日间肛肠手术患者围手术期健康教育:循证实践改变

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Weige Sun, Fei Wu, Aman Li, Wenshuang Wang, Jie Luo, Huajun Zhang, Ran Zhang, Weixin Cai
{"title":"日间肛肠手术患者围手术期健康教育:循证实践改变","authors":"Weige Sun, Fei Wu, Aman Li, Wenshuang Wang, Jie Luo, Huajun Zhang, Ran Zhang, Weixin Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and implement an evidence-based perioperative health education program for patients undergoing daytime anorectal surgery, and to enhance patients' knowledge scores pertaining to anorectal diseases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An evidence-based quality improvement project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to the evidence-based practice model of the Joanna Briggs Institute, we developed 17 audit criteria grounded in the best available evidence. This evidence-based practice was subsequently applied to patients scheduled for daytime anorectal surgery between March 2023 and May 2024. The project progressed through three distinct phases: a baseline audit, implementation of practice changes, and a post evidence application audit. Specifically, we compared the execution rates of the audit criteria by the nursing staff, patients' scores on anorectal disease knowledge, patient satisfaction, and incidence of postoperative complications before and after implementation of the evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After implementation of the evidence-based practice, there was a statistically significant difference in the execution rates of audit indicators 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 10 to 17 (P < .05). After implementation, patients' average score on anorectal disease knowledge was 74.14 ± 14.40, higher than the average baseline audit phase score of 63.67 ± 12.31 (P = .004). Patients were likely to recommend the hospital's daytime anorectal surgery to others (P = .036). There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction scores or complication incidence between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests that the program may regulate nurse behavior, enhance patients' health knowledge, and improve patients' overall medical experience. Continuous quality supervision and audit should be further conducted in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Health Education for Patients With Daytime Anorectal Surgery: An Evidence-based Practice Change.\",\"authors\":\"Weige Sun, Fei Wu, Aman Li, Wenshuang Wang, Jie Luo, Huajun Zhang, Ran Zhang, Weixin Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and implement an evidence-based perioperative health education program for patients undergoing daytime anorectal surgery, and to enhance patients' knowledge scores pertaining to anorectal diseases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An evidence-based quality improvement project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to the evidence-based practice model of the Joanna Briggs Institute, we developed 17 audit criteria grounded in the best available evidence. This evidence-based practice was subsequently applied to patients scheduled for daytime anorectal surgery between March 2023 and May 2024. The project progressed through three distinct phases: a baseline audit, implementation of practice changes, and a post evidence application audit. Specifically, we compared the execution rates of the audit criteria by the nursing staff, patients' scores on anorectal disease knowledge, patient satisfaction, and incidence of postoperative complications before and after implementation of the evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After implementation of the evidence-based practice, there was a statistically significant difference in the execution rates of audit indicators 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 10 to 17 (P < .05). After implementation, patients' average score on anorectal disease knowledge was 74.14 ± 14.40, higher than the average baseline audit phase score of 63.67 ± 12.31 (P = .004). Patients were likely to recommend the hospital's daytime anorectal surgery to others (P = .036). There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction scores or complication incidence between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests that the program may regulate nurse behavior, enhance patients' health knowledge, and improve patients' overall medical experience. Continuous quality supervision and audit should be further conducted in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:制定并实施以证据为基础的日间肛肠手术患者围手术期健康教育方案,提高患者对肛肠疾病的知识得分。设计:基于证据的质量改进项目。方法:遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的循证实践模型,我们基于现有的最佳证据制定了17项审计标准。这种循证实践随后应用于2023年3月至2024年5月期间计划进行日间肛肠手术的患者。项目通过三个不同的阶段进行:基线审计、实践变更的实施和事后证据应用审计。具体而言,我们比较了实施循证实践前后护理人员对审计标准的执行率、患者对肛肠疾病知识的得分、患者满意度和术后并发症的发生率。结果:循证实践实施后,审计指标1、2、5、6、8、10 ~ 17的执行率差异有统计学意义(P)。结论:现有证据表明,循证实践可规范护士行为,增强患者健康知识,改善患者整体医疗体验。今后应进一步进行持续的质量监督和审核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative Health Education for Patients With Daytime Anorectal Surgery: An Evidence-based Practice Change.

Purpose: To develop and implement an evidence-based perioperative health education program for patients undergoing daytime anorectal surgery, and to enhance patients' knowledge scores pertaining to anorectal diseases.

Design: An evidence-based quality improvement project.

Methods: Adhering to the evidence-based practice model of the Joanna Briggs Institute, we developed 17 audit criteria grounded in the best available evidence. This evidence-based practice was subsequently applied to patients scheduled for daytime anorectal surgery between March 2023 and May 2024. The project progressed through three distinct phases: a baseline audit, implementation of practice changes, and a post evidence application audit. Specifically, we compared the execution rates of the audit criteria by the nursing staff, patients' scores on anorectal disease knowledge, patient satisfaction, and incidence of postoperative complications before and after implementation of the evidence-based practice.

Findings: After implementation of the evidence-based practice, there was a statistically significant difference in the execution rates of audit indicators 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 10 to 17 (P < .05). After implementation, patients' average score on anorectal disease knowledge was 74.14 ± 14.40, higher than the average baseline audit phase score of 63.67 ± 12.31 (P = .004). Patients were likely to recommend the hospital's daytime anorectal surgery to others (P = .036). There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction scores or complication incidence between the two groups.

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that the program may regulate nurse behavior, enhance patients' health knowledge, and improve patients' overall medical experience. Continuous quality supervision and audit should be further conducted in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信