Ikram Chamtouri, Melek Kechida, Walid Jomaa, Khaldoun Ben Hamda
{"title":"Medical students' evaluation by serious game in the era of Covid-19 infection.","authors":"Ikram Chamtouri, Melek Kechida, Walid Jomaa, Khaldoun Ben Hamda","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v103i2.5012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation using serious games (SG) has emerged in the field of training and assessment of medical students.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to compare the results of medical students' evaluation by virtual simulation using online SG and clinical case-based multiple-choice questions (MCQ), and to assess the degree of satisfaction with these two evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students from the same level of study participated in this study. SG group had an evaluation by SG dealing with \"diagnosis and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MCQ group was evaluated by clinical case-based MCQ having the same topic as SG group. Results of the two groups were compared. A satisfaction questionnaire was filled out by the two groups. The satisfaction degree was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 medical students (G1:31 and G2: 33) were enrolled. Thirty learners (96.8%) in SG group obtained a total score ≥ 50% versus 69.7% in clinical case-based MCQ group (p = 0.004). The full score was obtained by three learners in SG group; however, no student scored 100% in clinical case-based MCQ group (p = 0.027). Medical evaluation using SG was reported to be more innovative, fun, and realistic compared to evaluation by clinical case-based MCQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation by SG could be an innovative and effective method in evaluating medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"103 2","pages":"194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v103i2.5012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medical students' evaluation by serious game in the era of Covid-19 infection.
Introduction: Simulation using serious games (SG) has emerged in the field of training and assessment of medical students.
Aim: to compare the results of medical students' evaluation by virtual simulation using online SG and clinical case-based multiple-choice questions (MCQ), and to assess the degree of satisfaction with these two evaluation methods.
Methods: Medical students from the same level of study participated in this study. SG group had an evaluation by SG dealing with "diagnosis and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MCQ group was evaluated by clinical case-based MCQ having the same topic as SG group. Results of the two groups were compared. A satisfaction questionnaire was filled out by the two groups. The satisfaction degree was compared between the two groups.
Results: A total of 64 medical students (G1:31 and G2: 33) were enrolled. Thirty learners (96.8%) in SG group obtained a total score ≥ 50% versus 69.7% in clinical case-based MCQ group (p = 0.004). The full score was obtained by three learners in SG group; however, no student scored 100% in clinical case-based MCQ group (p = 0.027). Medical evaluation using SG was reported to be more innovative, fun, and realistic compared to evaluation by clinical case-based MCQ.
Conclusion: Simulation by SG could be an innovative and effective method in evaluating medical students.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
