日本食道学会认证医院食管癌患者食管切除术前康复现状

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tsuyoshi Harada, Tetsuya Tsuji, Takuya Fukushima, Nobuko Konishi, Hiroki Nakajima, Katsuyoshi Suzuki, Tomohiro Ikeda, Shusuke Toyama, Keiji Matsumori, Takumi Yanagisawa, Kakeru Hashimoto, Hitoshi Kagaya, Sadamoto Zenda, Takashi Kojima, Takeo Fujita, Junya Ueno, Nanako Hijikata, Aiko Ishikawa, Ryuichi Hayashi
{"title":"日本食道学会认证医院食管癌患者食管切除术前康复现状","authors":"Tsuyoshi Harada, Tetsuya Tsuji, Takuya Fukushima, Nobuko Konishi, Hiroki Nakajima, Katsuyoshi Suzuki, Tomohiro Ikeda, Shusuke Toyama, Keiji Matsumori, Takumi Yanagisawa, Kakeru Hashimoto, Hitoshi Kagaya, Sadamoto Zenda, Takashi Kojima, Takeo Fujita, Junya Ueno, Nanako Hijikata, Aiko Ishikawa, Ryuichi Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation has been shown to prevent postoperative pneumonia and physical function decline after esophagectomy in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, the implementation status of prehabilitation for esophagectomy remains unknown. This nationwide survey was performed to investigate the current status of and barriers to prehabilitation before esophagectomy among Japanese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter nationwide survey was performed using the postal mail method. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified as Authorized Institutes for Board-Certified Esophageal Surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society within the past 10 years. We administered the original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy, excluding neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). The number of facilities providing prehabilitation for esophagectomy was 77 (66%), including prehabilitation in the preoperative outpatient setting in 39 (33%) and in the preoperative inpatient setting in 53 (45%). Among the facilities that did not provide prehabilitation, the most common reasons for not providing prehabilitation (i.e., responses of \"agree\" and \"strongly agree\" on questionnaire) were a lack of human resources, preoperative period too short to provide prehabilitation, difficultly using reimbursed medical fees, and no establishment of a standard prehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We elucidated the current implementation status of prehabilitation, identified the critical gap between evidence and practice. This information will contribute to building an effective medical system and framework of prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan and other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer among board-certified hospitals by the Japan Esophageal Society.\",\"authors\":\"Tsuyoshi Harada, Tetsuya Tsuji, Takuya Fukushima, Nobuko Konishi, Hiroki Nakajima, Katsuyoshi Suzuki, Tomohiro Ikeda, Shusuke Toyama, Keiji Matsumori, Takumi Yanagisawa, Kakeru Hashimoto, Hitoshi Kagaya, Sadamoto Zenda, Takashi Kojima, Takeo Fujita, Junya Ueno, Nanako Hijikata, Aiko Ishikawa, Ryuichi Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation has been shown to prevent postoperative pneumonia and physical function decline after esophagectomy in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, the implementation status of prehabilitation for esophagectomy remains unknown. This nationwide survey was performed to investigate the current status of and barriers to prehabilitation before esophagectomy among Japanese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter nationwide survey was performed using the postal mail method. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified as Authorized Institutes for Board-Certified Esophageal Surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society within the past 10 years. We administered the original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy, excluding neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). The number of facilities providing prehabilitation for esophagectomy was 77 (66%), including prehabilitation in the preoperative outpatient setting in 39 (33%) and in the preoperative inpatient setting in 53 (45%). Among the facilities that did not provide prehabilitation, the most common reasons for not providing prehabilitation (i.e., responses of \\\"agree\\\" and \\\"strongly agree\\\" on questionnaire) were a lack of human resources, preoperative period too short to provide prehabilitation, difficultly using reimbursed medical fees, and no establishment of a standard prehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We elucidated the current implementation status of prehabilitation, identified the critical gap between evidence and practice. This information will contribute to building an effective medical system and framework of prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan and other countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-025-01121-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在最近的系统综述和荟萃分析中,预康复已被证明可以预防食管切除术后的肺炎和身体功能下降。然而,食管切除术前康复的实施情况尚不清楚。本全国性调查旨在调查日本医院食管切除术前康复的现状和障碍。方法:采用邮寄方式进行全国多中心调查。符合条件的机构是155家日本医院,这些医院在过去10年内被日本食道学会认证为食道外科医师委员会认证的授权机构。我们使用原始问卷调查食管切除术前的康复现状,不包括新辅助治疗。结果:应答率为75%(117/155)。提供食管切除术预康复的机构数量为77家(66%),其中术前门诊预康复39家(33%),术前住院预康复53家(45%)。在不提供康复的机构中,最常见的不提供康复的原因(即在问卷中回答“同意”和“非常同意”)是缺乏人力资源,术前时间太短无法提供康复,难以使用报销的医疗费用,以及没有建立标准的康复方案。结论:我们阐明了目前康复的实施状况,确定了证据与实践之间的关键差距。这些信息将有助于在日本和其他国家建立有效的食管癌患者康复医疗体系和框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer among board-certified hospitals by the Japan Esophageal Society.

Background: Prehabilitation has been shown to prevent postoperative pneumonia and physical function decline after esophagectomy in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, the implementation status of prehabilitation for esophagectomy remains unknown. This nationwide survey was performed to investigate the current status of and barriers to prehabilitation before esophagectomy among Japanese hospitals.

Methods: This multicenter nationwide survey was performed using the postal mail method. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified as Authorized Institutes for Board-Certified Esophageal Surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society within the past 10 years. We administered the original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation before esophagectomy, excluding neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). The number of facilities providing prehabilitation for esophagectomy was 77 (66%), including prehabilitation in the preoperative outpatient setting in 39 (33%) and in the preoperative inpatient setting in 53 (45%). Among the facilities that did not provide prehabilitation, the most common reasons for not providing prehabilitation (i.e., responses of "agree" and "strongly agree" on questionnaire) were a lack of human resources, preoperative period too short to provide prehabilitation, difficultly using reimbursed medical fees, and no establishment of a standard prehabilitation program.

Conclusions: We elucidated the current implementation status of prehabilitation, identified the critical gap between evidence and practice. This information will contribute to building an effective medical system and framework of prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan and other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信