John Summers, Vijay Swarup, Ian Parker, Joseph Bumgarner, Andrew Brenyo, Layth Saleh, Sadanandan, Javier Sanchez, Robert Beasley, Sanjaya Gupta
{"title":"基于密封剂的新型血管封闭装置在电生理学手术后的安全性和有效性:ReliaSeal 试验","authors":"John Summers, Vijay Swarup, Ian Parker, Joseph Bumgarner, Andrew Brenyo, Layth Saleh, Sadanandan, Javier Sanchez, Robert Beasley, Sanjaya Gupta","doi":"10.1111/jce.16623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis, a novel vascular closure device (VCD) was designed to achieve faster hemostasis without compromising safety. The objective of the ReliaSeal trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Mynx Control Venous VCD to close a single or multiple femoral venous access sites in one or both limbs in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ReliaSeal trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing VCD to MC in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures requiring single or multiple access sites utilizing up to 12F sheaths. Endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to hemostasis (TTH), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), procedural/device success, and 30-day major and minor access site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seventy subjects were randomized to the VCD or MC arm (n = 177 vs. n = 93) with a mean age of 66.7 ± 11.27 years. TTA, TTH, and TTDE were significantly reduced in VCD subjects compared to MC (TTA: 2.6 ± 1.03 vs. 5.1 ± 4.35 h, p < 0.001; TTH: 2.1 ± 1.79 vs. 11.4 ± 7.19 min, p < 0.001; TTDE: 3.1 ± 1.24 vs. 5.5 ± 4.58 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Procedural and device success was achieved in 100% of VCD subjects, compared to 98.9% of the MC group. No major or minor complications occurred in the VCD group; with a 5% minor complication rate in the MC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of VCD resulted in significant reductions in TTA, TTH, and TTDE, with no major or minor complications and a high success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Sealant-Based Vascular Closure Device Following Electrophysiology Procedures: ReliaSeal Trial.\",\"authors\":\"John Summers, Vijay Swarup, Ian Parker, Joseph Bumgarner, Andrew Brenyo, Layth Saleh, Sadanandan, Javier Sanchez, Robert Beasley, Sanjaya Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis, a novel vascular closure device (VCD) was designed to achieve faster hemostasis without compromising safety. The objective of the ReliaSeal trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Mynx Control Venous VCD to close a single or multiple femoral venous access sites in one or both limbs in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ReliaSeal trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing VCD to MC in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures requiring single or multiple access sites utilizing up to 12F sheaths. Endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to hemostasis (TTH), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), procedural/device success, and 30-day major and minor access site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seventy subjects were randomized to the VCD or MC arm (n = 177 vs. n = 93) with a mean age of 66.7 ± 11.27 years. TTA, TTH, and TTDE were significantly reduced in VCD subjects compared to MC (TTA: 2.6 ± 1.03 vs. 5.1 ± 4.35 h, p < 0.001; TTH: 2.1 ± 1.79 vs. 11.4 ± 7.19 min, p < 0.001; TTDE: 3.1 ± 1.24 vs. 5.5 ± 4.58 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Procedural and device success was achieved in 100% of VCD subjects, compared to 98.9% of the MC group. No major or minor complications occurred in the VCD group; with a 5% minor complication rate in the MC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of VCD resulted in significant reductions in TTA, TTH, and TTDE, with no major or minor complications and a high success rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然手动加压(MC)仍然是实现止血的标准护理,但一种新型血管关闭装置(VCD)被设计用于在不影响安全性的情况下实现更快的止血。ReliaSeal试验的目的是评估Mynx Control静脉VCD在接受导管手术的患者中关闭单侧或双侧单侧或多侧股静脉通路的安全性和有效性。方法:ReliaSeal试验是一项前瞻性,随机对照试验,比较VCD和MC在接受导管手术的患者中需要使用高达12F的导管进行单或多通道手术。终点包括活动时间(TTA)、止血时间(TTH)、出院资格时间(TTDE)、手术/器械成功以及30天内主要和次要通路部位并发症。结果:270名受试者随机分为VCD组和MC组(n = 177 vs. n = 93),平均年龄为66.7±11.27岁。与MC组相比,VCD组TTA、TTH和TTDE明显降低(TTA: 2.6±1.03∶5.1±4.35 h, p)。结论:VCD组TTA、TTH和TTDE明显降低,无重大或轻微并发症,成功率高。
Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Sealant-Based Vascular Closure Device Following Electrophysiology Procedures: ReliaSeal Trial.
Background: While manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis, a novel vascular closure device (VCD) was designed to achieve faster hemostasis without compromising safety. The objective of the ReliaSeal trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Mynx Control Venous VCD to close a single or multiple femoral venous access sites in one or both limbs in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures.
Methods: The ReliaSeal trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing VCD to MC in patients undergoing catheter-based procedures requiring single or multiple access sites utilizing up to 12F sheaths. Endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to hemostasis (TTH), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), procedural/device success, and 30-day major and minor access site complications.
Results: Two hundred and seventy subjects were randomized to the VCD or MC arm (n = 177 vs. n = 93) with a mean age of 66.7 ± 11.27 years. TTA, TTH, and TTDE were significantly reduced in VCD subjects compared to MC (TTA: 2.6 ± 1.03 vs. 5.1 ± 4.35 h, p < 0.001; TTH: 2.1 ± 1.79 vs. 11.4 ± 7.19 min, p < 0.001; TTDE: 3.1 ± 1.24 vs. 5.5 ± 4.58 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Procedural and device success was achieved in 100% of VCD subjects, compared to 98.9% of the MC group. No major or minor complications occurred in the VCD group; with a 5% minor complication rate in the MC group.
Conclusion: The use of VCD resulted in significant reductions in TTA, TTH, and TTDE, with no major or minor complications and a high success rate.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.