Yuan Xu, Ningning Lu, Qiao Li, Kuo Men, Xinming Zhao, Jianrong Dai
{"title":"利用MR-Linac为在线自适应超高分次前列腺癌放疗制定基于诊断图像的治疗计划。","authors":"Yuan Xu, Ningning Lu, Qiao Li, Kuo Men, Xinming Zhao, Jianrong Dai","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A new workflow was investigated for Elekta Unity MR-Linac by removing the computed tomography (CT)-simulation step and using diagnostic CT (DCT) for reference plan generation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer treated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were recontoured on DCT, and Hounsfield unit conversions to relative electron density were calibrated for DCT. Reference plans were reoptimized and recalculated using DCT for Unity. Subsequent adaptive plans were designed through an adapt-to-shape workflow to edit targets and OARs via daily MRI to generate a new treatment plan. Bulk electron density information for Unity adaptive plan was compared between planning CT (PCT) and DCT for volumes of interest. Dosimetric parameters were evaluated between PCT- and DCT-based reference and adaptive plans for target coverage and OAR dose constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bulk relative electron density differences between PCT and DCT were within ±1% for targets and OARs, excepting the rectum. PCT and DCT-based reference plans did not significantly differ in mean target coverages or for OARs in dosimetric difference except for V<sub>36 Gy</sub> of the rectum. PCT- and DCT-based adaptive plans did not significantly differ for most dosimetric parameters of targets and OARs except for V<sub>29 Gy</sub> and V<sub>36 Gy</sub> of the rectum, V<sub>18.1 Gy</sub> of the bladder, and D<sub>50%</sub> of the urethra.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By removing the CT simulation step, it is feasible to use DCT for designing reference and adaptive plans in the Unity ATS workflow. The workflow increased adaptive radiotherapy efficiency and decreased patient waiting time and additional radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic image-based treatment planning for online adaptive ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer radiotherapy with MR-Linac.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Xu, Ningning Lu, Qiao Li, Kuo Men, Xinming Zhao, Jianrong Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A new workflow was investigated for Elekta Unity MR-Linac by removing the computed tomography (CT)-simulation step and using diagnostic CT (DCT) for reference plan generation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer treated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were recontoured on DCT, and Hounsfield unit conversions to relative electron density were calibrated for DCT. Reference plans were reoptimized and recalculated using DCT for Unity. Subsequent adaptive plans were designed through an adapt-to-shape workflow to edit targets and OARs via daily MRI to generate a new treatment plan. Bulk electron density information for Unity adaptive plan was compared between planning CT (PCT) and DCT for volumes of interest. Dosimetric parameters were evaluated between PCT- and DCT-based reference and adaptive plans for target coverage and OAR dose constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bulk relative electron density differences between PCT and DCT were within ±1% for targets and OARs, excepting the rectum. PCT and DCT-based reference plans did not significantly differ in mean target coverages or for OARs in dosimetric difference except for V<sub>36 Gy</sub> of the rectum. PCT- and DCT-based adaptive plans did not significantly differ for most dosimetric parameters of targets and OARs except for V<sub>29 Gy</sub> and V<sub>36 Gy</sub> of the rectum, V<sub>18.1 Gy</sub> of the bladder, and D<sub>50%</sub> of the urethra.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By removing the CT simulation step, it is feasible to use DCT for designing reference and adaptive plans in the Unity ATS workflow. The workflow increased adaptive radiotherapy efficiency and decreased patient waiting time and additional radiation dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic image-based treatment planning for online adaptive ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer radiotherapy with MR-Linac.
Purpose: A new workflow was investigated for Elekta Unity MR-Linac by removing the computed tomography (CT)-simulation step and using diagnostic CT (DCT) for reference plan generation.
Materials and methods: Ten patients with ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer treated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were recontoured on DCT, and Hounsfield unit conversions to relative electron density were calibrated for DCT. Reference plans were reoptimized and recalculated using DCT for Unity. Subsequent adaptive plans were designed through an adapt-to-shape workflow to edit targets and OARs via daily MRI to generate a new treatment plan. Bulk electron density information for Unity adaptive plan was compared between planning CT (PCT) and DCT for volumes of interest. Dosimetric parameters were evaluated between PCT- and DCT-based reference and adaptive plans for target coverage and OAR dose constraints.
Results: Bulk relative electron density differences between PCT and DCT were within ±1% for targets and OARs, excepting the rectum. PCT and DCT-based reference plans did not significantly differ in mean target coverages or for OARs in dosimetric difference except for V36 Gy of the rectum. PCT- and DCT-based adaptive plans did not significantly differ for most dosimetric parameters of targets and OARs except for V29 Gy and V36 Gy of the rectum, V18.1 Gy of the bladder, and D50% of the urethra.
Conclusions: By removing the CT simulation step, it is feasible to use DCT for designing reference and adaptive plans in the Unity ATS workflow. The workflow increased adaptive radiotherapy efficiency and decreased patient waiting time and additional radiation dose.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic