农村医院事故指挥领导对备灾的认知。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jason P Murphy, Clara Bergström, Lina Gyllencruetz
{"title":"农村医院事故指挥领导对备灾的认知。","authors":"Jason P Murphy, Clara Bergström, Lina Gyllencruetz","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01201-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trends indicate that the frequency of major incidents (MIs) is increasing. Healthcare systems are vital actors in societies' responses to MIs. Well-prepared healthcare systems may mitigate the effects of MIs. Disaster preparedness is based on region-specific risk and vulnerability analyses (RVAs). Hospital incident command groups (HICGs) are commonly formed per hospital's contingency plan MI to aid in disaster response. Acquiring situational awareness and decision-making in the face of uncertainty are known challenges for HICGs during MIs. However, the remoteness of rural hospitals presents unique challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore HICG leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with semi-structured, focus group, and individual interviews was used. The data were analyzed through inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis generated the main category, HICGs' confidence in handling major incidents and four categories. These were Uncertainty and level of recognition (containing two subcategories); Awareness of challenges and risks (containing two subcategories); Factors that facilitate preparedness, response, and leadership (containing three subcategories); and Prerequisites for decision-making (containing three subcategories and four subcategories).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HICG leaders generally perceived their hospital's disaster preparedness as adequate. However, preparedness was found to be influenced by several factors. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing preparedness and response, particularly highlighting challenges related to geographical isolation and resource constraints. Effective preparedness requires a comprehensive understanding of local contexts, hospital capabilities, and risks, which directly impacts training, decision-making, and resource allocation. Addressing the identified vulnerabilities necessitates targeted interventions focused on situational awareness, decision-making, collaboration, and training.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural hospital incident command leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Jason P Murphy, Clara Bergström, Lina Gyllencruetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01201-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trends indicate that the frequency of major incidents (MIs) is increasing. Healthcare systems are vital actors in societies' responses to MIs. Well-prepared healthcare systems may mitigate the effects of MIs. Disaster preparedness is based on region-specific risk and vulnerability analyses (RVAs). Hospital incident command groups (HICGs) are commonly formed per hospital's contingency plan MI to aid in disaster response. Acquiring situational awareness and decision-making in the face of uncertainty are known challenges for HICGs during MIs. However, the remoteness of rural hospitals presents unique challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore HICG leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with semi-structured, focus group, and individual interviews was used. The data were analyzed through inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis generated the main category, HICGs' confidence in handling major incidents and four categories. These were Uncertainty and level of recognition (containing two subcategories); Awareness of challenges and risks (containing two subcategories); Factors that facilitate preparedness, response, and leadership (containing three subcategories); and Prerequisites for decision-making (containing three subcategories and four subcategories).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HICG leaders generally perceived their hospital's disaster preparedness as adequate. However, preparedness was found to be influenced by several factors. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing preparedness and response, particularly highlighting challenges related to geographical isolation and resource constraints. Effective preparedness requires a comprehensive understanding of local contexts, hospital capabilities, and risks, which directly impacts training, decision-making, and resource allocation. Addressing the identified vulnerabilities necessitates targeted interventions focused on situational awareness, decision-making, collaboration, and training.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01201-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01201-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的趋势表明,重大事件(MIs)的频率正在增加。卫生保健系统是社会应对MIs的重要行为体。准备充分的医疗保健系统可以减轻MIs的影响。备灾是基于特定区域的风险和脆弱性分析。医院事故指挥小组(hicg)通常根据医院的应急计划MI成立,以协助应对灾害。在MIs中,面对不确定性获取态势感知和决策是hicg面临的已知挑战。然而,偏远的农村医院带来了独特的挑战。目的:本研究的目的是探讨HICG领导人对农村医院备灾的看法。方法:采用半结构化、焦点小组和个别访谈相结合的定性研究方法。采用归纳内容分析法对数据进行分析。结果:分析产生了主要类别、hicg处理重大事件的信心和四个类别。这些是不确定性和识别水平(包含两个子类别);对挑战和风险的认识(包含两个子类);促进准备、反应和领导的因素(包含三个子类);决策的先决条件(包含三个子类别和四个子类别)。结论:HICG领导普遍认为他们医院的备灾工作是充分的。然而,人们发现准备工作受到几个因素的影响。调查结果显示,影响备灾和应对的因素之间存在复杂的相互作用,特别突出了与地理隔离和资源限制有关的挑战。有效的准备需要全面了解当地情况、医院能力和风险,这直接影响培训、决策和资源分配。解决已确定的脆弱性需要有针对性的干预措施,重点是态势感知、决策、协作和培训。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural hospital incident command leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness.

Background: Recent trends indicate that the frequency of major incidents (MIs) is increasing. Healthcare systems are vital actors in societies' responses to MIs. Well-prepared healthcare systems may mitigate the effects of MIs. Disaster preparedness is based on region-specific risk and vulnerability analyses (RVAs). Hospital incident command groups (HICGs) are commonly formed per hospital's contingency plan MI to aid in disaster response. Acquiring situational awareness and decision-making in the face of uncertainty are known challenges for HICGs during MIs. However, the remoteness of rural hospitals presents unique challenges.

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore HICG leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals.

Methods: A qualitative study with semi-structured, focus group, and individual interviews was used. The data were analyzed through inductive content analysis.

Results: The analysis generated the main category, HICGs' confidence in handling major incidents and four categories. These were Uncertainty and level of recognition (containing two subcategories); Awareness of challenges and risks (containing two subcategories); Factors that facilitate preparedness, response, and leadership (containing three subcategories); and Prerequisites for decision-making (containing three subcategories and four subcategories).

Conclusions: HICG leaders generally perceived their hospital's disaster preparedness as adequate. However, preparedness was found to be influenced by several factors. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing preparedness and response, particularly highlighting challenges related to geographical isolation and resource constraints. Effective preparedness requires a comprehensive understanding of local contexts, hospital capabilities, and risks, which directly impacts training, decision-making, and resource allocation. Addressing the identified vulnerabilities necessitates targeted interventions focused on situational awareness, decision-making, collaboration, and training.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信