肢体截肢时的靶向肌肉神经移植减少阿片类镇痛治疗的长期使用和依赖:一项多中心倾向匹配研究

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jackson M Cathey, Kevin M Klifto, Justin L Anderson, Sean Y Li, Eliana B Saltzman, Neill Y Li
{"title":"肢体截肢时的靶向肌肉神经移植减少阿片类镇痛治疗的长期使用和依赖:一项多中心倾向匹配研究","authors":"Jackson M Cathey, Kevin M Klifto, Justin L Anderson, Sean Y Li, Eliana B Saltzman, Neill Y Li","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of primary targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) performed at the time of major limb amputation on long-term opioid use, opioid dependence, and neuropathic pain medication use compared to standard amputation.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Postoperative pain following major limb amputation is common, often leading to prolonged opioid use, dependence, and neuropathic pain. TMR, a surgical technique that redirects amputated nerves into motor targets, has been proposed as a method to reduce pain-related complications, but prior studies are limited by small sample sizes, single-center experiences, and insufficient follow-up data. This study utilizes a multicenter database to assess long-term outcomes of TMR compared to standard amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter query was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network to identify patients undergoing major limb amputation with or without TMR over 20 years. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable cohorts for analysis. Primary outcomes included opioid use, opioid dependence, neuropathic pain medication use, and stump-related complications, evaluated from 90 days to 3 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 43,890 patients, those undergoing primary TMR (n=644) had significantly lower risks of opioid use (RR=0.72; 95%CI [0.60, 0.86], P<0.001) and opioid dependence (RR=0.50; 95%CI [0.27, 0.92], P=0.023) compared to matched controls undergoing standard amputation (n=644). In the ischemia subgroup, TMR patients had a 41% lower risk of opioid use (RR=0.59; 95%CI [0.42, 0.83], P=0.002). No differences in neuropathic pain medication use or stump-related complications were observed between cohorts. Time-course analysis demonstrated persistent reductions in opioid use among TMR patients at all intervals from 3 months to 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary TMR at the time of major limb amputation significantly reduces long-term opioid use and dependence, particularly in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, without increasing the risk of stump-related complications. These findings support the broader adoption of TMR to improve postoperative outcomes in amputees.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation Reduces Long-Term Use and Dependence for Opioid Analgesic Therapy: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jackson M Cathey, Kevin M Klifto, Justin L Anderson, Sean Y Li, Eliana B Saltzman, Neill Y Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of primary targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) performed at the time of major limb amputation on long-term opioid use, opioid dependence, and neuropathic pain medication use compared to standard amputation.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Postoperative pain following major limb amputation is common, often leading to prolonged opioid use, dependence, and neuropathic pain. TMR, a surgical technique that redirects amputated nerves into motor targets, has been proposed as a method to reduce pain-related complications, but prior studies are limited by small sample sizes, single-center experiences, and insufficient follow-up data. This study utilizes a multicenter database to assess long-term outcomes of TMR compared to standard amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter query was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network to identify patients undergoing major limb amputation with or without TMR over 20 years. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable cohorts for analysis. Primary outcomes included opioid use, opioid dependence, neuropathic pain medication use, and stump-related complications, evaluated from 90 days to 3 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 43,890 patients, those undergoing primary TMR (n=644) had significantly lower risks of opioid use (RR=0.72; 95%CI [0.60, 0.86], P<0.001) and opioid dependence (RR=0.50; 95%CI [0.27, 0.92], P=0.023) compared to matched controls undergoing standard amputation (n=644). In the ischemia subgroup, TMR patients had a 41% lower risk of opioid use (RR=0.59; 95%CI [0.42, 0.83], P=0.002). No differences in neuropathic pain medication use or stump-related complications were observed between cohorts. Time-course analysis demonstrated persistent reductions in opioid use among TMR patients at all intervals from 3 months to 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary TMR at the time of major limb amputation significantly reduces long-term opioid use and dependence, particularly in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, without increasing the risk of stump-related complications. These findings support the broader adoption of TMR to improve postoperative outcomes in amputees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006697\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价与标准截肢相比,肢体截肢时进行原发性靶向肌肉神经移植(TMR)对长期阿片类药物使用、阿片类药物依赖和神经性止痛药使用的影响。摘要背景资料:主要肢体截肢术后疼痛是常见的,通常导致阿片类药物的长期使用、依赖和神经性疼痛。TMR是一种外科手术技术,将被切除的神经重新定向到运动目标,已被提出作为一种减少疼痛相关并发症的方法,但先前的研究受到样本量小、单中心经验和随访数据不足的限制。本研究利用多中心数据库来评估TMR与标准截肢的长期预后。方法:使用TriNetX研究网络进行多中心查询,以确定20年内接受或不接受TMR的主要肢体截肢患者。倾向评分匹配用于创建可比较的队列进行分析。主要结局包括阿片类药物使用、阿片类药物依赖、神经性止痛药使用和残肢相关并发症,评估时间为术后90天至3年。结果:在43,890例患者中,接受原发性TMR的患者(n=644)使用阿片类药物的风险显著降低(RR=0.72;95%CI [0.60, 0.86], p结论:主要肢体截肢时的首次TMR可显著减少阿片类药物的长期使用和依赖,特别是对肢体缺血患者,且不会增加残肢相关并发症的风险。这些发现支持更广泛地采用TMR来改善截肢者的术后预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation Reduces Long-Term Use and Dependence for Opioid Analgesic Therapy: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of primary targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) performed at the time of major limb amputation on long-term opioid use, opioid dependence, and neuropathic pain medication use compared to standard amputation.

Summary background data: Postoperative pain following major limb amputation is common, often leading to prolonged opioid use, dependence, and neuropathic pain. TMR, a surgical technique that redirects amputated nerves into motor targets, has been proposed as a method to reduce pain-related complications, but prior studies are limited by small sample sizes, single-center experiences, and insufficient follow-up data. This study utilizes a multicenter database to assess long-term outcomes of TMR compared to standard amputation.

Methods: A multicenter query was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network to identify patients undergoing major limb amputation with or without TMR over 20 years. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable cohorts for analysis. Primary outcomes included opioid use, opioid dependence, neuropathic pain medication use, and stump-related complications, evaluated from 90 days to 3 years postoperatively.

Results: Among 43,890 patients, those undergoing primary TMR (n=644) had significantly lower risks of opioid use (RR=0.72; 95%CI [0.60, 0.86], P<0.001) and opioid dependence (RR=0.50; 95%CI [0.27, 0.92], P=0.023) compared to matched controls undergoing standard amputation (n=644). In the ischemia subgroup, TMR patients had a 41% lower risk of opioid use (RR=0.59; 95%CI [0.42, 0.83], P=0.002). No differences in neuropathic pain medication use or stump-related complications were observed between cohorts. Time-course analysis demonstrated persistent reductions in opioid use among TMR patients at all intervals from 3 months to 3 years.

Conclusions: Primary TMR at the time of major limb amputation significantly reduces long-term opioid use and dependence, particularly in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, without increasing the risk of stump-related complications. These findings support the broader adoption of TMR to improve postoperative outcomes in amputees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信