经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗痉挛性食管疾病:临床结果和最佳方法。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tetsuya Tatsuta, Haruhiro Inoue, Yuto Shimamura, Miyuki Iwasaki, Kei Ushikubo, Kazuki Yamamoto, Yohei Nishikawa, Hidenori Tanaka, Ippei Tanaka, Satoshi Abiko, Mayo Tanabe, Kazuya Sumi, Manabu Onimaru, Boldbaatar Gantuya, Hirotake Sakuraba, Shinsaku Fukuda
{"title":"经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗痉挛性食管疾病:临床结果和最佳方法。","authors":"Tetsuya Tatsuta,&nbsp;Haruhiro Inoue,&nbsp;Yuto Shimamura,&nbsp;Miyuki Iwasaki,&nbsp;Kei Ushikubo,&nbsp;Kazuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yohei Nishikawa,&nbsp;Hidenori Tanaka,&nbsp;Ippei Tanaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Abiko,&nbsp;Mayo Tanabe,&nbsp;Kazuya Sumi,&nbsp;Manabu Onimaru,&nbsp;Boldbaatar Gantuya,&nbsp;Hirotake Sakuraba,&nbsp;Shinsaku Fukuda","doi":"10.1111/den.15008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2–3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2–3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 7","pages":"758-765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.15008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Tatsuta,&nbsp;Haruhiro Inoue,&nbsp;Yuto Shimamura,&nbsp;Miyuki Iwasaki,&nbsp;Kei Ushikubo,&nbsp;Kazuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yohei Nishikawa,&nbsp;Hidenori Tanaka,&nbsp;Ippei Tanaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Abiko,&nbsp;Mayo Tanabe,&nbsp;Kazuya Sumi,&nbsp;Manabu Onimaru,&nbsp;Boldbaatar Gantuya,&nbsp;Hirotake Sakuraba,&nbsp;Shinsaku Fukuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2–3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2–3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 7\",\"pages\":\"758-765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.15008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗痉挛性食管疾病(SED)的疗效和安全性,包括III型贲门失弛缓症、远端食管痉挛(DES)和风钻式食管(JE),由于其罕见,仍不确定。本研究旨在评估治疗SED的临床结果和最佳策略。方法:回顾性分析2014年3月至2023年12月期间因SED行POEM的患者。在所有病例中,肌切开术都是针对痉挛节段量身定制的。对于III型贲门失弛缓症,肌切开术延伸到贲门,而对于DES和乙脑,手术要么保留下食管括约肌(LES),要么包括胃肌切开术。评估的结果包括手术细节、技术和临床成功、不良事件和术后胃食管反流病(GERD)的发生率。临床成功定义为Eckardt评分≤3。结果:在2938例POEM手术中,106例(3.6%)为SED。该队列包括58例(54.8%)III型贲门失弛缓症患者,24例(22.6%)DES患者和24例(22.6%)乙脑患者。技术成功率100%,2-3个月临床成功率98.1%,1年临床成功率92.6%。2-3个月发生糜烂性食管炎的占27.7%,1年发生糜烂性食管炎的占16.1%。保留les的POEM治疗DES和乙脑的疗效与POEM联合胃肌切开术相当,且有降低GERD发生率的趋势。结论:经口内窥镜下肌切开术是治疗各种类型SED的有效方法。保留les的POEM是治疗DES和乙脑的可行策略,具有相当的疗效,同时潜在地降低了GERD风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches

Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches

Objectives

The efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.

Results

Among 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2–3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2–3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.

Conclusion

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信