开发和验证一个指数来衡量和量化宠物相关的障碍,以获得和利用医疗保健。

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Anthrozoos Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1080/08927936.2024.2430820
Jennifer W Applebaum, Camie A Tomlinson, Shelby E McDonald, Kaylinn Escobar, Maya Widmeyer, Humberto E Fabelo, Robert L Cook
{"title":"开发和验证一个指数来衡量和量化宠物相关的障碍,以获得和利用医疗保健。","authors":"Jennifer W Applebaum, Camie A Tomlinson, Shelby E McDonald, Kaylinn Escobar, Maya Widmeyer, Humberto E Fabelo, Robert L Cook","doi":"10.1080/08927936.2024.2430820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Issues such as inadequate transportation, language barriers, being uninsured, and living in geographic locations with poor service availability can prevent people from accessing necessary healthcare. In addition, approximately 60% of the US population has pets, which can also create barriers to healthcare that are related to pet caregiving responsibilities and concerns about pet welfare, particularly when they have inadequate social and economic resources. This study introduces a new index to measure pet-related barriers to healthcare: the Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Index (PRBH). We first describe the development of the index based on previous literature and expert consultation. Next, we evaluate the psychometric properties of the index in a sample of 219 pet-owning people with HIV in Florida. We use three validation approaches: 1) confirmatory factor analysis to test the hypothesized two-factor structure of the PRBH measure and to compare the fit of this model with alternative models, 2) assessment of construct validity for the PRBH factors with validated measures of commitment to pets, comfort derived from pets, and social support from people, and 3) latent class analysis to identify underlying patterns of endorsement of items. Additionally, we assessed differences in index scores by sociodemographic characteristics. Our results indicate that 1) a modified 2-factor model that split items based on item phrasing fit the data best: one factor measured previously experienced barriers, while the other factor measured anticipated future barriers. This factor structure was further supported by the results of the latent class analysis; 2) Poorer social support from people was associated with higher endorsement of both factors; and 3) Twenty percent of the participants were characterized by high endorsement of the index items. The use of the PRBH in research and clinical settings is an important step in standardizing the quantification of this construct, identifying populations most at risk for pet-related barriers to their healthcare and moving toward systematized support services for those groups and their animal companions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50748,"journal":{"name":"Anthrozoos","volume":"38 1","pages":"109-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of an Index to Measure and Quantify Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Access and Utilization.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer W Applebaum, Camie A Tomlinson, Shelby E McDonald, Kaylinn Escobar, Maya Widmeyer, Humberto E Fabelo, Robert L Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08927936.2024.2430820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Issues such as inadequate transportation, language barriers, being uninsured, and living in geographic locations with poor service availability can prevent people from accessing necessary healthcare. In addition, approximately 60% of the US population has pets, which can also create barriers to healthcare that are related to pet caregiving responsibilities and concerns about pet welfare, particularly when they have inadequate social and economic resources. This study introduces a new index to measure pet-related barriers to healthcare: the Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Index (PRBH). We first describe the development of the index based on previous literature and expert consultation. Next, we evaluate the psychometric properties of the index in a sample of 219 pet-owning people with HIV in Florida. We use three validation approaches: 1) confirmatory factor analysis to test the hypothesized two-factor structure of the PRBH measure and to compare the fit of this model with alternative models, 2) assessment of construct validity for the PRBH factors with validated measures of commitment to pets, comfort derived from pets, and social support from people, and 3) latent class analysis to identify underlying patterns of endorsement of items. Additionally, we assessed differences in index scores by sociodemographic characteristics. Our results indicate that 1) a modified 2-factor model that split items based on item phrasing fit the data best: one factor measured previously experienced barriers, while the other factor measured anticipated future barriers. This factor structure was further supported by the results of the latent class analysis; 2) Poorer social support from people was associated with higher endorsement of both factors; and 3) Twenty percent of the participants were characterized by high endorsement of the index items. The use of the PRBH in research and clinical settings is an important step in standardizing the quantification of this construct, identifying populations most at risk for pet-related barriers to their healthcare and moving toward systematized support services for those groups and their animal companions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthrozoos\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"109-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthrozoos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2430820\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthrozoos","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2430820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通不便、语言障碍、没有保险以及生活在服务匮乏的地理位置等问题都可能阻碍人们获得必要的医疗保健。此外,大约60%的美国人口拥有宠物,这也会给与宠物护理责任和宠物福利相关的医疗保健造成障碍,特别是当他们没有足够的社会和经济资源时。本研究引入了一个新的指标来衡量与宠物相关的保健障碍:宠物相关的保健障碍指数(PRBH)。我们首先在前人文献和专家咨询的基础上描述了该指数的发展。接下来,我们在佛罗里达州219名拥有宠物的艾滋病毒感染者样本中评估该指数的心理测量特性。我们使用了三种验证方法:1)验证性因子分析来检验PRBH测量的假设双因素结构,并比较该模型与其他模型的拟合性;2)用对宠物的承诺、宠物带来的舒适和人的社会支持的验证措施来评估PRBH因素的结构效度;3)潜在类别分析来识别项目认可的潜在模式。此外,我们根据社会人口特征评估了指数得分的差异。研究结果表明:1)基于项目措辞的修正双因素模型最适合数据,其中一个因素测量先前经历的障碍,而另一个因素测量预期的未来障碍。潜在类别分析结果进一步支持了这一因素结构;2)社会支持越差,对两种因素的认同程度越高;3) 20%的被调查者对指标项目的认可度较高。在研究和临床环境中使用PRBH是标准化量化这一结构的重要一步,可以识别出与宠物相关的医疗障碍风险最大的人群,并为这些群体及其动物伴侣提供系统化的支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of an Index to Measure and Quantify Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Access and Utilization.

Issues such as inadequate transportation, language barriers, being uninsured, and living in geographic locations with poor service availability can prevent people from accessing necessary healthcare. In addition, approximately 60% of the US population has pets, which can also create barriers to healthcare that are related to pet caregiving responsibilities and concerns about pet welfare, particularly when they have inadequate social and economic resources. This study introduces a new index to measure pet-related barriers to healthcare: the Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Index (PRBH). We first describe the development of the index based on previous literature and expert consultation. Next, we evaluate the psychometric properties of the index in a sample of 219 pet-owning people with HIV in Florida. We use three validation approaches: 1) confirmatory factor analysis to test the hypothesized two-factor structure of the PRBH measure and to compare the fit of this model with alternative models, 2) assessment of construct validity for the PRBH factors with validated measures of commitment to pets, comfort derived from pets, and social support from people, and 3) latent class analysis to identify underlying patterns of endorsement of items. Additionally, we assessed differences in index scores by sociodemographic characteristics. Our results indicate that 1) a modified 2-factor model that split items based on item phrasing fit the data best: one factor measured previously experienced barriers, while the other factor measured anticipated future barriers. This factor structure was further supported by the results of the latent class analysis; 2) Poorer social support from people was associated with higher endorsement of both factors; and 3) Twenty percent of the participants were characterized by high endorsement of the index items. The use of the PRBH in research and clinical settings is an important step in standardizing the quantification of this construct, identifying populations most at risk for pet-related barriers to their healthcare and moving toward systematized support services for those groups and their animal companions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthrozoos
Anthrozoos 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: A vital forum for academic dialogue on human-animal relations, Anthrozoös is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that has enjoyed a distinguished history as a pioneer in the field since its launch in 1987. The key premise of Anthrozoös is to address the characteristics and consequences of interactions and relationships between people and non-human animals across areas as varied as anthropology, ethology, medicine, psychology, veterinary medicine and zoology. Articles therefore cover the full range of human–animal relations, from their treatment in the arts and humanities, through to behavioral, biological, social and health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信