姑息医学中的超说明书用药:德尔菲研究对循证治疗建议的共识。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1177/02692163251323123
Stefanie Pügge, Aleksandra Dukic-Ott, Julian Baumgärtel, Saskia Jünger, Claudia Bausewein, Constanze Rémi
{"title":"姑息医学中的超说明书用药:德尔菲研究对循证治疗建议的共识。","authors":"Stefanie Pügge, Aleksandra Dukic-Ott, Julian Baumgärtel, Saskia Jünger, Claudia Bausewein, Constanze Rémi","doi":"10.1177/02692163251323123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Off-label use of drugs is an integral part of everyday clinical practice in palliative medicine. However, it is associated with many uncertainties, that is, drug therapy safety or legal issues including cost coverage. Healthcare professionals often lack time and resources for comprehensive literature search and patient-specific risk-benefit analyses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this project is to develop, evaluate and rate agreement/disagreement on treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online Delphi study with two rounds each to rate agreement/disagreement with treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine. An international expert panel consisting of physicians, pharmacists and nurses working in palliative care evaluated previously developed recommendations based on the best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>/participants:Professionals (physicians, pharmacists, nursing staff) working in inpatient and home palliative care involved in the medication process were recruited as experts to participate. Between 64 and 75 experts participated in the first two Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64/68 recommendations on 21 drugs and 14 applications were agreed upon. Topics related to routes of administration as well as indications for sialorrhea, bronchorrhea, xerostomia, pruritus, singultus, fistula, gastroparesis and hot flashes. Recommendations that reached consensus are available to health care professionals via a free of charge database.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For many off-label use applications, it is likely that there will be no registration studies and therefore no drug approvals in the future. The consensus-based recommendations are intended to facilitate individual treatment planning for prescribers and to enable a more reflected handling of off-label use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"530-542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-label drug use in palliative medicine: Delphi study for the consensus of evidence-based treatment recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Pügge, Aleksandra Dukic-Ott, Julian Baumgärtel, Saskia Jünger, Claudia Bausewein, Constanze Rémi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163251323123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Off-label use of drugs is an integral part of everyday clinical practice in palliative medicine. However, it is associated with many uncertainties, that is, drug therapy safety or legal issues including cost coverage. Healthcare professionals often lack time and resources for comprehensive literature search and patient-specific risk-benefit analyses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this project is to develop, evaluate and rate agreement/disagreement on treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online Delphi study with two rounds each to rate agreement/disagreement with treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine. An international expert panel consisting of physicians, pharmacists and nurses working in palliative care evaluated previously developed recommendations based on the best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>/participants:Professionals (physicians, pharmacists, nursing staff) working in inpatient and home palliative care involved in the medication process were recruited as experts to participate. Between 64 and 75 experts participated in the first two Delphi studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64/68 recommendations on 21 drugs and 14 applications were agreed upon. Topics related to routes of administration as well as indications for sialorrhea, bronchorrhea, xerostomia, pruritus, singultus, fistula, gastroparesis and hot flashes. Recommendations that reached consensus are available to health care professionals via a free of charge database.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For many off-label use applications, it is likely that there will be no registration studies and therefore no drug approvals in the future. The consensus-based recommendations are intended to facilitate individual treatment planning for prescribers and to enable a more reflected handling of off-label use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"530-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251323123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251323123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物说明书外使用是姑息医学日常临床实践的一个组成部分。然而,它与许多不确定性有关,即药物治疗安全性或包括费用覆盖在内的法律问题。医疗保健专业人员通常缺乏时间和资源来进行全面的文献检索和特定患者的风险-收益分析。目的:该项目的目的是制定、评估和评价成人姑息治疗超说明书使用治疗建议的一致/不一致意见。设计:在线德尔菲研究,每两轮评估同意/不同意成人姑息治疗超说明书使用的治疗建议。由从事姑息治疗工作的医生、药剂师和护士组成的国际专家小组根据现有的最佳证据评估了以前制定的建议。环境/参与者:招募住院和家庭姑息治疗中参与用药过程的专业人员(医生、药剂师、护理人员)作为专家参与。64至75名专家参与了前两项德尔菲研究。结果:共有21种药物和14种应用达成64/68项建议。主题涉及给药途径以及指征唾液漏,支气管漏,口干症,瘙痒症,singultus,瘘,胃轻瘫和潮热。通过一个免费的数据库,卫生保健专业人员可以获得达成共识的建议。结论:对于许多超说明书使用申请,很可能不会有注册研究,因此未来不会有药物批准。基于共识的建议旨在促进处方者的个人治疗计划,并使对标签外使用的处理更加反映。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Off-label drug use in palliative medicine: Delphi study for the consensus of evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Background: Off-label use of drugs is an integral part of everyday clinical practice in palliative medicine. However, it is associated with many uncertainties, that is, drug therapy safety or legal issues including cost coverage. Healthcare professionals often lack time and resources for comprehensive literature search and patient-specific risk-benefit analyses.

Aim: The aim of this project is to develop, evaluate and rate agreement/disagreement on treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine.

Design: Online Delphi study with two rounds each to rate agreement/disagreement with treatment recommendations for off-label use in adult palliative medicine. An international expert panel consisting of physicians, pharmacists and nurses working in palliative care evaluated previously developed recommendations based on the best available evidence.

Setting: /participants:Professionals (physicians, pharmacists, nursing staff) working in inpatient and home palliative care involved in the medication process were recruited as experts to participate. Between 64 and 75 experts participated in the first two Delphi studies.

Results: A total of 64/68 recommendations on 21 drugs and 14 applications were agreed upon. Topics related to routes of administration as well as indications for sialorrhea, bronchorrhea, xerostomia, pruritus, singultus, fistula, gastroparesis and hot flashes. Recommendations that reached consensus are available to health care professionals via a free of charge database.

Conclusion: For many off-label use applications, it is likely that there will be no registration studies and therefore no drug approvals in the future. The consensus-based recommendations are intended to facilitate individual treatment planning for prescribers and to enable a more reflected handling of off-label use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信