介绍贝叶斯统计:部分36对科学出版物的评估系列。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joachim Werner Otto Gerß, Reinhard Vonthein
{"title":"介绍贝叶斯统计:部分36对科学出版物的评估系列。","authors":"Joachim Werner Otto Gerß, Reinhard Vonthein","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The analysis of a study with Bayesian statistics makes use of additional information to supplement the new study data. In this review, we explain the principles of the application of this method in clinical research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The concept of Bayesian statistics is introduced and explained with the aid of an illustrative example from a drug approval study. Its major aspects are discussed. The existing prior knowledge is formulated as a probability distribution of an odds ratio. Multiple scenarios are shown to demonstrate how a suitable prior distribution is determined and how it can affect the final result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian statistics makes use of prior knowledge, e.g., the findings of earlier clinical trials, and combines the prior probability distribution with the findings of the current study for statistical analysis. The suitability and applicability of the prior knowledge in question must be assessed and the prior knowledge weighted accordingly, and any uncertainties must be taken into account in the analysis. The result that is derived is called the posterior distribution of the parameters of interest and is summarized in terms of point estimators and credibility intervals. In contrast to classical statistics, results of this type permit direct quantitative statements on the probability of parameter values and on the probabilities of the null and alternative hypotheses (in one-sided statistical tests).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the current study findings with prior knowledge can enable the more precise estimation of a treatment effect, or else lessen the number of subjects needed for a clinical trial. Central elements of Bayesian statistics are the selection and weighting of prior knowledge; subjective judgements must be made. Bayesian techniques require a precise description of the methods applied, meticulous study of the available literature, and experience in the mathematical representation of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"271-276"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Bayesian Statistics: Part 36 of a Series on the Evaluation of Scientific Publications.\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Werner Otto Gerß, Reinhard Vonthein\",\"doi\":\"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The analysis of a study with Bayesian statistics makes use of additional information to supplement the new study data. In this review, we explain the principles of the application of this method in clinical research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The concept of Bayesian statistics is introduced and explained with the aid of an illustrative example from a drug approval study. Its major aspects are discussed. The existing prior knowledge is formulated as a probability distribution of an odds ratio. Multiple scenarios are shown to demonstrate how a suitable prior distribution is determined and how it can affect the final result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian statistics makes use of prior knowledge, e.g., the findings of earlier clinical trials, and combines the prior probability distribution with the findings of the current study for statistical analysis. The suitability and applicability of the prior knowledge in question must be assessed and the prior knowledge weighted accordingly, and any uncertainties must be taken into account in the analysis. The result that is derived is called the posterior distribution of the parameters of interest and is summarized in terms of point estimators and credibility intervals. In contrast to classical statistics, results of this type permit direct quantitative statements on the probability of parameter values and on the probabilities of the null and alternative hypotheses (in one-sided statistical tests).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the current study findings with prior knowledge can enable the more precise estimation of a treatment effect, or else lessen the number of subjects needed for a clinical trial. Central elements of Bayesian statistics are the selection and weighting of prior knowledge; subjective judgements must be made. Bayesian techniques require a precise description of the methods applied, meticulous study of the available literature, and experience in the mathematical representation of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"volume\":\" Forthcoming\",\"pages\":\"271-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利用贝叶斯统计对一项研究进行分析,利用额外的信息来补充新的研究数据。本文就该方法在临床研究中的应用原则作一综述。方法:介绍贝叶斯统计的概念,并结合某药品审批研究的实例进行说明。讨论了其主要方面。现有的先验知识被表述为一个比值比的概率分布。展示了多个场景,以演示如何确定合适的先验分布以及它如何影响最终结果。结果:贝叶斯统计利用先验知识,如早期临床试验的结果,将先验概率分布与当前研究结果相结合,进行统计分析。必须评估所讨论的先验知识的适宜性和适用性,并对先验知识进行相应的加权,在分析中必须考虑到任何不确定性。得到的结果称为感兴趣参数的后验分布,用点估计量和可信区间来概括。与经典统计相反,这种类型的结果允许对参数值的概率以及零假设和备选假设的概率(在单侧统计检验中)进行直接定量陈述。结论:将当前的研究结果与先前的知识相结合,可以更精确地估计治疗效果,或者减少临床试验所需的受试者数量。贝叶斯统计的核心要素是先验知识的选择和加权;必须做出主观判断。贝叶斯技术需要对所应用的方法进行精确的描述,对现有文献进行细致的研究,以及对结果进行数学表示的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to Bayesian Statistics: Part 36 of a Series on the Evaluation of Scientific Publications.

Background: The analysis of a study with Bayesian statistics makes use of additional information to supplement the new study data. In this review, we explain the principles of the application of this method in clinical research.

Methods: The concept of Bayesian statistics is introduced and explained with the aid of an illustrative example from a drug approval study. Its major aspects are discussed. The existing prior knowledge is formulated as a probability distribution of an odds ratio. Multiple scenarios are shown to demonstrate how a suitable prior distribution is determined and how it can affect the final result.

Results: Bayesian statistics makes use of prior knowledge, e.g., the findings of earlier clinical trials, and combines the prior probability distribution with the findings of the current study for statistical analysis. The suitability and applicability of the prior knowledge in question must be assessed and the prior knowledge weighted accordingly, and any uncertainties must be taken into account in the analysis. The result that is derived is called the posterior distribution of the parameters of interest and is summarized in terms of point estimators and credibility intervals. In contrast to classical statistics, results of this type permit direct quantitative statements on the probability of parameter values and on the probabilities of the null and alternative hypotheses (in one-sided statistical tests).

Conclusion: Combining the current study findings with prior knowledge can enable the more precise estimation of a treatment effect, or else lessen the number of subjects needed for a clinical trial. Central elements of Bayesian statistics are the selection and weighting of prior knowledge; subjective judgements must be made. Bayesian techniques require a precise description of the methods applied, meticulous study of the available literature, and experience in the mathematical representation of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信