Ítalo Tamburrino , Mary T.K. Arroyo , Paola Jara-Arancio
{"title":"在竞争的宏观生态假说的光照下,智利安第斯山脉中部树线以上的系统发育多样性和结构","authors":"Ítalo Tamburrino , Mary T.K. Arroyo , Paola Jara-Arancio","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The “Tropical Niche Conservatism” (TNC) and “Out of the Tropics” (OTT) hypotheses were developed originally in relation to latitudinal species richness gradient. To determine whether the predictions of these theories play out across elevational gradients in the central Chilean Andes, we determined species richness (SR), Relative Phylogenetic Diversity (PD<sub>SES</sub>), Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD<sub>SES</sub>) and Mean Nearest Taxon Distance (MNTD<sub>SES</sub>) at 100 m elevational intervals for five plot sizes over two above tree line gradients embedded in the same regional flora. We assessed the effect of phylogenetic resolution using two species-level phylogenies resolved to different degrees. After an initial gradual increase followed by a gradual decline, both SR and PD decreased with elevation. MNTD<sub>SES</sub> transitioned from phylogenetic overdispersion in the subalpine to clustering in the upper alpine with unclear elevational trends at the smaller spatial scales. Results for MPD<sub>SES</sub> were equivocal. Although results for the two phylogenies were closely correlated, lower phylogenetic resolution favored decreased site-level PD at all spatial scales and a trend in the direction of phylogenetic overdispersion for PD<sub>SES</sub> and MNTD<sub>SES</sub> at the smaller spatial scales. Overall, TNC provides a more coherent explanation for our results in the Chilean Andes than OTT. Lower SR and lack of phylogenetic clustering at lower elevations on the two gradients are attributed to contingencies of the Miocene uplift of the Andes leading to a more arid climate and depressed treeline. Spatial scaling effects call for well resolved species-level phylogenies in studies seeking to relate phylogenetic structure to local ecological effects. However, the degree of phylogenetic resolution becomes less critical when the focus is on broad macroecological trends.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article e03537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic diversity and structure above the tree line in the central Chilean Andes in the light of competing macroecological hypotheses\",\"authors\":\"Ítalo Tamburrino , Mary T.K. Arroyo , Paola Jara-Arancio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The “Tropical Niche Conservatism” (TNC) and “Out of the Tropics” (OTT) hypotheses were developed originally in relation to latitudinal species richness gradient. To determine whether the predictions of these theories play out across elevational gradients in the central Chilean Andes, we determined species richness (SR), Relative Phylogenetic Diversity (PD<sub>SES</sub>), Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD<sub>SES</sub>) and Mean Nearest Taxon Distance (MNTD<sub>SES</sub>) at 100 m elevational intervals for five plot sizes over two above tree line gradients embedded in the same regional flora. We assessed the effect of phylogenetic resolution using two species-level phylogenies resolved to different degrees. After an initial gradual increase followed by a gradual decline, both SR and PD decreased with elevation. MNTD<sub>SES</sub> transitioned from phylogenetic overdispersion in the subalpine to clustering in the upper alpine with unclear elevational trends at the smaller spatial scales. Results for MPD<sub>SES</sub> were equivocal. Although results for the two phylogenies were closely correlated, lower phylogenetic resolution favored decreased site-level PD at all spatial scales and a trend in the direction of phylogenetic overdispersion for PD<sub>SES</sub> and MNTD<sub>SES</sub> at the smaller spatial scales. Overall, TNC provides a more coherent explanation for our results in the Chilean Andes than OTT. Lower SR and lack of phylogenetic clustering at lower elevations on the two gradients are attributed to contingencies of the Miocene uplift of the Andes leading to a more arid climate and depressed treeline. Spatial scaling effects call for well resolved species-level phylogenies in studies seeking to relate phylogenetic structure to local ecological effects. However, the degree of phylogenetic resolution becomes less critical when the focus is on broad macroecological trends.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001386\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phylogenetic diversity and structure above the tree line in the central Chilean Andes in the light of competing macroecological hypotheses
The “Tropical Niche Conservatism” (TNC) and “Out of the Tropics” (OTT) hypotheses were developed originally in relation to latitudinal species richness gradient. To determine whether the predictions of these theories play out across elevational gradients in the central Chilean Andes, we determined species richness (SR), Relative Phylogenetic Diversity (PDSES), Mean Pairwise Distance (MPDSES) and Mean Nearest Taxon Distance (MNTDSES) at 100 m elevational intervals for five plot sizes over two above tree line gradients embedded in the same regional flora. We assessed the effect of phylogenetic resolution using two species-level phylogenies resolved to different degrees. After an initial gradual increase followed by a gradual decline, both SR and PD decreased with elevation. MNTDSES transitioned from phylogenetic overdispersion in the subalpine to clustering in the upper alpine with unclear elevational trends at the smaller spatial scales. Results for MPDSES were equivocal. Although results for the two phylogenies were closely correlated, lower phylogenetic resolution favored decreased site-level PD at all spatial scales and a trend in the direction of phylogenetic overdispersion for PDSES and MNTDSES at the smaller spatial scales. Overall, TNC provides a more coherent explanation for our results in the Chilean Andes than OTT. Lower SR and lack of phylogenetic clustering at lower elevations on the two gradients are attributed to contingencies of the Miocene uplift of the Andes leading to a more arid climate and depressed treeline. Spatial scaling effects call for well resolved species-level phylogenies in studies seeking to relate phylogenetic structure to local ecological effects. However, the degree of phylogenetic resolution becomes less critical when the focus is on broad macroecological trends.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.