慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺炎风险的城乡差异:一项全国性的基于登记的研究

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2025.2477386
Allan Klitgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺炎风险的城乡差异:一项全国性的基于登记的研究","authors":"Allan Klitgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2025.2477386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urban-rural differences in treatment within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been documented in Denmark, and we aim to investigate such differences in the risk of pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Danish register-based cross-sectional study including patients with an International Classification of Diseases 10<sup>th</sup> revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code of COPD (J.44) alive on the 31st of December 2018 (99,057 patients). Patients were grouped by municipality type on an urban-rural gradient (capital, metropolitan, provincial, commuter, rural). We identified outpatient pneumonias (redeemed prescriptions of antibiotics typically used for pneumonia) and pneumonia hospitalizations (ICD-10 codes) during 2018. Three groups were defined: 1) No pneumonia, 2) at least one outpatient pneumonia (but no pneumonia hospitalization), and 3) at least one pneumonia hospitalization. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was performed with municipality type as main explanatory variable. The 'No pneumonia' group was used as reference outcome group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients outside capital municipalities had significantly increased risk of experiencing outpatient pneumonia (Metropolitan: Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.39. Provincial: OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.21-1.31. Commuter: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.31. Rural: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.33). No significant differences were found for pneumonia hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to patients in capital municipalities, patients with a hospital-registered COPD diagnosis in non-capital municipalities had a higher risk of annually redeeming at least one prescription for antibiotics typically used for outpatient pneumonia. We were unable to detect differences in pneumonia hospitalization between municipality types. Our study was not designed to assess causality, and we stress the need for future research to provide actionable insights for health policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"2477386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban-rural differences in pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide register-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Allan Klitgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2025.2477386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urban-rural differences in treatment within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been documented in Denmark, and we aim to investigate such differences in the risk of pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Danish register-based cross-sectional study including patients with an International Classification of Diseases 10<sup>th</sup> revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code of COPD (J.44) alive on the 31st of December 2018 (99,057 patients). Patients were grouped by municipality type on an urban-rural gradient (capital, metropolitan, provincial, commuter, rural). We identified outpatient pneumonias (redeemed prescriptions of antibiotics typically used for pneumonia) and pneumonia hospitalizations (ICD-10 codes) during 2018. Three groups were defined: 1) No pneumonia, 2) at least one outpatient pneumonia (but no pneumonia hospitalization), and 3) at least one pneumonia hospitalization. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was performed with municipality type as main explanatory variable. The 'No pneumonia' group was used as reference outcome group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients outside capital municipalities had significantly increased risk of experiencing outpatient pneumonia (Metropolitan: Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.39. Provincial: OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.21-1.31. Commuter: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.31. Rural: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.33). No significant differences were found for pneumonia hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to patients in capital municipalities, patients with a hospital-registered COPD diagnosis in non-capital municipalities had a higher risk of annually redeeming at least one prescription for antibiotics typically used for outpatient pneumonia. We were unable to detect differences in pneumonia hospitalization between municipality types. Our study was not designed to assess causality, and we stress the need for future research to provide actionable insights for health policy makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"2477386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2477386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2477386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:丹麦慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗的城乡差异已被记录,我们的目标是调查肺炎风险的这种差异。方法:一项基于丹麦登记的横断面研究,包括2018年12月31日在世的国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10) COPD诊断代码(J.44)患者(99,057例)。患者按城市类型按城乡梯度分组(首都、大都市、省、通勤者、农村)。我们在2018年确定了门诊肺炎(通常用于肺炎的抗生素处方)和肺炎住院(ICD-10代码)。定义三组:1)无肺炎,2)至少一次门诊肺炎(但没有肺炎住院),3)至少一次肺炎住院。以城市类型为主要解释变量,建立多元多项式logistic回归模型。“无肺炎”组作为参考结果组。结果:非首都城市的患者经历门诊肺炎的风险显著增加(大都市:优势比(OR) = 1.32, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.25-1.39。省级:OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.21-1.31。通勤者:OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.31。农村:OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.33)。肺炎住院率无显著差异。结论:与首都城市的患者相比,非首都城市医院登记的慢性阻塞性肺病患者每年至少有一次使用通常用于门诊肺炎的抗生素处方的风险更高。我们无法发现不同城市类型间肺炎住院的差异。我们的研究不是为了评估因果关系而设计的,我们强调未来的研究需要为卫生政策制定者提供可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urban-rural differences in pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide register-based study.

Background: Urban-rural differences in treatment within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been documented in Denmark, and we aim to investigate such differences in the risk of pneumonia.

Methods: A Danish register-based cross-sectional study including patients with an International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code of COPD (J.44) alive on the 31st of December 2018 (99,057 patients). Patients were grouped by municipality type on an urban-rural gradient (capital, metropolitan, provincial, commuter, rural). We identified outpatient pneumonias (redeemed prescriptions of antibiotics typically used for pneumonia) and pneumonia hospitalizations (ICD-10 codes) during 2018. Three groups were defined: 1) No pneumonia, 2) at least one outpatient pneumonia (but no pneumonia hospitalization), and 3) at least one pneumonia hospitalization. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was performed with municipality type as main explanatory variable. The 'No pneumonia' group was used as reference outcome group.

Results: Patients outside capital municipalities had significantly increased risk of experiencing outpatient pneumonia (Metropolitan: Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.39. Provincial: OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.21-1.31. Commuter: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20-1.31. Rural: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.23-1.33). No significant differences were found for pneumonia hospitalization.

Conclusions: Compared to patients in capital municipalities, patients with a hospital-registered COPD diagnosis in non-capital municipalities had a higher risk of annually redeeming at least one prescription for antibiotics typically used for outpatient pneumonia. We were unable to detect differences in pneumonia hospitalization between municipality types. Our study was not designed to assess causality, and we stress the need for future research to provide actionable insights for health policy makers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信