美国COVID-19大流行前后对现实世界结肠直肠癌筛查依从性的纵向回顾性研究

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734
Harsh Gupta, Robyn Ann Husa, Staci J Wendt, Ann Vita, Claire Boone, Jessica B Weiss, Anton J Bilchik
{"title":"美国COVID-19大流行前后对现实世界结肠直肠癌筛查依从性的纵向回顾性研究","authors":"Harsh Gupta, Robyn Ann Husa, Staci J Wendt, Ann Vita, Claire Boone, Jessica B Weiss, Anton J Bilchik","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At-home stool tests are an increasingly popular practice for colorectal cancer screening, especially when access to healthcare facilities is challenging. However, there is limited information about whether stool tests provide sufficient coverage when patients must undergo repeat testing. This study evaluates repeat preventative stool tests over 2 year periods in a healthcare system with 51 hospitals and over 1000 clinics across seven western US states, before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conduct a real-world, observational, retrospective and longitudinal study based on electronic medical records. We measure the rate of repeat screening and mean delay in repeat screening among patients who receive an initial stool test. We estimate the changes in the likelihood of colorectal cancer screening using a Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 4 03 085 patients. The share of patients with an initial negative stool test who received a repeat screening ranged from 38% to 49% across different years. Among patients who received a repeat screening, there is a delay of 3 months on average. The volume of stool tests increased during the pandemic: the HR of screening after the onset of the pandemic to that before the pandemic was 1.18 (95% CI (1.15, 1.20), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that less than 50% of patients received a repeat stool test, creating gaps in their screening coverage. The increase in stool tests during the pandemic is partly due to a substitution away from colonoscopies, underscoring the increasing importance of stool tests in CRC screening. Programmes that aim to increase CRC screening uptake should focus on repeated testing after an initial screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal retrospective study of real-world adherence to colorectal cancer screening before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Gupta, Robyn Ann Husa, Staci J Wendt, Ann Vita, Claire Boone, Jessica B Weiss, Anton J Bilchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At-home stool tests are an increasingly popular practice for colorectal cancer screening, especially when access to healthcare facilities is challenging. However, there is limited information about whether stool tests provide sufficient coverage when patients must undergo repeat testing. This study evaluates repeat preventative stool tests over 2 year periods in a healthcare system with 51 hospitals and over 1000 clinics across seven western US states, before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conduct a real-world, observational, retrospective and longitudinal study based on electronic medical records. We measure the rate of repeat screening and mean delay in repeat screening among patients who receive an initial stool test. We estimate the changes in the likelihood of colorectal cancer screening using a Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 4 03 085 patients. The share of patients with an initial negative stool test who received a repeat screening ranged from 38% to 49% across different years. Among patients who received a repeat screening, there is a delay of 3 months on average. The volume of stool tests increased during the pandemic: the HR of screening after the onset of the pandemic to that before the pandemic was 1.18 (95% CI (1.15, 1.20), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that less than 50% of patients received a repeat stool test, creating gaps in their screening coverage. The increase in stool tests during the pandemic is partly due to a substitution away from colonoscopies, underscoring the increasing importance of stool tests in CRC screening. Programmes that aim to increase CRC screening uptake should focus on repeated testing after an initial screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e001734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:家庭粪便测试是一种越来越受欢迎的结肠直肠癌筛查方法,特别是当获得医疗保健设施具有挑战性时。然而,当患者必须进行重复检查时,粪便检查是否能提供足够的覆盖范围,这方面的信息有限。本研究评估了在美国西部7个州的51家医院和1000多家诊所的医疗保健系统中,在COVID-19大流行爆发前后2年的重复预防性粪便检测情况。方法:以电子病历为基础,进行真实世界、观察性、回顾性和纵向研究。我们测量了接受初次大便检查的患者的重复筛查率和重复筛查的平均延迟。我们使用Cox比例风险模型估计结直肠癌筛查可能性的变化。结果:我们的样本包括4 03 085例患者。在不同的年份,最初粪便检测呈阴性的患者接受重复筛查的比例从38%到49%不等。在接受重复筛查的患者中,平均延迟3个月。大流行期间粪便检测量增加:大流行发生后筛查的HR与大流行前的HR为1.18 (95% CI(1.15, 1.20))。结论:我们的研究结果显示,不到50%的患者接受了重复粪便检测,这造成了筛查覆盖率的差距。大流行期间粪便检查增加的部分原因是结肠镜检查的替代,这强调了粪便检查在结直肠癌筛查中的重要性日益增加。旨在提高CRC筛查接受度的规划应侧重于初始筛查后的重复检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal retrospective study of real-world adherence to colorectal cancer screening before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.

Introduction: At-home stool tests are an increasingly popular practice for colorectal cancer screening, especially when access to healthcare facilities is challenging. However, there is limited information about whether stool tests provide sufficient coverage when patients must undergo repeat testing. This study evaluates repeat preventative stool tests over 2 year periods in a healthcare system with 51 hospitals and over 1000 clinics across seven western US states, before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We conduct a real-world, observational, retrospective and longitudinal study based on electronic medical records. We measure the rate of repeat screening and mean delay in repeat screening among patients who receive an initial stool test. We estimate the changes in the likelihood of colorectal cancer screening using a Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: Our sample included 4 03 085 patients. The share of patients with an initial negative stool test who received a repeat screening ranged from 38% to 49% across different years. Among patients who received a repeat screening, there is a delay of 3 months on average. The volume of stool tests increased during the pandemic: the HR of screening after the onset of the pandemic to that before the pandemic was 1.18 (95% CI (1.15, 1.20), p<0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings show that less than 50% of patients received a repeat stool test, creating gaps in their screening coverage. The increase in stool tests during the pandemic is partly due to a substitution away from colonoscopies, underscoring the increasing importance of stool tests in CRC screening. Programmes that aim to increase CRC screening uptake should focus on repeated testing after an initial screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信