帕金森病的自动影像鉴别。

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David E Vaillancourt, Angelos Barmpoutis, Samuel S Wu, Jesse C DeSimone, Marissa Schauder, Robin Chen, Todd B Parrish, Wei-En Wang, Eric Molho, John C Morgan, David K Simon, Burton L Scott, Liana S Rosenthal, Stephen N Gomperts, Rizwan S Akhtar, David Grimes, Sol De Jesus, Natividad Stover, Ece Bayram, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Stefan Prokop, Ruogu Fang, John T Slevin, Prabesh Kanel, Nicolaas I Bohnen, Paul Tuite, Stephen Aradi, Antonio P Strafella, Mustafa S Siddiqui, Albert A Davis, Xuemei Huang, Jill L Ostrem, Hubert Fernandez, Irene Litvan, Robert A Hauser, Alexander Pantelyat, Nikolaus R McFarland, Tao Xie, Michael S Okun, Alicia Leader, Áine Russell, Hannah Babcock, Karen White-Tong, Jun Hua, Anna E Goodheart, Erin Colleen Peterec, Cynthia Poon, Max B Galarce, Tanya Thompson, Autumn M Collier, Candace Cromer, Natt Putra, Reilly Costello, Eda Yilmaz, Crystal Mercado, Tomas Mercado, Amanda Fessenden, Renee Wagner, C Chauncey Spears, Jacqueline L Caswell, Marina Bryants, Kristyn Kuzianik, Youshra Ahmed, Nathaniel Bendahan, Joy O Njoku, Amy Stiebel, Hengameh Zahed, Sarah S Wang, Phuong T Hoang, Joseph Seemiller, Guangwei Du
{"title":"帕金森病的自动影像鉴别。","authors":"David E Vaillancourt, Angelos Barmpoutis, Samuel S Wu, Jesse C DeSimone, Marissa Schauder, Robin Chen, Todd B Parrish, Wei-En Wang, Eric Molho, John C Morgan, David K Simon, Burton L Scott, Liana S Rosenthal, Stephen N Gomperts, Rizwan S Akhtar, David Grimes, Sol De Jesus, Natividad Stover, Ece Bayram, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Stefan Prokop, Ruogu Fang, John T Slevin, Prabesh Kanel, Nicolaas I Bohnen, Paul Tuite, Stephen Aradi, Antonio P Strafella, Mustafa S Siddiqui, Albert A Davis, Xuemei Huang, Jill L Ostrem, Hubert Fernandez, Irene Litvan, Robert A Hauser, Alexander Pantelyat, Nikolaus R McFarland, Tao Xie, Michael S Okun, Alicia Leader, Áine Russell, Hannah Babcock, Karen White-Tong, Jun Hua, Anna E Goodheart, Erin Colleen Peterec, Cynthia Poon, Max B Galarce, Tanya Thompson, Autumn M Collier, Candace Cromer, Natt Putra, Reilly Costello, Eda Yilmaz, Crystal Mercado, Tomas Mercado, Amanda Fessenden, Renee Wagner, C Chauncey Spears, Jacqueline L Caswell, Marina Bryants, Kristyn Kuzianik, Youshra Ahmed, Nathaniel Bendahan, Joy O Njoku, Amy Stiebel, Hengameh Zahed, Sarah S Wang, Phuong T Hoang, Joseph Seemiller, Guangwei Du","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) paired with appropriate disease-specific machine learning holds promise for the clinical differentiation of Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) parkinsonian variant, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). A prospective study is needed to test whether the approach meets primary end points to be considered in a diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the discriminative performance of Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) using 3-T diffusion MRI and support vector machine (SVM) learning.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted from July 2021 to January 2024 across 21 Parkinson Study Group sites (US/Canada). Included were patients with PD, MSA, and PSP with established criteria and unanimous agreement in the clinical diagnosis among 3 independent, blinded neurologists who specialize in movement disorders. Patients were assigned to a training set or an independent testing set.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>MRI.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the testing set for primary model end points of PD vs atypical parkinsonism, MSA vs PSP, PD vs MSA, and PD vs PSP. AIDP was also paired with antemortem MRI to test against postmortem neuropathology in a subset of autopsy cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 patients were screened and 249 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [7.7] years; 155 male [62.2%]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 99 had PD, 53 had MSA, and 97 had PSP. A retrospective cohort of 396 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.9] years; 234 male [59.1%]) was also included. Of these patients, 211 had PD, 98 had MSA, and 87 had PSP. Patients were assigned to the training set (78%; 104 prospective, 396 retrospective) or independent testing set, which included 145 (22%; 60 PD, 27 MSA, 58 PSP) prospective patients (mean age, 67.4 [SD 7.7] years; 95 male [65.5%]). The model was robust in differentiating PD vs atypical parkinsonism (AUROC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; positive predictive value [PPV], 0.91; negative predictive value [NPV], 0.83), MSA vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.98; NPV, 0.81), PD vs MSA (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.97; NPV, 0.97), and PD vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.92; NPV, 0.98). AIDP predictions were confirmed neuropathologically in 46 of 49 brains (93.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This prospective multicenter cohort study of AIDP met its primary end points. Results suggest using AIDP in the diagnostic workup for common parkinsonian syndromes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":"495-505"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism.\",\"authors\":\"David E Vaillancourt, Angelos Barmpoutis, Samuel S Wu, Jesse C DeSimone, Marissa Schauder, Robin Chen, Todd B Parrish, Wei-En Wang, Eric Molho, John C Morgan, David K Simon, Burton L Scott, Liana S Rosenthal, Stephen N Gomperts, Rizwan S Akhtar, David Grimes, Sol De Jesus, Natividad Stover, Ece Bayram, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Stefan Prokop, Ruogu Fang, John T Slevin, Prabesh Kanel, Nicolaas I Bohnen, Paul Tuite, Stephen Aradi, Antonio P Strafella, Mustafa S Siddiqui, Albert A Davis, Xuemei Huang, Jill L Ostrem, Hubert Fernandez, Irene Litvan, Robert A Hauser, Alexander Pantelyat, Nikolaus R McFarland, Tao Xie, Michael S Okun, Alicia Leader, Áine Russell, Hannah Babcock, Karen White-Tong, Jun Hua, Anna E Goodheart, Erin Colleen Peterec, Cynthia Poon, Max B Galarce, Tanya Thompson, Autumn M Collier, Candace Cromer, Natt Putra, Reilly Costello, Eda Yilmaz, Crystal Mercado, Tomas Mercado, Amanda Fessenden, Renee Wagner, C Chauncey Spears, Jacqueline L Caswell, Marina Bryants, Kristyn Kuzianik, Youshra Ahmed, Nathaniel Bendahan, Joy O Njoku, Amy Stiebel, Hengameh Zahed, Sarah S Wang, Phuong T Hoang, Joseph Seemiller, Guangwei Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) paired with appropriate disease-specific machine learning holds promise for the clinical differentiation of Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) parkinsonian variant, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). A prospective study is needed to test whether the approach meets primary end points to be considered in a diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the discriminative performance of Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) using 3-T diffusion MRI and support vector machine (SVM) learning.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted from July 2021 to January 2024 across 21 Parkinson Study Group sites (US/Canada). Included were patients with PD, MSA, and PSP with established criteria and unanimous agreement in the clinical diagnosis among 3 independent, blinded neurologists who specialize in movement disorders. Patients were assigned to a training set or an independent testing set.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>MRI.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the testing set for primary model end points of PD vs atypical parkinsonism, MSA vs PSP, PD vs MSA, and PD vs PSP. AIDP was also paired with antemortem MRI to test against postmortem neuropathology in a subset of autopsy cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 patients were screened and 249 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [7.7] years; 155 male [62.2%]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 99 had PD, 53 had MSA, and 97 had PSP. A retrospective cohort of 396 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.9] years; 234 male [59.1%]) was also included. Of these patients, 211 had PD, 98 had MSA, and 87 had PSP. Patients were assigned to the training set (78%; 104 prospective, 396 retrospective) or independent testing set, which included 145 (22%; 60 PD, 27 MSA, 58 PSP) prospective patients (mean age, 67.4 [SD 7.7] years; 95 male [65.5%]). The model was robust in differentiating PD vs atypical parkinsonism (AUROC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; positive predictive value [PPV], 0.91; negative predictive value [NPV], 0.83), MSA vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.98; NPV, 0.81), PD vs MSA (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.97; NPV, 0.97), and PD vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.92; NPV, 0.98). AIDP predictions were confirmed neuropathologically in 46 of 49 brains (93.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This prospective multicenter cohort study of AIDP met its primary end points. Results suggest using AIDP in the diagnostic workup for common parkinsonian syndromes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"495-505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0112\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:磁共振成像(MRI)与适当的疾病特异性机器学习相结合,为帕金森病(PD)、多系统萎缩(MSA)帕金森变体和进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)的临床鉴别带来了希望。需要一项前瞻性研究来检验该方法是否满足诊断检查中要考虑的主要终点。目的:评价基于3-T弥散MRI和支持向量机(SVM)学习的帕金森病(AIDP)自动成像鉴别性能。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究,于2021年7月至2024年1月在21个帕金森研究组(美国/加拿大)进行。纳入了PD、MSA和PSP患者,这些患者在3位独立的、盲眼的、专门研究运动障碍的神经学家的临床诊断中具有既定的标准和一致的意见。患者被分配到一个训练集或一个独立的测试集。曝光:核磁共振成像。主要结果和测量:PD与非典型帕金森病、MSA与PSP、PD与MSA、PD与PSP的主要模型终点测试集中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。AIDP还与死前MRI配对,以检测部分尸检病例的死后神经病理学。结果:共筛选316例患者,249例患者(平均[SD]年龄67.8[7.7]岁;155名男性[62.2%])符合纳入标准。在这些患者中,99例患有PD, 53例患有MSA, 97例患有PSP。回顾性队列研究396例患者(平均[SD]年龄65.8[8.9]岁;其中男性234例(59.1%)。在这些患者中,211例患有PD, 98例患有MSA, 87例患有PSP。患者被分配到训练集(78%;104项前瞻性试验,396项回顾性试验)或独立试验,包括145项(22%;PD 60例,MSA 27例,PSP 58例)(平均年龄67.4 [SD 7.7]岁;男性95例[65.5%])。该模型在区分帕金森病与非典型帕金森病方面是稳健的(AUROC, 0.96;95% ci, 0.93-0.99;阳性预测值[PPV], 0.91;阴性预测值[NPV], 0.83), MSA vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98;95% ci, 0.96-1.00;PPV 0.98;NPV, 0.81), PD vs MSA (AUROC, 0.98;95% ci, 0.96-1.00;PPV 0.97;NPV, 0.97), PD vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98;95% ci, 0.96-1.00;PPV 0.92;NPV, 0.98)。49个脑中有46个(93.9%)的AIDP预测得到神经病理学证实。结论和相关性:这项AIDP的前瞻性多中心队列研究达到了其主要终点。结果提示在常见帕金森综合征的诊断检查中使用AIDP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism.

Importance: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) paired with appropriate disease-specific machine learning holds promise for the clinical differentiation of Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) parkinsonian variant, and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). A prospective study is needed to test whether the approach meets primary end points to be considered in a diagnostic workup.

Objective: To assess the discriminative performance of Automated Imaging Differentiation for Parkinsonism (AIDP) using 3-T diffusion MRI and support vector machine (SVM) learning.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted from July 2021 to January 2024 across 21 Parkinson Study Group sites (US/Canada). Included were patients with PD, MSA, and PSP with established criteria and unanimous agreement in the clinical diagnosis among 3 independent, blinded neurologists who specialize in movement disorders. Patients were assigned to a training set or an independent testing set.

Exposure: MRI.

Main outcomes and measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the testing set for primary model end points of PD vs atypical parkinsonism, MSA vs PSP, PD vs MSA, and PD vs PSP. AIDP was also paired with antemortem MRI to test against postmortem neuropathology in a subset of autopsy cases.

Results: A total of 316 patients were screened and 249 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [7.7] years; 155 male [62.2%]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 99 had PD, 53 had MSA, and 97 had PSP. A retrospective cohort of 396 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.9] years; 234 male [59.1%]) was also included. Of these patients, 211 had PD, 98 had MSA, and 87 had PSP. Patients were assigned to the training set (78%; 104 prospective, 396 retrospective) or independent testing set, which included 145 (22%; 60 PD, 27 MSA, 58 PSP) prospective patients (mean age, 67.4 [SD 7.7] years; 95 male [65.5%]). The model was robust in differentiating PD vs atypical parkinsonism (AUROC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; positive predictive value [PPV], 0.91; negative predictive value [NPV], 0.83), MSA vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.98; NPV, 0.81), PD vs MSA (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.97; NPV, 0.97), and PD vs PSP (AUROC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; PPV, 0.92; NPV, 0.98). AIDP predictions were confirmed neuropathologically in 46 of 49 brains (93.9%).

Conclusions and relevance: This prospective multicenter cohort study of AIDP met its primary end points. Results suggest using AIDP in the diagnostic workup for common parkinsonian syndromes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信