Gustav Sandén, Petrus Vinnars, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Johan Svensson, Martin Rutegård
{"title":"直肠癌长期新辅助治疗前造口与无造口的比较。","authors":"Gustav Sandén, Petrus Vinnars, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Johan Svensson, Martin Rutegård","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large bowel obstruction is a possible complication in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer; however, it may be prevented by placing a pretreatment defunctioning stoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate complication rates in patients with rectal cancer undergoing long-course neoadjuvant therapy, comparing those with and without a prophylactic stoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2022 in Region Västerbotten, Sweden, were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients not planned for curative long-course neoadjuvant therapy and those requiring a stoma due to urgent bowel-related issues before treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of complications between diagnosis and resection surgery or end of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were 30-day complications following resection, time to treatment (neoadjuvant therapy and surgery), and overall survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used, with adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade, and clinical tumour stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 482 identified patients, 105 were analysed after exclusion. Among these, 22.9% (24 of 105) received a pretreatment stoma, whereas 77.1% (81 of 105) received upfront neoadjuvant therapy. The complication incidence before resection in the group with a defunctioning stoma and in the group without a defunctioning stoma was 75.0% (18 of 24) and 29.6% (24 of 81) respectively. A considerable number of complications were directly caused by the stoma surgery. Patients in the stoma group had an adjusted OR of 6.71 (95% c.i. 2.17 to 20.76) for any complication. However, for 30-day complications following resection, an adjusted non-significant OR of 2.05 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 6.81) was documented for the stoma group, in comparison with the control group. Neoadjuvant treatment was also delayed for the stoma group (adjusted mean time difference: 21 (95% c.i. 14 to 27) days), whereas the difference was not significant for the time to resection surgery. The median survival after diagnosis was 4.7 years in the stoma group and 12.2 years in the control group (P = 0.015); however, adjustment in the multivariable analysis rendered the estimate non-significant (HR 1.71 (95% c.i. 0.93 to 3.14)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with rectal cancer who receive a stoma before long-course neoadjuvant therapy, in the absence of urgent symptoms, experience more complications than those without a stoma and a delay with regard to the start of neoadjuvant treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stoma versus no stoma prior to long-course neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Gustav Sandén, Petrus Vinnars, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Johan Svensson, Martin Rutegård\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large bowel obstruction is a possible complication in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer; however, it may be prevented by placing a pretreatment defunctioning stoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate complication rates in patients with rectal cancer undergoing long-course neoadjuvant therapy, comparing those with and without a prophylactic stoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2022 in Region Västerbotten, Sweden, were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients not planned for curative long-course neoadjuvant therapy and those requiring a stoma due to urgent bowel-related issues before treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of complications between diagnosis and resection surgery or end of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were 30-day complications following resection, time to treatment (neoadjuvant therapy and surgery), and overall survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used, with adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade, and clinical tumour stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 482 identified patients, 105 were analysed after exclusion. Among these, 22.9% (24 of 105) received a pretreatment stoma, whereas 77.1% (81 of 105) received upfront neoadjuvant therapy. The complication incidence before resection in the group with a defunctioning stoma and in the group without a defunctioning stoma was 75.0% (18 of 24) and 29.6% (24 of 81) respectively. A considerable number of complications were directly caused by the stoma surgery. Patients in the stoma group had an adjusted OR of 6.71 (95% c.i. 2.17 to 20.76) for any complication. However, for 30-day complications following resection, an adjusted non-significant OR of 2.05 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 6.81) was documented for the stoma group, in comparison with the control group. Neoadjuvant treatment was also delayed for the stoma group (adjusted mean time difference: 21 (95% c.i. 14 to 27) days), whereas the difference was not significant for the time to resection surgery. The median survival after diagnosis was 4.7 years in the stoma group and 12.2 years in the control group (P = 0.015); however, adjustment in the multivariable analysis rendered the estimate non-significant (HR 1.71 (95% c.i. 0.93 to 3.14)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with rectal cancer who receive a stoma before long-course neoadjuvant therapy, in the absence of urgent symptoms, experience more complications than those without a stoma and a delay with regard to the start of neoadjuvant treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大肠梗阻是直肠癌新辅助治疗患者可能出现的并发症;然而,它可以通过放置预处理去功能造口来预防。本回顾性研究的目的是调查接受长期新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者的并发症发生率,比较有和没有预防性造口的患者。方法:所有2007年至2022年期间在瑞典Västerbotten地区接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者,均通过瑞典结直肠癌登记处进行鉴定。排除了未计划进行治疗性长期新辅助治疗的患者,以及在治疗前因紧急肠道相关问题需要造口的患者。主要观察指标为诊断至手术切除或随访结束的并发症发生率。次要结果是术后30天的并发症、治疗时间(新辅助治疗和手术)和总生存期。采用多变量回归分析,调整年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会健康等级和临床肿瘤分期。结果:在482例确诊患者中,排除后分析105例。其中,22.9%(105人中24人)接受了预处理造口,77.1%(105人中81人)接受了前期新辅助治疗。造口功能缺失组和无造口功能缺失组手术前并发症发生率分别为75.0%(18 / 24)和29.6%(24 / 81)。相当多的并发症是由造口手术直接引起的。造口组患者任何并发症的调整OR为6.71 (95% ci 2.17 - 20.76)。然而,对于切除后30天的并发症,与对照组相比,造口组的调整后无显著OR为2.05 (95% ci . 0.62至6.81)。造口组的新辅助治疗也延迟了(调整后的平均时差:21 (95% ci: 14至27)天),而到切除手术的时间差异不显著。造口组诊断后中位生存期为4.7年,对照组为12.2年(P = 0.015);然而,在多变量分析中进行调整后,估计结果不显著(HR 1.71 (95% ci 0.93至3.14))。结论:在长期新辅助治疗前接受造口术的直肠癌患者,在没有紧急症状的情况下,比没有造口术的患者经历更多的并发症,并且延迟了新辅助治疗的开始。
Stoma versus no stoma prior to long-course neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.
Background: Large bowel obstruction is a possible complication in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer; however, it may be prevented by placing a pretreatment defunctioning stoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate complication rates in patients with rectal cancer undergoing long-course neoadjuvant therapy, comparing those with and without a prophylactic stoma.
Methods: All patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2022 in Region Västerbotten, Sweden, were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients not planned for curative long-course neoadjuvant therapy and those requiring a stoma due to urgent bowel-related issues before treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of complications between diagnosis and resection surgery or end of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were 30-day complications following resection, time to treatment (neoadjuvant therapy and surgery), and overall survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used, with adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade, and clinical tumour stage.
Results: Of 482 identified patients, 105 were analysed after exclusion. Among these, 22.9% (24 of 105) received a pretreatment stoma, whereas 77.1% (81 of 105) received upfront neoadjuvant therapy. The complication incidence before resection in the group with a defunctioning stoma and in the group without a defunctioning stoma was 75.0% (18 of 24) and 29.6% (24 of 81) respectively. A considerable number of complications were directly caused by the stoma surgery. Patients in the stoma group had an adjusted OR of 6.71 (95% c.i. 2.17 to 20.76) for any complication. However, for 30-day complications following resection, an adjusted non-significant OR of 2.05 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 6.81) was documented for the stoma group, in comparison with the control group. Neoadjuvant treatment was also delayed for the stoma group (adjusted mean time difference: 21 (95% c.i. 14 to 27) days), whereas the difference was not significant for the time to resection surgery. The median survival after diagnosis was 4.7 years in the stoma group and 12.2 years in the control group (P = 0.015); however, adjustment in the multivariable analysis rendered the estimate non-significant (HR 1.71 (95% c.i. 0.93 to 3.14)).
Conclusion: Patients with rectal cancer who receive a stoma before long-course neoadjuvant therapy, in the absence of urgent symptoms, experience more complications than those without a stoma and a delay with regard to the start of neoadjuvant treatment.