匹马万色林对帕金森病处方实践的影响

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen , Vy Le , Daniel Weintraub , Allison W. Willis
{"title":"匹马万色林对帕金森病处方实践的影响","authors":"Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen ,&nbsp;Vy Le ,&nbsp;Daniel Weintraub ,&nbsp;Allison W. Willis","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP) is a common complication of PD. Until 2016, the only drugs available to treat PDP in the U.S. were antipsychotics with variable degrees of dopamine-receptor antagonism (DRA) that may worsen PD motor symptoms. We evaluated the impact that pimavanserin, a selective serotonin receptor inverse agonist/antagonist atypical antipsychotic (AAP) with no known DRA, had on PDP treatment practices in a commercially insured population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included adults diagnosed with PD who filled at least one AAP prescription from 2016 to 2022. AAP dispensings were categorized into (1) pimavanserin, (2) clozapine and quetiapine (i.e., PDP-“preferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs), and (3) the remaining AAPs (i.e., PDP-“nonpreferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs). Trends in quarterly dispensing rates per 1000 persons treated were compared across categories. Secondary analyses focused on the 65+ subpopulations insured by Medicare Advantage programs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dispensing rates varied between 4 and 697/1000 persons treated for pimavanserin, 1434–1821 for preferred, and 394–746 for nonpreferred AAPs. Pimavanserin dispensings surpassed the nonpreferred category after quarter 3 of 2018. However, preferred AAPs, particularly quetiapine, remained the most dispensed category in the sixth year after pimavanserin’s approval. We observed similar trends among Medicare Advantage enrollees.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The availability of pimavanserin was followed by a decline in the use of the most harmful AAPs in persons living with PD. Quetiapine remained the most prescribed AAP. Comparative safety and effectiveness studies are needed to define the relative risks and benefits of treatment options in PDP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pimavanserin on prescribing practices in parkinson disease\",\"authors\":\"Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen ,&nbsp;Vy Le ,&nbsp;Daniel Weintraub ,&nbsp;Allison W. Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP) is a common complication of PD. Until 2016, the only drugs available to treat PDP in the U.S. were antipsychotics with variable degrees of dopamine-receptor antagonism (DRA) that may worsen PD motor symptoms. We evaluated the impact that pimavanserin, a selective serotonin receptor inverse agonist/antagonist atypical antipsychotic (AAP) with no known DRA, had on PDP treatment practices in a commercially insured population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included adults diagnosed with PD who filled at least one AAP prescription from 2016 to 2022. AAP dispensings were categorized into (1) pimavanserin, (2) clozapine and quetiapine (i.e., PDP-“preferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs), and (3) the remaining AAPs (i.e., PDP-“nonpreferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs). Trends in quarterly dispensing rates per 1000 persons treated were compared across categories. Secondary analyses focused on the 65+ subpopulations insured by Medicare Advantage programs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dispensing rates varied between 4 and 697/1000 persons treated for pimavanserin, 1434–1821 for preferred, and 394–746 for nonpreferred AAPs. Pimavanserin dispensings surpassed the nonpreferred category after quarter 3 of 2018. However, preferred AAPs, particularly quetiapine, remained the most dispensed category in the sixth year after pimavanserin’s approval. We observed similar trends among Medicare Advantage enrollees.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The availability of pimavanserin was followed by a decline in the use of the most harmful AAPs in persons living with PD. Quetiapine remained the most prescribed AAP. Comparative safety and effectiveness studies are needed to define the relative risks and benefits of treatment options in PDP.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帕金森病精神病(PDP)是帕金森病的常见并发症。直到2016年,美国唯一可用于治疗PDP的药物是具有不同程度多巴胺受体拮抗剂(DRA)的抗精神病药,可能会加重PD运动症状。我们评估了匹马万色林(一种没有已知DRA的选择性5 -羟色胺受体反向激动剂/拮抗剂非典型抗精神病药(AAP))对商业保险人群PDP治疗实践的影响。方法:我们纳入了2016年至2022年期间至少服用过一种AAP处方的PD患者。AAP分配分为(1)匹马万色林,(2)氯氮平和喹硫平(即PDP-“首选”混合受体拮抗剂AAPs),以及(3)剩余的AAPs(即PDP-“非首选”混合受体拮抗剂AAPs)。比较了不同类别每1000人的季度配药率的趋势。二级分析集中在65岁以上的医疗保险优势计划保险人群。结果:匹马万塞林的配药率在4 - 697/1000人之间,首选aap为1434-1821人,非首选aap为394-746人。2018年第三季度之后,皮马万色林超过了非首选类别。然而,在匹马万色林获批后的第六年,首选的aap,尤其是喹硫平,仍然是最畅销的类别。我们在医疗保险优势参保者中观察到类似的趋势。结论随着匹马万色林的普及,PD患者中最有害的AAPs的使用也随之下降。奎硫平仍然是最常用的AAP。需要进行安全性和有效性比较研究,以确定PDP治疗方案的相对风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pimavanserin on prescribing practices in parkinson disease

Introduction

Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP) is a common complication of PD. Until 2016, the only drugs available to treat PDP in the U.S. were antipsychotics with variable degrees of dopamine-receptor antagonism (DRA) that may worsen PD motor symptoms. We evaluated the impact that pimavanserin, a selective serotonin receptor inverse agonist/antagonist atypical antipsychotic (AAP) with no known DRA, had on PDP treatment practices in a commercially insured population.

Methods

We included adults diagnosed with PD who filled at least one AAP prescription from 2016 to 2022. AAP dispensings were categorized into (1) pimavanserin, (2) clozapine and quetiapine (i.e., PDP-“preferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs), and (3) the remaining AAPs (i.e., PDP-“nonpreferred” mixed receptor antagonist AAPs). Trends in quarterly dispensing rates per 1000 persons treated were compared across categories. Secondary analyses focused on the 65+ subpopulations insured by Medicare Advantage programs.

Results

Dispensing rates varied between 4 and 697/1000 persons treated for pimavanserin, 1434–1821 for preferred, and 394–746 for nonpreferred AAPs. Pimavanserin dispensings surpassed the nonpreferred category after quarter 3 of 2018. However, preferred AAPs, particularly quetiapine, remained the most dispensed category in the sixth year after pimavanserin’s approval. We observed similar trends among Medicare Advantage enrollees.

Conclusion

The availability of pimavanserin was followed by a decline in the use of the most harmful AAPs in persons living with PD. Quetiapine remained the most prescribed AAP. Comparative safety and effectiveness studies are needed to define the relative risks and benefits of treatment options in PDP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信