一种测量患者参与疼痛管理的调查工具的开发和早期验证。

Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Ariana Prinzbach, Olivia Sutton, Eileen M McDonald, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna, Jill A Marsteller, Anping Xie
{"title":"一种测量患者参与疼痛管理的调查工具的开发和早期验证。","authors":"Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Ariana Prinzbach, Olivia Sutton, Eileen M McDonald, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna, Jill A Marsteller, Anping Xie","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management.\",\"authors\":\"Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Ariana Prinzbach, Olivia Sutton, Eileen M McDonald, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna, Jill A Marsteller, Anping Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于定义和测量方法不一致,提高患者参与疼痛管理的努力常常受到阻碍。为了弥补这一不足,我们开发并试用了由 15 个项目组成的 "患者参与疼痛管理调查"。我们对 77 种调查工具进行了系统回顾,确定了患者参与度的 6 个关键结构,并对来自约翰霍普金斯大学个性化疼痛项目的 36 名患者和 3 名医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,为调查工具的开发提供了依据。最初的 33 个调查项目被细化为 15 个项目,并对 60 名个性化疼痛项目患者进行了可用性和重复测试可靠性评估。中位完成时间为 3.5 分钟,数据缺失率极低 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management.

Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信