重症监护咨询师水平治疗实践的质性探索。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Paul Twose, Ella Terblanche, Laura Jones, Gabriella Cork, Una Jones
{"title":"重症监护咨询师水平治疗实践的质性探索。","authors":"Paul Twose, Ella Terblanche, Laura Jones, Gabriella Cork, Una Jones","doi":"10.1177/17511437251326776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-medical consultant level roles have been in existence for over 30 years, however the number of allied health professionals (AHPs) working at this level, particularly in critical care, remains relatively small. National guidance highlights the importance of clinicians in these roles to work across the four pillars of practice. However, little research exists regarding the roles undertaken by these consultant-level practitioners, the contributions made to service delivery and their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes. Based on this, the aim of this project was to explore the perceived impact of consultant-level AHPs working within critical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used involving a combination of interviews and focus groups. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit AHPs in consultant-level positions within critical care. Senior medical and nursing staff were then recruited via the AHPs. Data were analysed thematically using the Braun and Clarke methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five consultant-level AHPs were recruited to participate in interviews, with a further 7 participants from senior medical and nursing roles participating in one of two focus groups. The AHPs had been in a consultant-level role for an average of 3.2 years, with all participants reporting over 15 years' experience within critical care. Four core themes were generated from 105 unique codes and 13 subthemes. Personal characteristics were apparent across all themes and therefore was included as a central element. The core themes were (1) scope; (2) status; (3) supportive leadership and (4) impact.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Through four core themes, this study has highlighted the roles undertaken by consultant-level AHPs working in critical care, their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes, and their contribution to local, regional and national workstreams. Where these roles exist, they appear to be well received by senior medical and nursing staff, reporting the benefits of highly experienced members of clinical staff to improve service delivery, patient outcomes and contribute to strategic planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251326776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative exploration of consultant level therapy practice in critical care.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Twose, Ella Terblanche, Laura Jones, Gabriella Cork, Una Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437251326776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-medical consultant level roles have been in existence for over 30 years, however the number of allied health professionals (AHPs) working at this level, particularly in critical care, remains relatively small. National guidance highlights the importance of clinicians in these roles to work across the four pillars of practice. However, little research exists regarding the roles undertaken by these consultant-level practitioners, the contributions made to service delivery and their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes. Based on this, the aim of this project was to explore the perceived impact of consultant-level AHPs working within critical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used involving a combination of interviews and focus groups. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit AHPs in consultant-level positions within critical care. Senior medical and nursing staff were then recruited via the AHPs. Data were analysed thematically using the Braun and Clarke methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five consultant-level AHPs were recruited to participate in interviews, with a further 7 participants from senior medical and nursing roles participating in one of two focus groups. The AHPs had been in a consultant-level role for an average of 3.2 years, with all participants reporting over 15 years' experience within critical care. Four core themes were generated from 105 unique codes and 13 subthemes. Personal characteristics were apparent across all themes and therefore was included as a central element. The core themes were (1) scope; (2) status; (3) supportive leadership and (4) impact.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Through four core themes, this study has highlighted the roles undertaken by consultant-level AHPs working in critical care, their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes, and their contribution to local, regional and national workstreams. Where these roles exist, they appear to be well received by senior medical and nursing staff, reporting the benefits of highly experienced members of clinical staff to improve service delivery, patient outcomes and contribute to strategic planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17511437251326776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251326776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251326776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:非医疗顾问级别的角色已经存在了30多年,然而,在这一级别工作的专职卫生专业人员(ahp)的数量,特别是在重症监护方面,仍然相对较少。国家指南强调了发挥这些作用的临床医生在实践的四大支柱上工作的重要性。然而,关于这些顾问级从业人员所承担的角色、对服务提供的贡献以及他们对患者和服务结果的感知影响的研究很少。基于此,本项目的目的是探讨在危重病护理中工作的顾问级ahp的感知影响。方法:采用访谈和焦点小组相结合的定性研究方法。采用有目的的抽样方法招募在危重病护理部门担任顾问级别职位的ahp。然后通过ahp招聘高级医疗和护理人员。使用布劳恩和克拉克方法对数据进行了主题分析。结果:招募了5名顾问级ahp参加访谈,另外7名来自高级医疗和护理角色的参与者参加了两个焦点小组中的一个。ahp担任顾问级别角色的平均时间为3.2年,所有参与者都报告了超过15年的重症监护经验。从105个唯一代码和13个子主题中生成4个核心主题。个人特征在所有主题中都很明显,因此被列为中心元素。核心主题是(1)范围;(2)地位;(3)支持性领导和(4)影响力。讨论:通过四个核心主题,本研究强调了在重症监护中工作的顾问级ahp所承担的角色,他们对患者和服务结果的感知影响,以及他们对地方、区域和国家工作流程的贡献。在存在这些角色的地方,它们似乎受到高级医疗和护理人员的欢迎,报告了经验丰富的临床工作人员在改善服务提供和患者治疗效果方面的好处,并有助于战略规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative exploration of consultant level therapy practice in critical care.

Introduction: Non-medical consultant level roles have been in existence for over 30 years, however the number of allied health professionals (AHPs) working at this level, particularly in critical care, remains relatively small. National guidance highlights the importance of clinicians in these roles to work across the four pillars of practice. However, little research exists regarding the roles undertaken by these consultant-level practitioners, the contributions made to service delivery and their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes. Based on this, the aim of this project was to explore the perceived impact of consultant-level AHPs working within critical care.

Methods: Qualitative methodology was used involving a combination of interviews and focus groups. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit AHPs in consultant-level positions within critical care. Senior medical and nursing staff were then recruited via the AHPs. Data were analysed thematically using the Braun and Clarke methodology.

Results: Five consultant-level AHPs were recruited to participate in interviews, with a further 7 participants from senior medical and nursing roles participating in one of two focus groups. The AHPs had been in a consultant-level role for an average of 3.2 years, with all participants reporting over 15 years' experience within critical care. Four core themes were generated from 105 unique codes and 13 subthemes. Personal characteristics were apparent across all themes and therefore was included as a central element. The core themes were (1) scope; (2) status; (3) supportive leadership and (4) impact.

Discussion: Through four core themes, this study has highlighted the roles undertaken by consultant-level AHPs working in critical care, their perceived impact on patient and service outcomes, and their contribution to local, regional and national workstreams. Where these roles exist, they appear to be well received by senior medical and nursing staff, reporting the benefits of highly experienced members of clinical staff to improve service delivery, patient outcomes and contribute to strategic planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信