[医生建议如何改善各层次之间的协调?结果在六个拉丁美洲国家]。

Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) Pub Date : 2024-01-01 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.15446/rsap.V26n1.106956
Aida Oliver-Anglés, Ingrid Vargas-Lorenzo, Julieta López-Vázquez, Isabella Chagas-Samico, Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Amparo S Mogollón-Pérez, Pamela Eguiguren-Bravo, Delia I Amarilla, Fernando Bertolotto, María Luisa Vázquez
{"title":"[医生建议如何改善各层次之间的协调?结果在六个拉丁美洲国家]。","authors":"Aida Oliver-Anglés, Ingrid Vargas-Lorenzo, Julieta López-Vázquez, Isabella Chagas-Samico, Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Amparo S Mogollón-Pérez, Pamela Eguiguren-Bravo, Delia I Amarilla, Fernando Bertolotto, María Luisa Vázquez","doi":"10.15446/rsap.V26n1.106956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the strategies for improving clinical coordination proposed by primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors from the public healthcare networks in six Latin American countries, and the changes between 2015 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies based on surveys (2015 and 2017) were developed with the application of the COORDENA questionnaire to a total of 4 311 primary and secondary care doctors from two public healthcare networks in each country. A descriptive analysis of the proposed suggestions was carried out stratified by country and year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all countries, the introduction or improvement of strategies and mechanisms that ease interaction and mutual knowledge between professionals from different care levels is noted, especially joint cross-level meetings, direct communication mechanisms and strategies to strengthen the use of the referral and back-referral form. Less frequently, other organisational strategies are suggested aimed at strengthening the primary care model, access to secondary care and the coordination of the network's management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results allow to generate recommendations for the improvement of clinical coordination in different health systems drawn from the suggestions made by doctors, a perspective that is seldom considered in the design and implementation of interventions in healthcare services. The need to promote strategies based on mutual adjustment in the development of public health policies is highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":520465,"journal":{"name":"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)","volume":"26 1","pages":"106956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[What do doctors suggest to improve coordination between levels? Results in six Latin American countries].\",\"authors\":\"Aida Oliver-Anglés, Ingrid Vargas-Lorenzo, Julieta López-Vázquez, Isabella Chagas-Samico, Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Amparo S Mogollón-Pérez, Pamela Eguiguren-Bravo, Delia I Amarilla, Fernando Bertolotto, María Luisa Vázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/rsap.V26n1.106956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the strategies for improving clinical coordination proposed by primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors from the public healthcare networks in six Latin American countries, and the changes between 2015 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies based on surveys (2015 and 2017) were developed with the application of the COORDENA questionnaire to a total of 4 311 primary and secondary care doctors from two public healthcare networks in each country. A descriptive analysis of the proposed suggestions was carried out stratified by country and year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all countries, the introduction or improvement of strategies and mechanisms that ease interaction and mutual knowledge between professionals from different care levels is noted, especially joint cross-level meetings, direct communication mechanisms and strategies to strengthen the use of the referral and back-referral form. Less frequently, other organisational strategies are suggested aimed at strengthening the primary care model, access to secondary care and the coordination of the network's management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results allow to generate recommendations for the improvement of clinical coordination in different health systems drawn from the suggestions made by doctors, a perspective that is seldom considered in the design and implementation of interventions in healthcare services. The need to promote strategies based on mutual adjustment in the development of public health policies is highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"106956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.V26n1.106956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.V26n1.106956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析拉丁美洲6个国家公共医疗网络初级保健(PC)和二级保健(SC)医生提出的改善临床协调的策略及其2015 - 2017年的变化。方法:基于调查(2015年和2017年)开展了两项横断面研究,采用COORDENA问卷调查了来自每个国家两个公共卫生网络的共4311名初级和二级保健医生。对拟议的建议进行了按国家和年份分层的描述性分析。结果:所有国家都注意到引入或完善了促进不同护理水平专业人员之间互动和相互了解的策略和机制,特别是联合跨级别会议,直接沟通机制和策略,以加强转诊和反转诊表的使用。不太常见的是,其他组织战略建议旨在加强初级保健模式,获得二级保健和网络管理的协调。结论:这些结果可以从医生的建议中为改善不同卫生系统的临床协调提出建议,这是在卫生保健服务干预措施的设计和实施中很少考虑的观点。强调需要在制定公共卫生政策时促进以相互调整为基础的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[What do doctors suggest to improve coordination between levels? Results in six Latin American countries].

Objective: To analyze the strategies for improving clinical coordination proposed by primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors from the public healthcare networks in six Latin American countries, and the changes between 2015 and 2017.

Methods: Two cross-sectional studies based on surveys (2015 and 2017) were developed with the application of the COORDENA questionnaire to a total of 4 311 primary and secondary care doctors from two public healthcare networks in each country. A descriptive analysis of the proposed suggestions was carried out stratified by country and year.

Results: In all countries, the introduction or improvement of strategies and mechanisms that ease interaction and mutual knowledge between professionals from different care levels is noted, especially joint cross-level meetings, direct communication mechanisms and strategies to strengthen the use of the referral and back-referral form. Less frequently, other organisational strategies are suggested aimed at strengthening the primary care model, access to secondary care and the coordination of the network's management.

Conclusions: The results allow to generate recommendations for the improvement of clinical coordination in different health systems drawn from the suggestions made by doctors, a perspective that is seldom considered in the design and implementation of interventions in healthcare services. The need to promote strategies based on mutual adjustment in the development of public health policies is highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信