根据新西兰《精神卫生法》审查精神科医生在非自愿入院中的作用。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Matthew Jenkins, Pablo Richly
{"title":"根据新西兰《精神卫生法》审查精神科医生在非自愿入院中的作用。","authors":"Matthew Jenkins, Pablo Richly","doi":"10.1177/10398562251327036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis perspective examines the role of psychiatrists in section 10 assessments under the Mental Health Act (MHA) in Aotearoa New Zealand, focusing on their involvement, concordance with preliminary assessments, and implications for service delivery. It also explores the potential impact of a capacity-based model.MethodsData was requested from all 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) on section 10 assessments completed between July 2022 and July 2023, including how many resulted in a section 11 certificate. Response rates and concordance between section 8(b) and section 10 assessments were analyzed.ResultsData from six DHBs showed over 95% of section 10 assessments led to a section 11 certificate, demonstrating high concordance. Psychiatrists conducted most section 10 assessments. However, approximately 1 in 20 cases involved non-concordance, suggesting psychiatrist-led assessments serve as a critical safeguard.ConclusionsHigh concordance rates suggest inefficiencies, yet the 1 in 20 non-concordance highlights an important safeguard. Given psychiatrist shortages and after-hours workload, reconsideration of the MHA process is warranted. Possible reforms include streamlining assessments, enabling non-psychiatrist practitioners to conduct final evaluations in some cases, and adopting a capacity-based model to optimize service delivery while maintaining safeguards.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251327036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of psychiatrists in involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act in New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Jenkins, Pablo Richly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10398562251327036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesThis perspective examines the role of psychiatrists in section 10 assessments under the Mental Health Act (MHA) in Aotearoa New Zealand, focusing on their involvement, concordance with preliminary assessments, and implications for service delivery. It also explores the potential impact of a capacity-based model.MethodsData was requested from all 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) on section 10 assessments completed between July 2022 and July 2023, including how many resulted in a section 11 certificate. Response rates and concordance between section 8(b) and section 10 assessments were analyzed.ResultsData from six DHBs showed over 95% of section 10 assessments led to a section 11 certificate, demonstrating high concordance. Psychiatrists conducted most section 10 assessments. However, approximately 1 in 20 cases involved non-concordance, suggesting psychiatrist-led assessments serve as a critical safeguard.ConclusionsHigh concordance rates suggest inefficiencies, yet the 1 in 20 non-concordance highlights an important safeguard. Given psychiatrist shortages and after-hours workload, reconsideration of the MHA process is warranted. Possible reforms include streamlining assessments, enabling non-psychiatrist practitioners to conduct final evaluations in some cases, and adopting a capacity-based model to optimize service delivery while maintaining safeguards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10398562251327036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251327036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251327036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本视角考察了精神科医生在新西兰《精神卫生法》(MHA)第10节评估中的作用,重点关注他们的参与、与初步评估的一致性以及对服务提供的影响。它还探讨了基于能力的模式的潜在影响。方法要求所有20个区卫生委员会(dhb)提供2022年7月至2023年7月期间完成的第10节评估的数据,包括有多少次获得了第11节证书。分析了第8(b)节和第10节评估之间的反应率和一致性。结果来自6个dhb的数据显示,超过95%的第10节评估获得了第11节证书,显示出高度的一致性。精神病医生进行了大部分第10部分的评估。然而,大约1 / 20的病例涉及不一致,这表明精神科医生主导的评估是关键的保障措施。结论高符合率表明效率低下,但1 / 20的不符合率突出了重要的保障措施。鉴于精神科医生短缺和下班后的工作量,重新考虑MHA程序是有保证的。可能的改革包括简化评估,使非精神科医生能够在某些情况下进行最后评估,以及采用基于能力的模式,在保持保障的同时优化服务提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the role of psychiatrists in involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act in New Zealand.

ObjectivesThis perspective examines the role of psychiatrists in section 10 assessments under the Mental Health Act (MHA) in Aotearoa New Zealand, focusing on their involvement, concordance with preliminary assessments, and implications for service delivery. It also explores the potential impact of a capacity-based model.MethodsData was requested from all 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) on section 10 assessments completed between July 2022 and July 2023, including how many resulted in a section 11 certificate. Response rates and concordance between section 8(b) and section 10 assessments were analyzed.ResultsData from six DHBs showed over 95% of section 10 assessments led to a section 11 certificate, demonstrating high concordance. Psychiatrists conducted most section 10 assessments. However, approximately 1 in 20 cases involved non-concordance, suggesting psychiatrist-led assessments serve as a critical safeguard.ConclusionsHigh concordance rates suggest inefficiencies, yet the 1 in 20 non-concordance highlights an important safeguard. Given psychiatrist shortages and after-hours workload, reconsideration of the MHA process is warranted. Possible reforms include streamlining assessments, enabling non-psychiatrist practitioners to conduct final evaluations in some cases, and adopting a capacity-based model to optimize service delivery while maintaining safeguards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信