用数据驱动的方法区分宇宙学模型

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
S. Vilardi, S. Capozziello, M. Brescia
{"title":"用数据驱动的方法区分宇宙学模型","authors":"S. Vilardi, S. Capozziello, M. Brescia","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202451779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context.<i/> This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features.<i>Aims.<i/> The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques.<i>Methods.<i/> Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three.<i>Results.<i/> Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection.<i>Conclusions.<i/> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods\",\"authors\":\"S. Vilardi, S. Capozziello, M. Brescia\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/0004-6361/202451779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Context.<i/> This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features.<i>Aims.<i/> The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques.<i>Methods.<i/> Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three.<i>Results.<i/> Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection.<i>Conclusions.<i/> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451779\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。本研究使用标准Lambda冷暗物质(ΛCDM)模型作为先验,检查了Pantheon+SH0ES数据集,并应用机器学习来评估偏差。我们没有假设差异,而是测试了模型的拟合优度,并探索了数据是否允许其他宇宙学特征。研究的中心目标是评估ΛCDM模型与其他暗能量模型相比的稳健性,并调查是否存在可能提供新的宇宙学见解的偏差。本研究采用数据驱动的方法,使用传统的统计方法和机器学习技术。首先,我们使用传统的统计方法,如蒙特卡罗马尔可夫链(MCMC)和静态或动态嵌套抽样来评估六个暗能量模型,以推断宇宙参数。然后,我们采用了机器学习方法,开发了一个回归模型来计算每个超新星的距离模数,并将特征集扩展到74个统计特征。我们使用了四个模型的集合:多层感知器、k近邻、随机森林回归器和梯度增强。使用MCMC和嵌套抽样估计了四种情况下的宇宙学参数,并在三种情况下应用了特征选择技术(随机森林、Boruta和Shapley加性解释)。传统的统计分析证实ΛCDM模型是鲁棒的,能产生预期的参数值。其他模型表现出偏差,广义和修正的Chaplygin气体模型表现不佳。在机器学习分析中,特征选择技术,特别是Boruta,显著提高了模型的性能。特别是,最初被认为是弱的(广义的或修正的Chaplygin气体)模型在特征选择后表现出显著的改善。这项研究证明了数据驱动的宇宙学模型评估方法的有效性。ΛCDM模型仍然是稳健的,而机器学习技术,特别是特征选择,揭示了可能与新观测活动相关的替代模型的潜在改进,例如最近的暗能量光谱仪器调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods
Context. This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features.Aims. The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques.Methods. Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three.Results. Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection.Conclusions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信