Roy W Beck, Ryan J Bailey, Halis K Akturk, Shafaq Rizvi, Yogish Kudva, Thomas Blevins, Mei Mei Church, Anastasios Manessis, Peter Calhoun, Katrina J Ruedy, Irl B Hirsch
{"title":"成人1型糖尿病患者吸入Technosphere胰岛素加Degludec胰岛素13周单臂评价","authors":"Roy W Beck, Ryan J Bailey, Halis K Akturk, Shafaq Rizvi, Yogish Kudva, Thomas Blevins, Mei Mei Church, Anastasios Manessis, Peter Calhoun, Katrina J Ruedy, Irl B Hirsch","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Inhaled technosphere insulin (TI, Afrezza®) has a more rapid onset of action than rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAA). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-nine adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) initiated a regimen of TI plus insulin degludec for 13 weeks after completing 17 weeks in the usual-care control group of a randomized trial. The initial TI dose, based on bioequivalence, was approximately two times the RAA dose being used. The primary outcome was noninferiority for daytime time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL at 13 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the preceding 17-week period (baseline), 41% of the 49 participants were using automated insulin delivery (AID), 6% a predictive-low-glucose-suspend pump, 4% a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), and 49% multiple daily injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Daytime TIR increased from 50% ± 17% at baseline to 55% ± 20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 9.8%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.04), with an increase of 8.6% compared with baseline MDI/SAP and no change compared with baseline AID. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.23% (95% CI: -0.42% to -0.04%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.02), with mean change of -0.36% compared with MDI/SAP and 0.0% compared with AID. Participants meeting the HbA1c target of <7.0% increased from 14% to 31% (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Among baseline AID users, overnight TIR decreased by 15.6% when switched to TI-degludec, whereas among baseline MDI/SAP users, overnight TIR increased by 2.0%. Mean time <54 mg/dL was 0.5% ± 0.7% at baseline and 0.7% ± 0.8% after 13 weeks (mean change 0.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 0.5%). After 13 weeks, 40% of participants indicated a desire to continue using TI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In adults with T1D, glycemic outcomes were comparable or slightly better with TI-degludec after switching from AID or MDI. TI should be considered as an option for individuals who want an alternative to using an insulin pump or MDI for insulin delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":"27 3","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 13-Week Single-Arm Evaluation of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Plus Insulin Degludec for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Roy W Beck, Ryan J Bailey, Halis K Akturk, Shafaq Rizvi, Yogish Kudva, Thomas Blevins, Mei Mei Church, Anastasios Manessis, Peter Calhoun, Katrina J Ruedy, Irl B Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2024.0581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Inhaled technosphere insulin (TI, Afrezza®) has a more rapid onset of action than rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAA). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-nine adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) initiated a regimen of TI plus insulin degludec for 13 weeks after completing 17 weeks in the usual-care control group of a randomized trial. The initial TI dose, based on bioequivalence, was approximately two times the RAA dose being used. The primary outcome was noninferiority for daytime time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL at 13 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the preceding 17-week period (baseline), 41% of the 49 participants were using automated insulin delivery (AID), 6% a predictive-low-glucose-suspend pump, 4% a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), and 49% multiple daily injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Daytime TIR increased from 50% ± 17% at baseline to 55% ± 20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 9.8%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.04), with an increase of 8.6% compared with baseline MDI/SAP and no change compared with baseline AID. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.23% (95% CI: -0.42% to -0.04%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.02), with mean change of -0.36% compared with MDI/SAP and 0.0% compared with AID. Participants meeting the HbA1c target of <7.0% increased from 14% to 31% (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Among baseline AID users, overnight TIR decreased by 15.6% when switched to TI-degludec, whereas among baseline MDI/SAP users, overnight TIR increased by 2.0%. Mean time <54 mg/dL was 0.5% ± 0.7% at baseline and 0.7% ± 0.8% after 13 weeks (mean change 0.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 0.5%). After 13 weeks, 40% of participants indicated a desire to continue using TI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In adults with T1D, glycemic outcomes were comparable or slightly better with TI-degludec after switching from AID or MDI. TI should be considered as an option for individuals who want an alternative to using an insulin pump or MDI for insulin delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"161-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0581\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:吸入技圈胰岛素(TI,Afrezza®)比速效胰岛素类似物(RAA)起效更快。方法:49名1型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者在随机试验的常规护理对照组完成17周的治疗后,开始了为期13周的TI加胰岛素degludec治疗。根据生物等效性,TI 的初始剂量约为目前使用的 RAA 剂量的两倍。主要结果是 13 周时日间时间范围 (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL 的非劣效性。结果在之前的 17 周期间(基线),49 名参与者中有 41% 使用自动胰岛素输送系统 (AID),6% 使用预测低血糖暂停泵,4% 使用传感器增强泵 (SAP),49% 使用每日多次注射 (MDI) 加持续葡萄糖监测。日间 TIR 从基线时的 50% ± 17% 增加到 13 周后的 55% ± 20%(平均变化 5.1%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.3% 至 9.8%):与基线 MDI/SAP 相比增加了 8.6%,与基线 AID 相比没有变化。HbA1c 与基线相比的平均变化为 -0.23%(95% CI:-0.42% 至 -0.04%,非劣效性 P <0.001,优效性 P =0.02),与 MDI/SAP 相比平均变化为 -0.36%,与 AID 相比平均变化为 0.0%。达到 HbA1c 目标的参与者 P = 0.02)。在基线 AID 使用者中,改用 TI-degludec 后,过夜 TIR 下降了 15.6%,而在基线 MDI/SAP 使用者中,过夜 TIR 上升了 2.0%。平均时间 结论在成人 T1D 患者中,从 AID 或 MDI 转用 TI-degludec 后,血糖结果相当或略有改善。对于那些希望在使用胰岛素泵或 MDI 输送胰岛素之外选择 TI 的患者,应考虑将 TI 作为一种选择。
A 13-Week Single-Arm Evaluation of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Plus Insulin Degludec for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
Background: Inhaled technosphere insulin (TI, Afrezza®) has a more rapid onset of action than rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAA). Methods: Forty-nine adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) initiated a regimen of TI plus insulin degludec for 13 weeks after completing 17 weeks in the usual-care control group of a randomized trial. The initial TI dose, based on bioequivalence, was approximately two times the RAA dose being used. The primary outcome was noninferiority for daytime time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL at 13 weeks. Results: During the preceding 17-week period (baseline), 41% of the 49 participants were using automated insulin delivery (AID), 6% a predictive-low-glucose-suspend pump, 4% a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), and 49% multiple daily injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Daytime TIR increased from 50% ± 17% at baseline to 55% ± 20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 9.8%, noninferiority P < 0.001, superiority P = 0.04), with an increase of 8.6% compared with baseline MDI/SAP and no change compared with baseline AID. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.23% (95% CI: -0.42% to -0.04%, noninferiority P < 0.001, superiority P = 0.02), with mean change of -0.36% compared with MDI/SAP and 0.0% compared with AID. Participants meeting the HbA1c target of <7.0% increased from 14% to 31% (P = 0.02). Among baseline AID users, overnight TIR decreased by 15.6% when switched to TI-degludec, whereas among baseline MDI/SAP users, overnight TIR increased by 2.0%. Mean time <54 mg/dL was 0.5% ± 0.7% at baseline and 0.7% ± 0.8% after 13 weeks (mean change 0.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 0.5%). After 13 weeks, 40% of participants indicated a desire to continue using TI. Conclusions: In adults with T1D, glycemic outcomes were comparable or slightly better with TI-degludec after switching from AID or MDI. TI should be considered as an option for individuals who want an alternative to using an insulin pump or MDI for insulin delivery.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.