一期高血压或高血压药物对临界环境限值无影响(PSU HEAT 项目)。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Olivia K Leach, Kat G Fisher, Rachel M Cottle, W Larry Kenney
{"title":"一期高血压或高血压药物对临界环境限值无影响(PSU HEAT 项目)。","authors":"Olivia K Leach, Kat G Fisher, Rachel M Cottle, W Larry Kenney","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Middle-aged and older individuals with hypertension are often considered to be at increased risk during environmental heat waves due to blunted increases in skin blood flow and subsequently elevated core temperatures. Additionally, common antihypertensive medications (i.e., ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and beta blockers) can independently impair heat loss mechanisms, reportedly heightening heat related risk. If these groups are at increased risk, differences should be observed in the environmental conditions in which thermal balance can occur. Identifying critical environmental limits is an integrative method to determine the conditions that separate safe from unsafe heat exposure. Seventy-two participants (F=43) (63±11 yrs; range: 40-92 yrs) were exposed to progressive heat stress at a low metabolic rate. Thirty-seven of the participants were hypertensive (defined by current AHA guidelines for stage 1 hypertension) and 15 participants were taking antihypertensive medications. Experiments were conducted in both hot-dry (HD; up to 53°C, ≤25% rh) and warm-humid (WH; ~35°C, ≥50% rh) environments. One way ANOVA was used to compare normotensives with hypertensive individuals with and without the use of antihypertensive medications in the WH environment. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare differences between hypertensives and normotensives in the HD environment. No differences in critical environmental limits were observed in either environment among all groups (all p>0.05). These data challenge the hypotheses that hypertension increases heat-related risk. Despite potential alterations in heat loss mechanisms due to hypertension and antihypertensive medications, there were not differences in the compensable environmental conditions in individuals with stage 1 hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effect of stage 1 hypertension or hypertensive medication on critical environmental limits (PSU HEAT Project).\",\"authors\":\"Olivia K Leach, Kat G Fisher, Rachel M Cottle, W Larry Kenney\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Middle-aged and older individuals with hypertension are often considered to be at increased risk during environmental heat waves due to blunted increases in skin blood flow and subsequently elevated core temperatures. Additionally, common antihypertensive medications (i.e., ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and beta blockers) can independently impair heat loss mechanisms, reportedly heightening heat related risk. If these groups are at increased risk, differences should be observed in the environmental conditions in which thermal balance can occur. Identifying critical environmental limits is an integrative method to determine the conditions that separate safe from unsafe heat exposure. Seventy-two participants (F=43) (63±11 yrs; range: 40-92 yrs) were exposed to progressive heat stress at a low metabolic rate. Thirty-seven of the participants were hypertensive (defined by current AHA guidelines for stage 1 hypertension) and 15 participants were taking antihypertensive medications. Experiments were conducted in both hot-dry (HD; up to 53°C, ≤25% rh) and warm-humid (WH; ~35°C, ≥50% rh) environments. One way ANOVA was used to compare normotensives with hypertensive individuals with and without the use of antihypertensive medications in the WH environment. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare differences between hypertensives and normotensives in the HD environment. No differences in critical environmental limits were observed in either environment among all groups (all p>0.05). These data challenge the hypotheses that hypertension increases heat-related risk. Despite potential alterations in heat loss mechanisms due to hypertension and antihypertensive medications, there were not differences in the compensable environmental conditions in individuals with stage 1 hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中老年高血压患者通常被认为在环境热浪中风险增加,因为皮肤血流量增加钝化,随后核心温度升高。此外,常见的降压药物(如ACE抑制剂、利尿剂和受体阻滞剂)可单独损害热损失机制,据报道会增加热相关风险。如果这些群体的风险增加,则应观察可能发生热平衡的环境条件的差异。确定临界环境极限是确定安全与不安全热暴露分离条件的综合方法。72名受试者(F=43)(63±11岁;范围:40-92岁)以低代谢率暴露于进行性热应激。37名参与者患有高血压(根据目前美国心脏协会指南对1期高血压的定义),15名参与者正在服用抗高血压药物。实验在热干(HD);高达53°C,≤25% rh)和温湿(WH;~35℃,≥50% rh)环境。采用单因素方差分析比较在WH环境中使用和不使用降压药的血压正常者和高血压个体。未配对t检验用于比较高血压患者和正常高血压患者在HD环境中的差异。各组间临界环境极限均无差异(p < 0.05)。这些数据挑战了高血压增加热相关风险的假设。尽管高血压和降压药物可能改变热损失机制,但在1期高血压患者的可补偿环境条件方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No effect of stage 1 hypertension or hypertensive medication on critical environmental limits (PSU HEAT Project).

Middle-aged and older individuals with hypertension are often considered to be at increased risk during environmental heat waves due to blunted increases in skin blood flow and subsequently elevated core temperatures. Additionally, common antihypertensive medications (i.e., ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and beta blockers) can independently impair heat loss mechanisms, reportedly heightening heat related risk. If these groups are at increased risk, differences should be observed in the environmental conditions in which thermal balance can occur. Identifying critical environmental limits is an integrative method to determine the conditions that separate safe from unsafe heat exposure. Seventy-two participants (F=43) (63±11 yrs; range: 40-92 yrs) were exposed to progressive heat stress at a low metabolic rate. Thirty-seven of the participants were hypertensive (defined by current AHA guidelines for stage 1 hypertension) and 15 participants were taking antihypertensive medications. Experiments were conducted in both hot-dry (HD; up to 53°C, ≤25% rh) and warm-humid (WH; ~35°C, ≥50% rh) environments. One way ANOVA was used to compare normotensives with hypertensive individuals with and without the use of antihypertensive medications in the WH environment. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare differences between hypertensives and normotensives in the HD environment. No differences in critical environmental limits were observed in either environment among all groups (all p>0.05). These data challenge the hypotheses that hypertension increases heat-related risk. Despite potential alterations in heat loss mechanisms due to hypertension and antihypertensive medications, there were not differences in the compensable environmental conditions in individuals with stage 1 hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信