IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Song Wang, Hao Yang, Honglin Liao, Ping He, Xiang Zhang, Hao Liu, Bo Qu, Hongsheng Yang
{"title":"MRI-Based Cervical VBQ Scores as Predictors of Cage Subsidence in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Song Wang, Hao Yang, Honglin Liao, Ping He, Xiang Zhang, Hao Liu, Bo Qu, Hongsheng Yang","doi":"10.1177/21925682251327381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectivePoor bone quality is a major risk factor for complications after cervical spine surgery. The MRI-based cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score is a reliable tool for assessing bone quality. This study systematically evaluates, for the first time, the predictive value of C-VBQ for cage subsidence risk in cervical spine surgery patients using meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant literature in electronic databases up to October 16, 2024, to systematically assess the quality of included studies. Publication bias was evaluated by comparing C-VBQ between groups and calculating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.Results7 studies involving 681 patients were included. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, the studies were deemed high quality with low risk of bias. High C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with fusion subsidence, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI: 1.68-5.30). The C-VBQ cut-off value was 2.94 ± 0.32, and the combined sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing postoperative complications were 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92).ConclusionIn patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery, higher C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence. The C-VBQ score is a reliable tool for preoperative bone quality assessment and serves as an independent predictor of cage subsidence risk following cervical spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251327381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251327381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析。目的骨质差是颈椎手术后出现并发症的主要风险因素。基于磁共振成像的颈椎骨质(C-VBQ)评分是评估骨质的可靠工具。本研究首次采用荟萃分析法系统评估了C-VBQ对颈椎手术患者椎笼下沉风险的预测价值。方法我们全面检索了截至2024年10月16日的电子数据库中的相关文献,系统评估了纳入研究的质量。通过比较不同组间的 C-VBQ 并计算汇总的敏感性、特异性和汇总接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)来评估发表偏倚。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估 2 (QUADAS-2) 工具,这些研究被认为是高质量、低偏倚风险的研究。C-VBQ得分高与融合下沉显著相关,汇总的几率比为2.98(95% CI:1.68-5.30)。C-VBQ的临界值为2.94 ± 0.32,诊断术后并发症的综合灵敏度和特异度分别为0.78和0.87,曲线下面积为0.90(95% CI:0.87-0.92)。C-VBQ评分是术前骨质量评估的可靠工具,也是颈椎手术后椎笼下沉风险的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI-Based Cervical VBQ Scores as Predictors of Cage Subsidence in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectivePoor bone quality is a major risk factor for complications after cervical spine surgery. The MRI-based cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score is a reliable tool for assessing bone quality. This study systematically evaluates, for the first time, the predictive value of C-VBQ for cage subsidence risk in cervical spine surgery patients using meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant literature in electronic databases up to October 16, 2024, to systematically assess the quality of included studies. Publication bias was evaluated by comparing C-VBQ between groups and calculating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.Results7 studies involving 681 patients were included. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, the studies were deemed high quality with low risk of bias. High C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with fusion subsidence, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI: 1.68-5.30). The C-VBQ cut-off value was 2.94 ± 0.32, and the combined sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing postoperative complications were 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92).ConclusionIn patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery, higher C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence. The C-VBQ score is a reliable tool for preoperative bone quality assessment and serves as an independent predictor of cage subsidence risk following cervical spine surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信