抄袭态度量表的验证及其构念间的相互关系。

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Md Atikuzzaman, S M Zabed Ahmed
{"title":"抄袭态度量表的验证及其构念间的相互关系。","authors":"Md Atikuzzaman, S M Zabed Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/15562646251327541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study validates the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) scale and investigates the interrelationships among its three constructs: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms regarding plagiarism. Data were collected from 720 students across two universities in Bangladesh. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from one university (<i>n </i>= 412), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from another university (<i>n </i>= 308). The EFA extracted 20 items from the original 29-item ATP scale, while the CFA retained a 17-item version. Both analyses confirmed the ATP's original three-factor structure. Pearson's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed using the total sample (<i>n </i>= 720) to examine the relationships among the constructs. The results of Pearson's correlation showed significant positive correlations among the ATP constructs. SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms significantly influenced positive attitudes, and positive attitudes significantly mediated the relationship between subjective norms and negative attitudes toward plagiarism.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"15562646251327541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism Scale and Examining the Interrelationships among its Constructs.\",\"authors\":\"Md Atikuzzaman, S M Zabed Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15562646251327541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study validates the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) scale and investigates the interrelationships among its three constructs: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms regarding plagiarism. Data were collected from 720 students across two universities in Bangladesh. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from one university (<i>n </i>= 412), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from another university (<i>n </i>= 308). The EFA extracted 20 items from the original 29-item ATP scale, while the CFA retained a 17-item version. Both analyses confirmed the ATP's original three-factor structure. Pearson's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed using the total sample (<i>n </i>= 720) to examine the relationships among the constructs. The results of Pearson's correlation showed significant positive correlations among the ATP constructs. SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms significantly influenced positive attitudes, and positive attitudes significantly mediated the relationship between subjective norms and negative attitudes toward plagiarism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15562646251327541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251327541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251327541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对抄袭态度(ATP)量表进行了验证,并探讨了其三个构式:对抄袭的积极态度、消极态度和主观规范之间的相互关系。数据收集自孟加拉国两所大学的720名学生。对一所大学(n = 412)的数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA),然后对另一所大学(n = 308)的数据进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。EFA从原来的29项ATP量表中提取了20项,而CFA保留了17项的版本。两种分析都证实了ATP原来的三因子结构。使用总样本(n = 720)进行Pearson相关和结构方程模型(SEM)来检验结构之间的关系。Pearson相关分析结果显示ATP结构之间存在显著正相关。SEM分析发现,主观规范显著影响学生对抄袭行为的积极态度,积极态度显著中介主观规范与消极态度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism Scale and Examining the Interrelationships among its Constructs.

This study validates the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) scale and investigates the interrelationships among its three constructs: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms regarding plagiarism. Data were collected from 720 students across two universities in Bangladesh. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from one university (n = 412), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from another university (n = 308). The EFA extracted 20 items from the original 29-item ATP scale, while the CFA retained a 17-item version. Both analyses confirmed the ATP's original three-factor structure. Pearson's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed using the total sample (n = 720) to examine the relationships among the constructs. The results of Pearson's correlation showed significant positive correlations among the ATP constructs. SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms significantly influenced positive attitudes, and positive attitudes significantly mediated the relationship between subjective norms and negative attitudes toward plagiarism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) is the only journal in the field of human research ethics dedicated exclusively to empirical research. Empirical knowledge translates ethical principles into procedures appropriate to specific cultures, contexts, and research topics. The journal''s distinguished editorial and advisory board brings a range of expertise and international perspective to provide high-quality double-blind peer-reviewed original articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信