重大创伤后重返工作岗位:系统回顾。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Anne Neubert, Sebastian Hempe, Dan Bieler, Denise Schulz, Carina Jaekel, Michael Bernhard, Joachim Windolf
{"title":"重大创伤后重返工作岗位:系统回顾。","authors":"Anne Neubert, Sebastian Hempe, Dan Bieler, Denise Schulz, Carina Jaekel, Michael Bernhard, Joachim Windolf","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01351-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals suffering from major trauma and survive, often face diverse physical, psychological, and cognitive restrictions which can influence the (health-related) quality of life and the ability to work. Even though, return to work is not necessarily related to the health status of the individual, but it is viewed as a sign of successful reintegration and is a vital parameter of recovery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to systematically review factors influencing return to work (RTW) after suffering from major trauma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A search on seven databases was performed. The identified publications were selected according to the inclusion criteria: adults (≥ 16 years) who suffered a major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) in studies that explored factors associated with RTW. Risk of bias was assessed with the 'Quality in Prognostic studies' tool. Due to reporting quality of the included studies no meta-analysis was performed. Data were clustered, qualitatively analyzed and factors are assessed based on the strength of evidence. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022357649).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 studies with 6907 participants (mean age 45 years, 75% males, mean ISS 28) were included. The included studies had low to moderate risk of bias for most domains, the domain 'study confounding' had most often a high risk of bias. Many factors were identified including physical (e.g., injury locations), personal (e.g., age) but also environmental factors (e.g., preinjury income). Only four factors (age, educational level, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and Length of stay (LOS) hospital) are based on moderate or strong evidence. The identified factors reflect the complex interactions within the process of regaining the ability to work after major trauma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review was able to map the evidence surrounding factors affecting RTW after major trauma. Most of the identified factors are currently only based on limited evidence. According to these factors, younger patients with a higher educational level who have a shorter LOS in hospital and a shorter ICU stay might have better chances of RTW.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Neubert, Sebastian Hempe, Dan Bieler, Denise Schulz, Carina Jaekel, Michael Bernhard, Joachim Windolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-025-01351-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals suffering from major trauma and survive, often face diverse physical, psychological, and cognitive restrictions which can influence the (health-related) quality of life and the ability to work. Even though, return to work is not necessarily related to the health status of the individual, but it is viewed as a sign of successful reintegration and is a vital parameter of recovery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to systematically review factors influencing return to work (RTW) after suffering from major trauma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A search on seven databases was performed. The identified publications were selected according to the inclusion criteria: adults (≥ 16 years) who suffered a major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) in studies that explored factors associated with RTW. Risk of bias was assessed with the 'Quality in Prognostic studies' tool. Due to reporting quality of the included studies no meta-analysis was performed. Data were clustered, qualitatively analyzed and factors are assessed based on the strength of evidence. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022357649).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 studies with 6907 participants (mean age 45 years, 75% males, mean ISS 28) were included. The included studies had low to moderate risk of bias for most domains, the domain 'study confounding' had most often a high risk of bias. Many factors were identified including physical (e.g., injury locations), personal (e.g., age) but also environmental factors (e.g., preinjury income). Only four factors (age, educational level, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and Length of stay (LOS) hospital) are based on moderate or strong evidence. The identified factors reflect the complex interactions within the process of regaining the ability to work after major trauma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review was able to map the evidence surrounding factors affecting RTW after major trauma. Most of the identified factors are currently only based on limited evidence. According to these factors, younger patients with a higher educational level who have a shorter LOS in hospital and a shorter ICU stay might have better chances of RTW.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01351-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01351-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:遭受重大创伤并存活下来的个体往往面临各种各样的身体、心理和认知限制,这些限制可能影响(与健康有关的)生活质量和工作能力。尽管重返工作岗位不一定与个人的健康状况有关,但它被视为成功重返社会的标志,是康复的一个重要参数。目的:系统回顾影响重大创伤患者重返工作岗位的因素。材料和方法:对7个数据库进行了检索。根据纳入标准选择已确定的出版物:在探讨RTW相关因素的研究中遭受重大创伤(损伤严重程度评分≥16)的成年人(≥16岁)。使用“预后研究质量”工具评估偏倚风险。由于纳入研究的报告质量问题,未进行meta分析。对数据进行聚类,定性分析,并根据证据的强度对因素进行评估。(普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022357649)。结果:纳入12项研究,6907名参与者(平均年龄45岁,男性75%,平均ISS 28)。纳入的研究在大多数领域具有低至中等偏倚风险,而在“研究混杂”领域,偏倚风险通常较高。确定了许多因素,包括身体因素(例如,受伤位置),个人因素(例如,年龄)以及环境因素(例如,受伤前收入)。只有四个因素(年龄、教育水平、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和住院时间(LOS))基于中等或强有力的证据。确定的因素反映了重大创伤后恢复工作能力过程中的复杂相互作用。讨论:本系统综述能够绘制出影响重大创伤后RTW的相关因素的证据。大多数已确定的因素目前仅基于有限的证据。综上所述,较年轻、受教育程度较高、住院时间较短、ICU住院时间较短的患者发生RTW的可能性较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review.

Introduction: Individuals suffering from major trauma and survive, often face diverse physical, psychological, and cognitive restrictions which can influence the (health-related) quality of life and the ability to work. Even though, return to work is not necessarily related to the health status of the individual, but it is viewed as a sign of successful reintegration and is a vital parameter of recovery.

Objective: The aim was to systematically review factors influencing return to work (RTW) after suffering from major trauma.

Material and methods: A search on seven databases was performed. The identified publications were selected according to the inclusion criteria: adults (≥ 16 years) who suffered a major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) in studies that explored factors associated with RTW. Risk of bias was assessed with the 'Quality in Prognostic studies' tool. Due to reporting quality of the included studies no meta-analysis was performed. Data were clustered, qualitatively analyzed and factors are assessed based on the strength of evidence. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022357649).

Results: 12 studies with 6907 participants (mean age 45 years, 75% males, mean ISS 28) were included. The included studies had low to moderate risk of bias for most domains, the domain 'study confounding' had most often a high risk of bias. Many factors were identified including physical (e.g., injury locations), personal (e.g., age) but also environmental factors (e.g., preinjury income). Only four factors (age, educational level, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and Length of stay (LOS) hospital) are based on moderate or strong evidence. The identified factors reflect the complex interactions within the process of regaining the ability to work after major trauma.

Discussion: This systematic review was able to map the evidence surrounding factors affecting RTW after major trauma. Most of the identified factors are currently only based on limited evidence. According to these factors, younger patients with a higher educational level who have a shorter LOS in hospital and a shorter ICU stay might have better chances of RTW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信