个人听力设备用户cemp的最佳频率。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Teja Deepak Dessai, Annapurna G Parameswaran, Rashmi J Bhat, Kaushlendra Kumar
{"title":"个人听力设备用户cemp的最佳频率。","authors":"Teja Deepak Dessai, Annapurna G Parameswaran, Rashmi J Bhat, Kaushlendra Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12070-025-05356-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of PLDs is linked to negative effects on the inner ear. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the optimal frequency to test cVEMP in individuals using PLDs. A cross sectional comparative study was conducted on 128 individuals who were between the ages of 15-24 years with PLD exposure were divided into two groups: control group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume less than 60% of the PLD) and an experimental group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume greater than 60% for more than 1 year). Participants underwent MIRE and cVEMP testing using tone bursts of three different frequencies (500, 750, and 1000 Hz). Further, Latency, Peak-Peak Amplitude and Asymmetric Ratio of cVEMP responses were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed using statistical tests such as Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Walli's test. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference across frequencies in both groups. However, experimental group used higher output dBA values (75.4 ± 7.77 dBA). Similarly, reduced amplitudes, increased latencies and Asymmetric Ratio values were observed in experimental group suggesting a negative influence of PLDs on the vestibular system. A 500 Hz tone burst stimuli is observed to be the optimal frequency for cVEMP. However, higher values for all compared parameters of cVEMP in experimental group may depict the negative influence of PLD on the vestibular system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"77 3","pages":"1429-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Frequency for cVEMP in Users of Personal Listening Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Teja Deepak Dessai, Annapurna G Parameswaran, Rashmi J Bhat, Kaushlendra Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12070-025-05356-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of PLDs is linked to negative effects on the inner ear. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the optimal frequency to test cVEMP in individuals using PLDs. A cross sectional comparative study was conducted on 128 individuals who were between the ages of 15-24 years with PLD exposure were divided into two groups: control group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume less than 60% of the PLD) and an experimental group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume greater than 60% for more than 1 year). Participants underwent MIRE and cVEMP testing using tone bursts of three different frequencies (500, 750, and 1000 Hz). Further, Latency, Peak-Peak Amplitude and Asymmetric Ratio of cVEMP responses were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed using statistical tests such as Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Walli's test. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference across frequencies in both groups. However, experimental group used higher output dBA values (75.4 ± 7.77 dBA). Similarly, reduced amplitudes, increased latencies and Asymmetric Ratio values were observed in experimental group suggesting a negative influence of PLDs on the vestibular system. A 500 Hz tone burst stimuli is observed to be the optimal frequency for cVEMP. However, higher values for all compared parameters of cVEMP in experimental group may depict the negative influence of PLD on the vestibular system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"1429-1438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05356-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05356-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用pld会对内耳产生负面影响。因此,本研究的目的是确定在使用pld的个体中测试cemp的最佳频率。对128名年龄在15-24岁之间的PLD暴露者进行了横断面比较研究,将其分为两组:对照组(PLD暴露史每天至少1小时,体积小于PLD的60%)和实验组(PLD暴露史每天至少1小时,体积大于60%,持续1年以上)。参与者使用三种不同频率(500、750和1000 Hz)的音调爆发进行了MIRE和cemp测试。进一步比较两组cemp反应的潜伏期、峰峰振幅和非对称比。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Walli检验等统计检验对数据进行分析。研究结果显示,两组之间的频率没有统计学上的显著差异。而实验组使用更高的输出dBA值(75.4±7.77 dBA)。同样,在实验组中观察到振幅降低,潜伏期增加和不对称比率值,这表明PLDs对前庭系统有负面影响。观察到500 Hz的音调爆发刺激是cemp的最佳频率。然而,实验组的cemp比较参数均较高,可能反映了PLD对前庭系统的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Frequency for cVEMP in Users of Personal Listening Devices.

The use of PLDs is linked to negative effects on the inner ear. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the optimal frequency to test cVEMP in individuals using PLDs. A cross sectional comparative study was conducted on 128 individuals who were between the ages of 15-24 years with PLD exposure were divided into two groups: control group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume less than 60% of the PLD) and an experimental group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume greater than 60% for more than 1 year). Participants underwent MIRE and cVEMP testing using tone bursts of three different frequencies (500, 750, and 1000 Hz). Further, Latency, Peak-Peak Amplitude and Asymmetric Ratio of cVEMP responses were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed using statistical tests such as Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Walli's test. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference across frequencies in both groups. However, experimental group used higher output dBA values (75.4 ± 7.77 dBA). Similarly, reduced amplitudes, increased latencies and Asymmetric Ratio values were observed in experimental group suggesting a negative influence of PLDs on the vestibular system. A 500 Hz tone burst stimuli is observed to be the optimal frequency for cVEMP. However, higher values for all compared parameters of cVEMP in experimental group may depict the negative influence of PLD on the vestibular system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress. IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc. The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world. The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members. Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信