2016-20 年澳大利亚寄宿养老院居民的口腔保健需求:一项回顾性横断面研究》(The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016-20: a retrospective crosssectional study)。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gillian E Caughey, Tracy Air, Miia Rahja, Maria C Inacio
{"title":"2016-20 年澳大利亚寄宿养老院居民的口腔保健需求:一项回顾性横断面研究》(The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016-20: a retrospective crosssectional study)。","authors":"Gillian E Caughey,&nbsp;Tracy Air,&nbsp;Miia Rahja,&nbsp;Maria C Inacio","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Providing high quality medical care for people living in residential aged care is a national challenge, and oral health care is one area that is inadequate.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In 2014, 84.7% of residents in Victorian nursing homes had untreated dental decay;<span><sup>2</sup></span> in 2015, 53% of Australians aged 65 years or older had periodontal disease and 19% complete tooth loss.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Poor oral health is associated with other adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and pneumonia.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that the access of aged care home residents to oral health practitioners be improved.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Apart from establishing the national Senior Dental Benefits Scheme and adding dental and oral health care to the Quality of Care Principles, evidence of effective action has, however, been limited.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>We therefore estimated the incidence of oral and dental-related care needs and health service and medication use for aged care residents, analysing data for the national historical cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA),<span><sup>6</sup></span> 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2020. We included all 360 305 non-Indigenous residents of aged care homes aged 65 years or older who did not hold Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) concession cards (access to Medicare Benefits Schedule [MBS] items is different for DVA card holders). Oral health information for 137 113 residents was based on the aged care eligibility assessments that have been conducted by the aged care eligibility assessment team since 1 July 2017. The assessment includes a mandatory question about problems with teeth, mouth, or dentures, including tooth loss, dental cavities, periodontal disease, and gingivitis (inflammation of the gums, dry mouth, tooth wear). We estimated crude and direct age- and sex-standardised (reference year: 2017–18 ROSA study cohort) cumulative incidence of hospitalisations with oral health or dental-related diagnoses as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), dental practitioner health service use (MBS data), and the dispensing of medications prescribed by public and private dentists (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Dental Schedule data), both overall and by financial year (Supporting Information, table 1). Hospitalisation analyses were limited by the availability of ROSA historical cohort data to aged care residents admitted to public hospitals in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (private hospitals data are not available for South Australia). The study was approved by the University of South Australia human research ethics committee (200489), the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ethics committee (EO2022/4/1376), the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing human research ethics committee (HREC/18/SAH/90), and the New South Wales Population and Health Services research ethics committee (2019/ETH12028).</p><p>The median age of the 360 305 eligible residents in 2830 residential aged care homes was 85 years (interquartile range [IQR], 80–90 years); 226 490 were women (62.9%), 192 310 were living with dementia (53.4%), and they had a median five (IQR, 3–7) health conditions. Median study follow-up time for residents was 499 days (IQR, 188–1002 days). Oral health care problems were identified for 26 842 of 137 113 people (19.6%; 95% CI, 19.4–19.8%). Of all eligible residents, 665 people (0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17–0.20%) had used MBS-subsidised dental practitioner health services, and 6605 (1.83%; 95% CI, 1.79–1.88%) had used medications prescribed by dentists (Box). A total of 4954 aged care residents in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (1.99%; 95% CI, 1.94–2.05%) had been hospitalised with dental or oral-related diagnoses (Supporting Information, table 3); 1167 hospitalisations (0.47% of residents; 95% CI, 0.44–0.50% were potentially preventable (Box).</p><p>Our findings, based on a population-based evaluation, can be generalised to all aged care home residents in Australia. However, we could not include dental services provided through the residential aged care home or paid for privately (ie, services that were not MBS-subsidised); data for private dental care in aged care homes is required to assess whether dental and oral health care needs are being met. In March 2024, 54.9% of older Australians had private health insurance,<span><sup>7</sup></span> which can include subsidisation of private dental services.</p><p>Despite recent government initiatives to improve the oral health of older Australians, including the <i>National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024</i>,<span><sup>8</sup></span> current models of care and service delivery in residential aged care are not meeting the needs of residents. The system, service, and workforce barriers to improving oral health include high staff turnover and the lack of oral health education for staff, the high costs and access problems of dental and oral health services, and the inadequate integration of aged care and health care systems.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> Encouragingly, the publicly funded dental domiciliary service program of the Sydney Local Health District, the Inner West Oral Health Outreach Program (Reach-OHT), has shown that a multidisciplinary team providing oral health assessments and treatments (largely diagnostic and preventive services) is a feasible and sustainable approach to oral health care for aged care residents.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Oral health policy and practice reforms are urgently needed to improve the health and wellbeing of older Australians living in aged care homes.</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley – Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p><p>The data underlying this report are not available for sharing because of restrictions imposed by the ethics and original data custodian approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 6","pages":"318-320"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016–20: a retrospective cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Gillian E Caughey,&nbsp;Tracy Air,&nbsp;Miia Rahja,&nbsp;Maria C Inacio\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Providing high quality medical care for people living in residential aged care is a national challenge, and oral health care is one area that is inadequate.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In 2014, 84.7% of residents in Victorian nursing homes had untreated dental decay;<span><sup>2</sup></span> in 2015, 53% of Australians aged 65 years or older had periodontal disease and 19% complete tooth loss.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Poor oral health is associated with other adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and pneumonia.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that the access of aged care home residents to oral health practitioners be improved.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Apart from establishing the national Senior Dental Benefits Scheme and adding dental and oral health care to the Quality of Care Principles, evidence of effective action has, however, been limited.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>We therefore estimated the incidence of oral and dental-related care needs and health service and medication use for aged care residents, analysing data for the national historical cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA),<span><sup>6</sup></span> 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2020. We included all 360 305 non-Indigenous residents of aged care homes aged 65 years or older who did not hold Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) concession cards (access to Medicare Benefits Schedule [MBS] items is different for DVA card holders). Oral health information for 137 113 residents was based on the aged care eligibility assessments that have been conducted by the aged care eligibility assessment team since 1 July 2017. The assessment includes a mandatory question about problems with teeth, mouth, or dentures, including tooth loss, dental cavities, periodontal disease, and gingivitis (inflammation of the gums, dry mouth, tooth wear). We estimated crude and direct age- and sex-standardised (reference year: 2017–18 ROSA study cohort) cumulative incidence of hospitalisations with oral health or dental-related diagnoses as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), dental practitioner health service use (MBS data), and the dispensing of medications prescribed by public and private dentists (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Dental Schedule data), both overall and by financial year (Supporting Information, table 1). Hospitalisation analyses were limited by the availability of ROSA historical cohort data to aged care residents admitted to public hospitals in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (private hospitals data are not available for South Australia). The study was approved by the University of South Australia human research ethics committee (200489), the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ethics committee (EO2022/4/1376), the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing human research ethics committee (HREC/18/SAH/90), and the New South Wales Population and Health Services research ethics committee (2019/ETH12028).</p><p>The median age of the 360 305 eligible residents in 2830 residential aged care homes was 85 years (interquartile range [IQR], 80–90 years); 226 490 were women (62.9%), 192 310 were living with dementia (53.4%), and they had a median five (IQR, 3–7) health conditions. Median study follow-up time for residents was 499 days (IQR, 188–1002 days). Oral health care problems were identified for 26 842 of 137 113 people (19.6%; 95% CI, 19.4–19.8%). Of all eligible residents, 665 people (0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17–0.20%) had used MBS-subsidised dental practitioner health services, and 6605 (1.83%; 95% CI, 1.79–1.88%) had used medications prescribed by dentists (Box). A total of 4954 aged care residents in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (1.99%; 95% CI, 1.94–2.05%) had been hospitalised with dental or oral-related diagnoses (Supporting Information, table 3); 1167 hospitalisations (0.47% of residents; 95% CI, 0.44–0.50% were potentially preventable (Box).</p><p>Our findings, based on a population-based evaluation, can be generalised to all aged care home residents in Australia. However, we could not include dental services provided through the residential aged care home or paid for privately (ie, services that were not MBS-subsidised); data for private dental care in aged care homes is required to assess whether dental and oral health care needs are being met. In March 2024, 54.9% of older Australians had private health insurance,<span><sup>7</sup></span> which can include subsidisation of private dental services.</p><p>Despite recent government initiatives to improve the oral health of older Australians, including the <i>National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024</i>,<span><sup>8</sup></span> current models of care and service delivery in residential aged care are not meeting the needs of residents. The system, service, and workforce barriers to improving oral health include high staff turnover and the lack of oral health education for staff, the high costs and access problems of dental and oral health services, and the inadequate integration of aged care and health care systems.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> Encouragingly, the publicly funded dental domiciliary service program of the Sydney Local Health District, the Inner West Oral Health Outreach Program (Reach-OHT), has shown that a multidisciplinary team providing oral health assessments and treatments (largely diagnostic and preventive services) is a feasible and sustainable approach to oral health care for aged care residents.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Oral health policy and practice reforms are urgently needed to improve the health and wellbeing of older Australians living in aged care homes.</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley – Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p><p>The data underlying this report are not available for sharing because of restrictions imposed by the ethics and original data custodian approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"222 6\",\"pages\":\"318-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52625\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016–20: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Providing high quality medical care for people living in residential aged care is a national challenge, and oral health care is one area that is inadequate.1 In 2014, 84.7% of residents in Victorian nursing homes had untreated dental decay;2 in 2015, 53% of Australians aged 65 years or older had periodontal disease and 19% complete tooth loss.3 Poor oral health is associated with other adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and pneumonia.4 The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that the access of aged care home residents to oral health practitioners be improved.1 Apart from establishing the national Senior Dental Benefits Scheme and adding dental and oral health care to the Quality of Care Principles, evidence of effective action has, however, been limited.5

We therefore estimated the incidence of oral and dental-related care needs and health service and medication use for aged care residents, analysing data for the national historical cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA),6 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2020. We included all 360 305 non-Indigenous residents of aged care homes aged 65 years or older who did not hold Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) concession cards (access to Medicare Benefits Schedule [MBS] items is different for DVA card holders). Oral health information for 137 113 residents was based on the aged care eligibility assessments that have been conducted by the aged care eligibility assessment team since 1 July 2017. The assessment includes a mandatory question about problems with teeth, mouth, or dentures, including tooth loss, dental cavities, periodontal disease, and gingivitis (inflammation of the gums, dry mouth, tooth wear). We estimated crude and direct age- and sex-standardised (reference year: 2017–18 ROSA study cohort) cumulative incidence of hospitalisations with oral health or dental-related diagnoses as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), dental practitioner health service use (MBS data), and the dispensing of medications prescribed by public and private dentists (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Dental Schedule data), both overall and by financial year (Supporting Information, table 1). Hospitalisation analyses were limited by the availability of ROSA historical cohort data to aged care residents admitted to public hospitals in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (private hospitals data are not available for South Australia). The study was approved by the University of South Australia human research ethics committee (200489), the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ethics committee (EO2022/4/1376), the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing human research ethics committee (HREC/18/SAH/90), and the New South Wales Population and Health Services research ethics committee (2019/ETH12028).

The median age of the 360 305 eligible residents in 2830 residential aged care homes was 85 years (interquartile range [IQR], 80–90 years); 226 490 were women (62.9%), 192 310 were living with dementia (53.4%), and they had a median five (IQR, 3–7) health conditions. Median study follow-up time for residents was 499 days (IQR, 188–1002 days). Oral health care problems were identified for 26 842 of 137 113 people (19.6%; 95% CI, 19.4–19.8%). Of all eligible residents, 665 people (0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17–0.20%) had used MBS-subsidised dental practitioner health services, and 6605 (1.83%; 95% CI, 1.79–1.88%) had used medications prescribed by dentists (Box). A total of 4954 aged care residents in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (1.99%; 95% CI, 1.94–2.05%) had been hospitalised with dental or oral-related diagnoses (Supporting Information, table 3); 1167 hospitalisations (0.47% of residents; 95% CI, 0.44–0.50% were potentially preventable (Box).

Our findings, based on a population-based evaluation, can be generalised to all aged care home residents in Australia. However, we could not include dental services provided through the residential aged care home or paid for privately (ie, services that were not MBS-subsidised); data for private dental care in aged care homes is required to assess whether dental and oral health care needs are being met. In March 2024, 54.9% of older Australians had private health insurance,7 which can include subsidisation of private dental services.

Despite recent government initiatives to improve the oral health of older Australians, including the National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024,8 current models of care and service delivery in residential aged care are not meeting the needs of residents. The system, service, and workforce barriers to improving oral health include high staff turnover and the lack of oral health education for staff, the high costs and access problems of dental and oral health services, and the inadequate integration of aged care and health care systems.9, 10 Encouragingly, the publicly funded dental domiciliary service program of the Sydney Local Health District, the Inner West Oral Health Outreach Program (Reach-OHT), has shown that a multidisciplinary team providing oral health assessments and treatments (largely diagnostic and preventive services) is a feasible and sustainable approach to oral health care for aged care residents.11 Oral health policy and practice reforms are urgently needed to improve the health and wellbeing of older Australians living in aged care homes.

Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley – Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

No relevant disclosures.

The data underlying this report are not available for sharing because of restrictions imposed by the ethics and original data custodian approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信