镰状细胞病患者使用或不使用羟基脲治疗 Crizanlizumab(STAND):安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、3 期试验的主要分析结果。

IF 15.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Lancet Haematology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3
Miguel R Abboud, Rodolfo D Cançado, Mariane De Montalembert, Wally R Smith, Hala Rimawi, Ersi Voskaridou, Birol Güvenç, Kenneth I Ataga, Deborah Keefe, Kai Grosch, Jimmy Watson, Evgeniya Reshetnyak, Michele L Nassin, Yvonne Dei-Adomakoh
{"title":"镰状细胞病患者使用或不使用羟基脲治疗 Crizanlizumab(STAND):安慰剂对照、随机、双盲、3 期试验的主要分析结果。","authors":"Miguel R Abboud, Rodolfo D Cançado, Mariane De Montalembert, Wally R Smith, Hala Rimawi, Ersi Voskaridou, Birol Güvenç, Kenneth I Ataga, Deborah Keefe, Kai Grosch, Jimmy Watson, Evgeniya Reshetnyak, Michele L Nassin, Yvonne Dei-Adomakoh","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crizanlizumab has previously shown efficacy as a potent disease-modifying therapy for alleviating vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease. The SUSTAIN study showed a reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in patients treated with 5 mg/kg crizanlizumab, compared with placebo. The STAND study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses (5·0 mg/kg and 7·5 mg/kg) of crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease. Herein, we report the primary analysis results of STAND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STAND is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study of patients with sickle cell disease aged 12 years and older done at 65 sites in 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 5·0 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, 7·5 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, or placebo, in addition to standard of care, for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises leading to a health-care visit over the first-year post-randomisation. The secondary objectives included assessing crizanlizumab's safety. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03814746) and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between July 26, 2019, and Aug 31, 2022, 252 patients were enrolled and treated. The primary analysis showed an adjusted annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises of 2·49 (95% CI 1·90-3·26) in the crizanlizumab 5·0 mg/kg group, 2·04 (1·56-2·65) in the 7·5 mg/kg group, and 2·30 (1·75-3·01) in the placebo group. Ratios of adjusted annualised rates of vaso-occlusive crises leading to health-care visits were 1·08 (95% CI 0·76-1·55, p>0·999) for 5·0 mg/kg and 0·89 (0·62-1·27, p>0·999) for 7·5 mg/kg vs placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed less frequently in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (27 [32%] of 85 and 32 [39%] of 83, respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (47 [56%] of 84). Serious adverse events (all grades) were also less frequent in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (26 [31%] and 22 [27%], respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (35 [42%]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The STAND study supports the safety and tolerability of crizanlizumab in the treatment of sickle cell disease. The primary analysis showed no significant difference in efficacy between crizanlizumab and placebo. Factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, global enrolment with varied patterns of health-care use and vaso-occlusive crisis management as well as the commercial availability of crizanlizumab might have influenced these results. The safety profile of crizanlizumab was consistent with that in previous reports, without new safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novartis Pharmaceuticals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48726,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Haematology","volume":" ","pages":"e248-e257"},"PeriodicalIF":15.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crizanlizumab with or without hydroxyurea in patients with sickle cell disease (STAND): primary analyses from a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel R Abboud, Rodolfo D Cançado, Mariane De Montalembert, Wally R Smith, Hala Rimawi, Ersi Voskaridou, Birol Güvenç, Kenneth I Ataga, Deborah Keefe, Kai Grosch, Jimmy Watson, Evgeniya Reshetnyak, Michele L Nassin, Yvonne Dei-Adomakoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crizanlizumab has previously shown efficacy as a potent disease-modifying therapy for alleviating vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease. The SUSTAIN study showed a reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in patients treated with 5 mg/kg crizanlizumab, compared with placebo. The STAND study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses (5·0 mg/kg and 7·5 mg/kg) of crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease. Herein, we report the primary analysis results of STAND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STAND is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study of patients with sickle cell disease aged 12 years and older done at 65 sites in 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 5·0 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, 7·5 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, or placebo, in addition to standard of care, for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises leading to a health-care visit over the first-year post-randomisation. The secondary objectives included assessing crizanlizumab's safety. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03814746) and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between July 26, 2019, and Aug 31, 2022, 252 patients were enrolled and treated. The primary analysis showed an adjusted annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises of 2·49 (95% CI 1·90-3·26) in the crizanlizumab 5·0 mg/kg group, 2·04 (1·56-2·65) in the 7·5 mg/kg group, and 2·30 (1·75-3·01) in the placebo group. Ratios of adjusted annualised rates of vaso-occlusive crises leading to health-care visits were 1·08 (95% CI 0·76-1·55, p>0·999) for 5·0 mg/kg and 0·89 (0·62-1·27, p>0·999) for 7·5 mg/kg vs placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed less frequently in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (27 [32%] of 85 and 32 [39%] of 83, respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (47 [56%] of 84). Serious adverse events (all grades) were also less frequent in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (26 [31%] and 22 [27%], respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (35 [42%]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The STAND study supports the safety and tolerability of crizanlizumab in the treatment of sickle cell disease. The primary analysis showed no significant difference in efficacy between crizanlizumab and placebo. Factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, global enrolment with varied patterns of health-care use and vaso-occlusive crisis management as well as the commercial availability of crizanlizumab might have influenced these results. The safety profile of crizanlizumab was consistent with that in previous reports, without new safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novartis Pharmaceuticals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e248-e257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00384-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Crizanlizumab先前已显示出作为缓解镰状细胞病血管闭塞危象的有效疾病修饰疗法的疗效。SUSTAIN研究显示,与安慰剂相比,接受5mg /kg克里赞利单抗治疗的患者血管闭塞危像减少。STAND研究旨在评估两种剂量(5.0 mg/kg和7.5 mg/kg)的crizanlizumab治疗镰状细胞病的疗效和安全性。在此,我们报告STAND的初步分析结果。STAND是一项3期、多中心、随机、双盲研究,在21个国家的65个地点对12岁及以上的镰状细胞病患者进行研究。在标准治疗的基础上,患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受5.0 mg/kg、7.5 mg/kg克里赞利单抗或安慰剂治疗,为期1年。主要终点是随机化后一年内导致就诊的血管闭塞危机的年化率。次要目标包括评估crizanlizumab的安全性。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03814746),并正在进行中。研究结果:在2019年7月26日至2022年8月31日期间,252名患者入组并接受治疗。初步分析显示,在crizzanlizumab为5.0 mg/kg组中,血管闭塞危像的调整年化率为2.49 (95% CI为1.90 - 3.26),在7.5 mg/kg组中为2.04(1.56 - 2.65),在安慰剂组中为2.30(1.75 - 3.01)。与安慰剂相比,5.5 mg/kg组血管闭塞危像导致就诊的调整年化比率为1.08 (95% CI 0.76 - 1.55, p> 0.999), 7.5 mg/kg组为0.89 (95% CI 0.62 - 1.27, p> 0.999)。各治疗组的不良事件发生率相似。在安慰剂组和克里赞单抗7.5 mg/kg组(85例中27例[32%]和83例中32例[39%])中观察到的3级或以上不良事件发生率低于5.0 mg/kg组(84例中47例[56%])。安慰剂组和克里赞单抗7.5 mg/kg组的严重不良事件(所有级别)发生率(分别为26例[31%]和22例[27%])也低于5.0 mg/kg组(35例[42%])。解释:STAND研究支持crizanlizumab治疗镰状细胞病的安全性和耐受性。初步分析显示,克里赞单抗与安慰剂的疗效无显著差异。包括COVID-19大流行、医疗保健使用模式不同的全球登记和血管闭塞危机管理以及克里赞利单抗的商业可用性在内的因素可能影响了这些结果。crizanlizumab的安全性与之前的报告一致,没有新的安全性问题。资金来源:诺华制药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crizanlizumab with or without hydroxyurea in patients with sickle cell disease (STAND): primary analyses from a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Background: Crizanlizumab has previously shown efficacy as a potent disease-modifying therapy for alleviating vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease. The SUSTAIN study showed a reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in patients treated with 5 mg/kg crizanlizumab, compared with placebo. The STAND study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses (5·0 mg/kg and 7·5 mg/kg) of crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease. Herein, we report the primary analysis results of STAND.

Methods: STAND is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study of patients with sickle cell disease aged 12 years and older done at 65 sites in 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 5·0 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, 7·5 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, or placebo, in addition to standard of care, for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises leading to a health-care visit over the first-year post-randomisation. The secondary objectives included assessing crizanlizumab's safety. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03814746) and is ongoing.

Findings: Between July 26, 2019, and Aug 31, 2022, 252 patients were enrolled and treated. The primary analysis showed an adjusted annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises of 2·49 (95% CI 1·90-3·26) in the crizanlizumab 5·0 mg/kg group, 2·04 (1·56-2·65) in the 7·5 mg/kg group, and 2·30 (1·75-3·01) in the placebo group. Ratios of adjusted annualised rates of vaso-occlusive crises leading to health-care visits were 1·08 (95% CI 0·76-1·55, p>0·999) for 5·0 mg/kg and 0·89 (0·62-1·27, p>0·999) for 7·5 mg/kg vs placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed less frequently in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (27 [32%] of 85 and 32 [39%] of 83, respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (47 [56%] of 84). Serious adverse events (all grades) were also less frequent in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (26 [31%] and 22 [27%], respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (35 [42%]).

Interpretation: The STAND study supports the safety and tolerability of crizanlizumab in the treatment of sickle cell disease. The primary analysis showed no significant difference in efficacy between crizanlizumab and placebo. Factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, global enrolment with varied patterns of health-care use and vaso-occlusive crisis management as well as the commercial availability of crizanlizumab might have influenced these results. The safety profile of crizanlizumab was consistent with that in previous reports, without new safety concerns.

Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Haematology
Lancet Haematology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
323
期刊介绍: Launched in autumn 2014, The Lancet Haematology is part of the Lancet specialty journals, exclusively available online. This monthly journal is committed to publishing original research that not only sheds light on haematological clinical practice but also advocates for change within the field. Aligned with the Lancet journals' tradition of high-impact research, The Lancet Haematology aspires to achieve a similar standing and reputation within its discipline. It upholds the rigorous reporting standards characteristic of all Lancet titles, ensuring a consistent commitment to quality in its contributions to the field of haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信