流线试点——人工智能辅助记录缩短时间和提高效率以改善笔记体验的研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Roheet Kakaday, Elizabeth Zoe Herrera, Olivia Coskey, Andrew W Hertel, Paulina Kaiser
{"title":"流线试点——人工智能辅助记录缩短时间和提高效率以改善笔记体验的研究。","authors":"Roheet Kakaday, Elizabeth Zoe Herrera, Olivia Coskey, Andrew W Hertel, Paulina Kaiser","doi":"10.1055/a-2559-5791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of an ambient listening AI tool, DAX CoPilot (DAX), on clinical documentation efficiency among primary care providers in a community-based setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial among volunteer clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and urgent care), who were asked to use DAX with a standardized note template (N = 25) or to continue with traditional documentation methods (N = 20) over a three-month intervention period. We evaluated documentation efficiency with both standard and custom Epic metrics to evaluate impact on all visit types as well as specifically problem-focused visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because of heterogeneity in DAX usage, we created post-hoc categories of Low (< 45% of all visits, N=12), Moderate (45-69.9% of all visits, N=6) and High Frequency (≥ 70% of all visits, N=7) DAX users. We observed the largest differences among High Frequency DAX users. For problem-focused visits with clinicians in this group, a median of 50% of note characters were written by DAX, and we observed a 1.4-minute decrease in time spent on notes per visit (p-value: 0.38) and a 35% decrease in the median number of characters per note (p-value: 0.38) from baseline to the end of the study period. The control group metrics were largely uncharged throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that DAX can improve documentation efficiency, particularly among clinicians that use it frequently. Healthcare systems might benefit by using AL-AI tools like DAX but should consider implementation scope and note template features. Future investigations are needed to further explore these trends and their additional implications for outcomes such as burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The STREAMLINE Pilot - Study on Time Reduction and Efficiency in AI-Mediated Logging for Improved Note-Taking Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Roheet Kakaday, Elizabeth Zoe Herrera, Olivia Coskey, Andrew W Hertel, Paulina Kaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2559-5791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of an ambient listening AI tool, DAX CoPilot (DAX), on clinical documentation efficiency among primary care providers in a community-based setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial among volunteer clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and urgent care), who were asked to use DAX with a standardized note template (N = 25) or to continue with traditional documentation methods (N = 20) over a three-month intervention period. We evaluated documentation efficiency with both standard and custom Epic metrics to evaluate impact on all visit types as well as specifically problem-focused visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because of heterogeneity in DAX usage, we created post-hoc categories of Low (< 45% of all visits, N=12), Moderate (45-69.9% of all visits, N=6) and High Frequency (≥ 70% of all visits, N=7) DAX users. We observed the largest differences among High Frequency DAX users. For problem-focused visits with clinicians in this group, a median of 50% of note characters were written by DAX, and we observed a 1.4-minute decrease in time spent on notes per visit (p-value: 0.38) and a 35% decrease in the median number of characters per note (p-value: 0.38) from baseline to the end of the study period. The control group metrics were largely uncharged throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that DAX can improve documentation efficiency, particularly among clinicians that use it frequently. Healthcare systems might benefit by using AL-AI tools like DAX but should consider implementation scope and note template features. Future investigations are needed to further explore these trends and their additional implications for outcomes such as burnout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2559-5791\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2559-5791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本试点研究旨在评估环境聆听人工智能工具DAX CoPilot (DAX)对社区环境中初级保健提供者临床记录效率的影响。方法:我们在志愿临床医生(医生、执业护士和家庭医学、内科、儿科和急诊的医师助理)中进行了一项随机对照试验,他们被要求在三个月的干预期内使用带有标准化笔记模板的DAX (N = 25)或继续使用传统的记录方法(N = 20)。我们使用标准和自定义Epic指标评估文档效率,以评估对所有访问类型的影响,以及专门针对问题的访问。结果:由于DAX使用的异质性,我们创建了低(占所有访问的45%,N=12),中等(占所有访问的45-69.9%,N=6)和高频率(占所有访问的70%,N=7) DAX用户的特殊类别。我们观察到高频DAX用户之间的最大差异。对于本组临床医生以问题为中心的访问,DAX撰写笔记字符的中位数为50%,我们观察到从基线到研究期结束,每次访问记录的时间减少了1.4分钟(p值:0.38),每个笔记的中位数字符减少了35% (p值:0.38)。在整个研究过程中,对照组的指标基本没有变化。结论:我们的研究结果表明,DAX可以提高记录效率,特别是在经常使用它的临床医生中。医疗保健系统可能会受益于使用DAX等AL-AI工具,但应该考虑实现范围和笔记模板功能。未来的调查需要进一步探索这些趋势及其对倦怠等结果的额外影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The STREAMLINE Pilot - Study on Time Reduction and Efficiency in AI-Mediated Logging for Improved Note-Taking Experience.

Objectives: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of an ambient listening AI tool, DAX CoPilot (DAX), on clinical documentation efficiency among primary care providers in a community-based setting.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial among volunteer clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and urgent care), who were asked to use DAX with a standardized note template (N = 25) or to continue with traditional documentation methods (N = 20) over a three-month intervention period. We evaluated documentation efficiency with both standard and custom Epic metrics to evaluate impact on all visit types as well as specifically problem-focused visits.

Results: Because of heterogeneity in DAX usage, we created post-hoc categories of Low (< 45% of all visits, N=12), Moderate (45-69.9% of all visits, N=6) and High Frequency (≥ 70% of all visits, N=7) DAX users. We observed the largest differences among High Frequency DAX users. For problem-focused visits with clinicians in this group, a median of 50% of note characters were written by DAX, and we observed a 1.4-minute decrease in time spent on notes per visit (p-value: 0.38) and a 35% decrease in the median number of characters per note (p-value: 0.38) from baseline to the end of the study period. The control group metrics were largely uncharged throughout the study.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DAX can improve documentation efficiency, particularly among clinicians that use it frequently. Healthcare systems might benefit by using AL-AI tools like DAX but should consider implementation scope and note template features. Future investigations are needed to further explore these trends and their additional implications for outcomes such as burnout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信