraction was misclassified.<i>Significance.</i>It is feasible to employ a Bayesian decision model for ART, merging subjective clinical insights with objective dosimetric data to refine re-planning decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive radiotherapy triggering for nasopharyngeal cancer based on bayesian decision model.\",\"authors\":\"Long Yang, Xiaojie Yin, Zhenhao Li, Zhiyu Ding, Yue Zou, Ziwei Li, Enwei Mo, Qingyuan Zhou, Jiazhou Wang, Weigang Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adc238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>To develop a Bayesian decision model for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) that balances clinical capacity of ART and inter-fraction dosimetric changes.<i>Approach.</i>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 fractions from 17 NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a CT-Linac. Fourteen patients were included for the model construction, and three for validation. Daily diagnostic-level CT images were rigidly registered to the planning CT for regions of interest and treatment plan propagation. The propagated contours were reviewed and refined by radiation oncologists. For each daily CT, percentage differences in 27 dose metrics were compared to the original plan. Composite scores of dose differences were developed using factor analysis on planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) dose metrics. These scores were integrated into a Bayesian decision model, which incorporated a subjective trigger rate to determine the initiation of ART.<i>Main results.</i>The model generated individualized re-plan strategies based on composite scores for PTV or OAR, with trigger rates ranging from 10% to 60%. In the validation with 14 fractions, significant anatomical and dosimetric variations were identified. At a 30% trigger rate, only one fraction was misclassified.<i>Significance.</i>It is feasible to employ a Bayesian decision model for ART, merging subjective clinical insights with objective dosimetric data to refine re-planning decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立鼻咽癌(NPC)适应性放疗(ART)的贝叶斯决策模型,以平衡ART的临床能力和剂量变化。材料与方法:采用CT-Linac对17例鼻咽癌(NPC)调强放疗(IMRT)患者的84个部位进行回顾性分析。14例患者用于模型构建,3例用于验证。日常诊断级CT图像严格注册到计划CT的兴趣区域(roi)和治疗计划传播。放射肿瘤学家对传播轮廓进行了审查和改进。对于每日CT,比较27个剂量指标与原计划的百分比差异。利用计划靶体积(PTV)和器官危险(OAR)剂量指标的因子分析,建立剂量差异的综合评分。这些评分被整合到贝叶斯决策模型中,该模型包含主观触发率来确定ART的启动。结果:该模型根据PTV或OAR的综合评分生成个性化的重新计划策略,触发率从10%到60%不等。在14个馏分的验证中,发现了显著的解剖和剂量变化。在30%的触发率下,只有一部分被错误分类。 ;结论:采用贝叶斯决策模型进行适应性放疗是可行的,将主观临床见解与客观剂量学数据相结合,以完善重新规划决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptive radiotherapy triggering for nasopharyngeal cancer based on bayesian decision model.

Objective.To develop a Bayesian decision model for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) that balances clinical capacity of ART and inter-fraction dosimetric changes.Approach.A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 fractions from 17 NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a CT-Linac. Fourteen patients were included for the model construction, and three for validation. Daily diagnostic-level CT images were rigidly registered to the planning CT for regions of interest and treatment plan propagation. The propagated contours were reviewed and refined by radiation oncologists. For each daily CT, percentage differences in 27 dose metrics were compared to the original plan. Composite scores of dose differences were developed using factor analysis on planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) dose metrics. These scores were integrated into a Bayesian decision model, which incorporated a subjective trigger rate to determine the initiation of ART.Main results.The model generated individualized re-plan strategies based on composite scores for PTV or OAR, with trigger rates ranging from 10% to 60%. In the validation with 14 fractions, significant anatomical and dosimetric variations were identified. At a 30% trigger rate, only one fraction was misclassified.Significance.It is feasible to employ a Bayesian decision model for ART, merging subjective clinical insights with objective dosimetric data to refine re-planning decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信