夜间择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与一年死亡率增加无关。

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Andreas Koköfer, Christian Dinges, Crispiana Cozowicz, Bernhard Wernly, Niklas Rodemund
{"title":"夜间择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与一年死亡率增加无关。","authors":"Andreas Koköfer, Christian Dinges, Crispiana Cozowicz, Bernhard Wernly, Niklas Rodemund","doi":"10.1186/s13037-025-00430-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are increasingly scheduled during nighttime or after-hours. This poses unique challenges, such as reduced staffing, disrupted circadian rhythms, and increased fatigue, which may potentially affect outcomes. Despite growing evidence on the impact of daytime on cardiac surgery outcome, results remain inconclusive. The current study aims to investigate a potential association between surgery timing (daytime: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM vs. nighttime: 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM) and long-term survival in patients undergoing elective CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-institution cohort study at the University Clinic Salzburg, Austria, we analyzed elective CABG surgeries performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The primary hypothesis was that nighttime elective CABG surgeries have worse long-term survival. Among 2,179 cardiac surgical procedures, 723 elective CABG surgeries were identified and analyzed. Long-term survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, while secondary outcomes, including 30-day and one-year mortality rates, were evaluated through multiple linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-year mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 19) for the observation period. Of the 723 patients, 646 (89.35%) underwent daytime surgery, and 77 (10.65%) had nighttime surgery. The median EuroScore II was 1.50 [1.00, 2.60] for daytime surgeries and 1.70 [1.10, 3.10] for nighttime surgeries (p = 0.111). There was no association between nighttime surgery and long-term mortality (aHR: 1.624, 95% CI: 0.589 to 3.662, p = 0.3179). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that nighttime surgeries were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (aOR: 1.089, 95% CI: 0.208 to 3.711, p = 0.905). No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis found no significant association between nocturnal elective CABG operations and increased long-term or one-year mortality. This study did not aim to evaluate the economics of nocturnal surgeries at the investigated institution. To confirm our results that there is no increased morbidity and mortality associated with nocturnal CABG operations, and to understand the economic impact of nocturnal surgeries, prospective randomized studies would be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nocturnal elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is not associated with increased one-year mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Koköfer, Christian Dinges, Crispiana Cozowicz, Bernhard Wernly, Niklas Rodemund\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13037-025-00430-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are increasingly scheduled during nighttime or after-hours. This poses unique challenges, such as reduced staffing, disrupted circadian rhythms, and increased fatigue, which may potentially affect outcomes. Despite growing evidence on the impact of daytime on cardiac surgery outcome, results remain inconclusive. The current study aims to investigate a potential association between surgery timing (daytime: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM vs. nighttime: 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM) and long-term survival in patients undergoing elective CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-institution cohort study at the University Clinic Salzburg, Austria, we analyzed elective CABG surgeries performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The primary hypothesis was that nighttime elective CABG surgeries have worse long-term survival. Among 2,179 cardiac surgical procedures, 723 elective CABG surgeries were identified and analyzed. Long-term survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, while secondary outcomes, including 30-day and one-year mortality rates, were evaluated through multiple linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-year mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 19) for the observation period. Of the 723 patients, 646 (89.35%) underwent daytime surgery, and 77 (10.65%) had nighttime surgery. The median EuroScore II was 1.50 [1.00, 2.60] for daytime surgeries and 1.70 [1.10, 3.10] for nighttime surgeries (p = 0.111). There was no association between nighttime surgery and long-term mortality (aHR: 1.624, 95% CI: 0.589 to 3.662, p = 0.3179). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that nighttime surgeries were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (aOR: 1.089, 95% CI: 0.208 to 3.711, p = 0.905). No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis found no significant association between nocturnal elective CABG operations and increased long-term or one-year mortality. This study did not aim to evaluate the economics of nocturnal surgeries at the investigated institution. To confirm our results that there is no increased morbidity and mortality associated with nocturnal CABG operations, and to understand the economic impact of nocturnal surgeries, prospective randomized studies would be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00430-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00430-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择性冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术越来越多地安排在夜间或下班时间。这带来了独特的挑战,如人员减少、昼夜节律紊乱、疲劳加剧,这些都可能影响结果。尽管越来越多的证据表明白天对心脏手术结果的影响,结果仍然没有定论。目前的研究旨在调查择期CABG患者手术时间(白天:7:00 AM - 7:00 PM vs.夜间:7:00 PM - 7:00 AM)与长期生存之间的潜在关联。方法:在奥地利萨尔茨堡大学诊所进行的这项回顾性单机构队列研究中,我们分析了2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间进行的选择性冠脉搭桥手术。主要假设是夜间选择性冠脉搭桥手术的长期生存率较差。在2179例心脏外科手术中,确定并分析了723例选择性冠脉搭桥手术。采用Cox比例风险模型评估长期生存率,通过多元线性回归分析评估次要结局,包括30天和1年死亡率。结果:观察期内1年死亡率为2.6% (n = 19)。723例患者中,646例(89.35%)日间手术,77例(10.65%)夜间手术。日间手术的EuroScore II中位数为1.50[1.00,2.60],夜间手术的EuroScore II中位数为1.70 [1.10,3.10](p = 0.111)。夜间手术与长期死亡率之间没有关联(aHR: 1.624, 95% CI: 0.589 ~ 3.662, p = 0.3179)。多变量logistic回归分析证实夜间手术与一年死亡率增加无显著相关(aOR: 1.089, 95% CI: 0.208 ~ 3.711, p = 0.905)。两组在30天内均未发生死亡。结论:本分析发现夜间择期冠脉搭桥手术与长期或一年死亡率增加无显著关联。本研究的目的不是评估夜间手术在被调查机构的经济性。为了证实我们的结果,夜间冠脉搭桥手术没有增加发病率和死亡率,并了解夜间手术的经济影响,前瞻性随机研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nocturnal elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is not associated with increased one-year mortality.

Background: Elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are increasingly scheduled during nighttime or after-hours. This poses unique challenges, such as reduced staffing, disrupted circadian rhythms, and increased fatigue, which may potentially affect outcomes. Despite growing evidence on the impact of daytime on cardiac surgery outcome, results remain inconclusive. The current study aims to investigate a potential association between surgery timing (daytime: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM vs. nighttime: 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM) and long-term survival in patients undergoing elective CABG.

Methods: In this retrospective single-institution cohort study at the University Clinic Salzburg, Austria, we analyzed elective CABG surgeries performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The primary hypothesis was that nighttime elective CABG surgeries have worse long-term survival. Among 2,179 cardiac surgical procedures, 723 elective CABG surgeries were identified and analyzed. Long-term survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, while secondary outcomes, including 30-day and one-year mortality rates, were evaluated through multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: The one-year mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 19) for the observation period. Of the 723 patients, 646 (89.35%) underwent daytime surgery, and 77 (10.65%) had nighttime surgery. The median EuroScore II was 1.50 [1.00, 2.60] for daytime surgeries and 1.70 [1.10, 3.10] for nighttime surgeries (p = 0.111). There was no association between nighttime surgery and long-term mortality (aHR: 1.624, 95% CI: 0.589 to 3.662, p = 0.3179). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that nighttime surgeries were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (aOR: 1.089, 95% CI: 0.208 to 3.711, p = 0.905). No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group.

Conclusion: This analysis found no significant association between nocturnal elective CABG operations and increased long-term or one-year mortality. This study did not aim to evaluate the economics of nocturnal surgeries at the investigated institution. To confirm our results that there is no increased morbidity and mortality associated with nocturnal CABG operations, and to understand the economic impact of nocturnal surgeries, prospective randomized studies would be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信