新型产科气垫预防剖宫产脊柱麻醉期间低血压:一项随机对照临床试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S499475
Yang Dong, Wei-Wei Cao, Hao Weng, Rong Liu, Ding-Ding Huang
{"title":"新型产科气垫预防剖宫产脊柱麻醉期间低血压:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Yang Dong, Wei-Wei Cao, Hao Weng, Rong Liu, Ding-Ding Huang","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S499475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intravenous administration of large doses of vasopressors to treat hypotension due to spinal anesthesia can adversely affect the fetus and the mother. We assessed the effect of a novel obstetric air cushion pretreatment on the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty parturients were randomly assigned to the air cushion or blank control group (Group A or B, respectively). The air cushion was placed in the lumbar area between the lower border of the costal arch and the iliac crest. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, while the secondary endpoints included norepinephrine dosage, success rate of maternal hypotension management, and adverse reactions like bradycardia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypotension occurred in 50% of the participants in Group A and 75% of those in Group B(<i>P</i>=0.035). Group A (median 4μg, range 0-8μg) required a lower norepinephrine dose than Group B (median 4μg, range 0-12μg; <i>P</i>=0.015). The success rate of hypotension management was significantly higher for Group A at 97.4% than for Group B at 83.3% (<i>P</i>=0.035). Bradycardia was less frequent for Group A than for Group B (10.5% vs 30.6%, <i>P</i>=0.032). Group A also showed a higher umbilical artery blood pH than Group B(<i>P</i>=0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel air cushion pretreatment reduces the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in pregnant women, reduces the dose of single intravenous norepinephrine, improves the success rate of hypotension management, and increases the pH of fetal umbilical artery blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"321-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Obstetric Air Cushion for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Dong, Wei-Wei Cao, Hao Weng, Rong Liu, Ding-Ding Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S499475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intravenous administration of large doses of vasopressors to treat hypotension due to spinal anesthesia can adversely affect the fetus and the mother. We assessed the effect of a novel obstetric air cushion pretreatment on the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty parturients were randomly assigned to the air cushion or blank control group (Group A or B, respectively). The air cushion was placed in the lumbar area between the lower border of the costal arch and the iliac crest. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, while the secondary endpoints included norepinephrine dosage, success rate of maternal hypotension management, and adverse reactions like bradycardia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypotension occurred in 50% of the participants in Group A and 75% of those in Group B(<i>P</i>=0.035). Group A (median 4μg, range 0-8μg) required a lower norepinephrine dose than Group B (median 4μg, range 0-12μg; <i>P</i>=0.015). The success rate of hypotension management was significantly higher for Group A at 97.4% than for Group B at 83.3% (<i>P</i>=0.035). Bradycardia was less frequent for Group A than for Group B (10.5% vs 30.6%, <i>P</i>=0.032). Group A also showed a higher umbilical artery blood pH than Group B(<i>P</i>=0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel air cushion pretreatment reduces the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in pregnant women, reduces the dose of single intravenous norepinephrine, improves the success rate of hypotension management, and increases the pH of fetal umbilical artery blood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"321-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S499475\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S499475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大剂量静脉加压药物治疗脊髓麻醉所致低血压会对胎儿和母亲产生不良影响。我们评估了一种新型产科气垫预处理对脊髓麻醉后低血压发生率的影响。患者和方法:80例产妇随机分为气垫组和空白对照组(A组和B组)。气垫放置在腰椎区,在肋弓下缘和髂骨之间。主要终点是低血压的发生率,次要终点包括去甲肾上腺素剂量、产妇低血压治疗成功率、心动过缓等不良反应。结果:A组低血压发生率为50%,B组为75% (P=0.035)。A组(中位数4μg,范围0-8μg)所需的去甲肾上腺素剂量低于B组(中位数4μg,范围0-12μg;P = 0.015)。A组降压治疗成功率为97.4%,显著高于B组的83.3% (P=0.035)。A组心动过缓发生率低于B组(10.5% vs 30.6%, P=0.032)。A组血pH值高于B组(P=0.026)。结论:新型气垫预处理可降低孕妇腰麻后低血压的发生率,减少单次静脉注射去甲肾上腺素的剂量,提高低血压管理成功率,提高胎儿脐动脉血pH值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Obstetric Air Cushion for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Intravenous administration of large doses of vasopressors to treat hypotension due to spinal anesthesia can adversely affect the fetus and the mother. We assessed the effect of a novel obstetric air cushion pretreatment on the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia.

Patients and methods: Eighty parturients were randomly assigned to the air cushion or blank control group (Group A or B, respectively). The air cushion was placed in the lumbar area between the lower border of the costal arch and the iliac crest. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, while the secondary endpoints included norepinephrine dosage, success rate of maternal hypotension management, and adverse reactions like bradycardia.

Results: Hypotension occurred in 50% of the participants in Group A and 75% of those in Group B(P=0.035). Group A (median 4μg, range 0-8μg) required a lower norepinephrine dose than Group B (median 4μg, range 0-12μg; P=0.015). The success rate of hypotension management was significantly higher for Group A at 97.4% than for Group B at 83.3% (P=0.035). Bradycardia was less frequent for Group A than for Group B (10.5% vs 30.6%, P=0.032). Group A also showed a higher umbilical artery blood pH than Group B(P=0.026).

Conclusion: The novel air cushion pretreatment reduces the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in pregnant women, reduces the dose of single intravenous norepinephrine, improves the success rate of hypotension management, and increases the pH of fetal umbilical artery blood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信